I watched
Chronicles Of Riddick -
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0296572/reference/
in the *theatrical* version, which is better in every way compared to the director's cut.
1. everything the DC adds is redundant and over-explains the things which are later either hinted at, or explained subtly somewhere else
2. more fighting scenes do not make the film better
3. shorter runtime helps the pacing
4. they have the excellent "NEVER!" instead of the lame "fuck you" during the fight with the big bad guy.
i know there are mixed feelings about this film, but i loved it. Good villain, a good subplot about the power struggle in the necromonger faction, that intertwines with the main plot.
Some elements are weak, sure. Kyra is a horrible character, black-preacher-dude is poorly recycled. And, let's be honest, the whole necromonger stuff is quite cartoonish. Now, i don't terribly mind this last aspect, and i found the sets & costumes to be pretty good, aside from a few matte paintings and some other cost-related elements like that.
Vin Diesel is just great as Riddick, and hey, it's got Thandiwe Newton, you guys like her, right?
Karl Urban is the important secondary antagonist. And, the plot isn't just a dumb "kill the bad guy" schtick, there's a bit more to it and on top of that the what-little horror element that serves as the background story is quite nice, too.
Today i would rate this film
7/10. When it came out, fresh on the trail of Pitch Black, i would have given it a 8/10. If you watch this having NOT seen Pitch Black, probably 6/10.