• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

New Kerry Ad...Calls latest Bush ad "Juvenile"

now its ok b/c kerry is doing and its "true". Republicans could give 50 million people $1000 and democrats would complain that they shouldve given 100 million people $1500
 
Originally posted by: Todd33
Iraq is Bush's legacy, it's not a personal attack. Truth hurts.

Thats a pretty juvenile response.. but, I guess we've come to expect that.. and thats the truth.
 
Actually he's calling the new Bush ads "juvenile" so the title is a little misleading. If you recall that new RNC ad that shows Kerry windsurfing to the left and to the right. Him calling the ads juvenile are not personal attacks by any means.
 
Juvenile behavior is marked by egocentricity, an obstinate attitude, and refusal to change one's behavior.

Sounds like an accurate portrayal of Bush.
 
Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: Todd33
Iraq is Bush's legacy, it's not a personal attack. Truth hurts.

Thats a pretty juvenile response.. but, I guess we've come to expect that.. and thats the truth.

Do you have anything to add to the topic? No, you are just trolling with personal attacks. What I said was plain and simple, not an attack. Iraq is Bush's war, he got us in and he will go down in history with Iraq attached to his name. Now you don't think it's a legitimate topic for reelection? :thumbsdown:
 
Originally posted by: JHoNNy1OoO
Actually he's calling the new Bush ads "juvenile" so the title is a little misleading. If you recall that new RNC ad that shows Kerry windsurfing to the left and to the right. Him calling the ads juvenile are not personal attacks by any means.

Topic title corrected. 🙂
 
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: Crimson

Thats a pretty juvenile response.. but, I guess we've come to expect that.. and thats the truth.

Weren't you already banned once for personal attacks?

There are 5 lawyers in a Suburban SUV and they are about to drive off of a cliff. What's wrong with that picture?




A Suburban seats 8.

Love ya Mr. Vito.. :heart:
 
That seems to be a pretty lame ad IMO.

He starts by showing how "weak" and "hurt" he thinks America is(appealing to illogical emotion), then tries to claim the other guy is running "juvenile" ads(like whining about it isn't?) then he claims he has some "direction" or whatever for Iraq. Don't mind we are already training Iraqis, helping set up elections which are set for next year, and don't mind the fact that the "allies" involved were willing to join when the others turned a blind eye. Kerry isn't going to suddenly change the situation with the allies in Iraq - to think that is asinine. He isn't going to "speed" up anything over there either - he's just trying to play the "we are losing" card and hoping people buy his BS.

D+ for the ad because it didn't mention Vietnam.

CsG
 
Originally posted by: Crimson

There are 5 lawyers in a Suburban SUV and they are about to drive off of a cliff. What's wrong with that picture?




A Suburban seats 8.

Love ya Mr. Vito.. :heart:


This is a nice means for skirting the rules on personal attacks, at least in a weak, cowardly, passive-aggressive kind of way. Too bad there isn't a similar battery of snide jokes for anonymous, unimaginative keypunchers.
 
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
That seems to be a pretty lame ad IMO.

He starts by showing how "weak" and "hurt" he thinks America is(appealing to illogical emotion), then tries to claim the other guy is running "juvenile" ads(like whining about it isn't?) then he claims he has some "direction" or whatever for Iraq. Don't mind we are already training Iraqis, helping set up elections which are set for next year, and don't mind the fact that the "allies" involved were willing to join when the others turned a blind eye. Kerry isn't going to suddenly change the situation with the allies in Iraq - to think that is asinine. He isn't going to "speed" up anything over there either - he's just trying to play the "we are losing" card and hoping people buy his BS.

D+ for the ad because it didn't mention Vietnam.

CsG

We're training Iraqis?

How many have gone thru the full 6-month course? Zero.
How many have been decently trained? 5,000 or so...not the 200k number claimed by Rumsfeld (or was that Cheney?) Doesn't matter...they're both full of sh*t.
 
Originally posted by: conjur
We're training Iraqis?

How many have gone thru the full 6-week course? Zero.
How many have been decently trained? 5,000 or so...not the 200k number claimed by Rumsfeld (or was that Cheney?) Doesn't matter...they're both full of sh*t.
And how would Kerry fix this? By 'speeding up the training program'? Yeah, cut the number of weeks of the training to 6 to 4 and of course the numbers will go up. Of course, I believe the number was really 24, but the example still holds.
 
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: conjur
We're training Iraqis?

How many have gone thru the full 6-week course? Zero.
How many have been decently trained? 5,000 or so...not the 200k number claimed by Rumsfeld (or was that Cheney?) Doesn't matter...they're both full of sh*t.
And how would Kerry fix this? By 'speeding up the training program'? Yeah, cut the number of weeks of the training to 6 to 4 and of course the numbers will go up. Of course, I believe the number was really 24, but the example still holds.

I actually agree with you.

The larger problem is that the country is presently so lacking in security that police and soldiers in training are easy pickings for all the terrorists who have flocked to Iraq (as witnessed by the hundreds of trainees who have already died this year). The present environment over there is simply not conducive to building a viable defense force, much less any kind of infrastructure.
 
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: conjur
We're training Iraqis?

How many have gone thru the full 6-week course? Zero.
How many have been decently trained? 5,000 or so...not the 200k number claimed by Rumsfeld (or was that Cheney?) Doesn't matter...they're both full of sh*t.
And how would Kerry fix this? By 'speeding up the training program'? Yeah, cut the number of weeks of the training to 6 to 4 and of course the numbers will go up. Of course, I believe the number was really 24, but the example still holds.

I actually agree with you.

The larger problem is that the country is presently so lacking in security that police and soldiers in training are easy pickings for all the terrorists who have flocked to Iraq (as witnessed by the hundreds of trainees who have already died this year). The present environment over there is simply not conducive to building a viable defense force, much less any kind of infrastructure.

Whats your suggestion then? We have a lot of people who like to point out problems, and nobody who is willing to go out on the line and say what THEY would do.
 
Originally posted by: Crimson

Whats your suggestion then? We have a lot of people who like to point out problems, and nobody who is willing to go out on the line and say what THEY would do.

It's not really my job to solve this - that will happen at a far higher pay grade than mine, and be informed by intel much more comprehensive than any to which I have access.

That said, it seems to me we can't really effect regime change in Iraq without providing enough troops to truly secure the country. Our current approach is neither fish nor fowl, and leaves Iraq in limbo, because terrorists and insurgents keep killing their trainees and destroying pipelines, electrical lines, and other fundamental infrastructure. If we can't protect aid workers or police trainees, we haven't won the war yet. It seems to me the war simply isn't over, and we're trying to act as though it is.

It seems to me we either need to truly commit to this conflict with an eye toward victory (which will almost certainly require a draft), or cut our losses and run. Our current approach is like a death by a thousand cuts, and will lead, slowly and inevitably, toward a much costlier loss.

These problems were perfectly predictable to anyone previewing OIF without rose-colored, PNAC-issued glasses. This war is the biggest failure of the US military and foreign policy in history IMO.
 
Dump Bush, try him and the Neocons in the Hague, apologize and pull out. Begin a huge war to solarize and wind mill the nation. Reverse the SC decisions that corporations are people and money is speech.
 
Back
Top