Originally posted by: XZeroII
Werent you liberals mentioning a month back about how democrats don't do personal attacks?
Originally posted by: Todd33
Iraq is Bush's legacy, it's not a personal attack. Truth hurts.
If an appeal to emotion is a good ad, then yes, this is. John Kerry's plan is to get allies involved, yet I haven't heard how he plans to do that, nor do I believe that any 'allies' will make significant troop contributions to Iraq.Originally posted by: conjur
http://www.johnkerry.com/video...venile#092204_juvenile
A good ad that hits Bush squarely. 🙂
Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: Todd33
Iraq is Bush's legacy, it's not a personal attack. Truth hurts.
Thats a pretty juvenile response.. but, I guess we've come to expect that.. and thats the truth.
Originally posted by: Crimson
Thats a pretty juvenile response.. but, I guess we've come to expect that.. and thats the truth.
Originally posted by: JHoNNy1OoO
Actually he's calling the new Bush ads "juvenile" so the title is a little misleading. If you recall that new RNC ad that shows Kerry windsurfing to the left and to the right. Him calling the ads juvenile are not personal attacks by any means.
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: Crimson
Thats a pretty juvenile response.. but, I guess we've come to expect that.. and thats the truth.
Weren't you already banned once for personal attacks?
Originally posted by: Crimson
There are 5 lawyers in a Suburban SUV and they are about to drive off of a cliff. What's wrong with that picture?
A Suburban seats 8.
Love ya Mr. Vito.. :heart:
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
That seems to be a pretty lame ad IMO.
He starts by showing how "weak" and "hurt" he thinks America is(appealing to illogical emotion), then tries to claim the other guy is running "juvenile" ads(like whining about it isn't?) then he claims he has some "direction" or whatever for Iraq. Don't mind we are already training Iraqis, helping set up elections which are set for next year, and don't mind the fact that the "allies" involved were willing to join when the others turned a blind eye. Kerry isn't going to suddenly change the situation with the allies in Iraq - to think that is asinine. He isn't going to "speed" up anything over there either - he's just trying to play the "we are losing" card and hoping people buy his BS.
D+ for the ad because it didn't mention Vietnam.
CsG
Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
^^^^^^^ source?
And how would Kerry fix this? By 'speeding up the training program'? Yeah, cut the number of weeks of the training to 6 to 4 and of course the numbers will go up. Of course, I believe the number was really 24, but the example still holds.Originally posted by: conjur
We're training Iraqis?
How many have gone thru the full 6-week course? Zero.
How many have been decently trained? 5,000 or so...not the 200k number claimed by Rumsfeld (or was that Cheney?) Doesn't matter...they're both full of sh*t.
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
And how would Kerry fix this? By 'speeding up the training program'? Yeah, cut the number of weeks of the training to 6 to 4 and of course the numbers will go up. Of course, I believe the number was really 24, but the example still holds.Originally posted by: conjur
We're training Iraqis?
How many have gone thru the full 6-week course? Zero.
How many have been decently trained? 5,000 or so...not the 200k number claimed by Rumsfeld (or was that Cheney?) Doesn't matter...they're both full of sh*t.
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
And how would Kerry fix this? By 'speeding up the training program'? Yeah, cut the number of weeks of the training to 6 to 4 and of course the numbers will go up. Of course, I believe the number was really 24, but the example still holds.Originally posted by: conjur
We're training Iraqis?
How many have gone thru the full 6-week course? Zero.
How many have been decently trained? 5,000 or so...not the 200k number claimed by Rumsfeld (or was that Cheney?) Doesn't matter...they're both full of sh*t.
I actually agree with you.
The larger problem is that the country is presently so lacking in security that police and soldiers in training are easy pickings for all the terrorists who have flocked to Iraq (as witnessed by the hundreds of trainees who have already died this year). The present environment over there is simply not conducive to building a viable defense force, much less any kind of infrastructure.
Originally posted by: Crimson
Whats your suggestion then? We have a lot of people who like to point out problems, and nobody who is willing to go out on the line and say what THEY would do.