Originally posted by: aidanjm
I wonder how responses would differ if there was a suggestion to introduce a beautiful lesbian (i.e., female) spy, with maybe some hot lesbian (i.e., girl on girl) scenes, to the next Bond movie? People suggesting that any gay characters might be introduced to Bond in order to appease gay people or gay rights groups are exceedingly clueless. In reality, knowing the exploitative nature of the Bond franchise, if there were homosexual characters introduced they would most likely be:
1) a foppish, weak, deranged gay man - presented as a serial killer, or
2) a hot yet evil and utlimately doomed lesbian, presented for the sole purpose of validating the absurd heterosexual male fantasy re: lesbian women
Originally posted by: Xanis
Full-frontal female nudity equal an R rating. No 007 movie has EVER earned a R before, IIRC. They would lose a good portion of their audience. Also, it's just not needed. James Bond is about badass ninja skills, silenced pistols, and cool hi-tech gadgets.... not gay and full-frontal nude scenes.
Originally posted by: ryan256
Originally posted by: Xanis
Full-frontal female nudity equal an R rating. No 007 movie has EVER earned a R before, IIRC. They would lose a good portion of their audience. Also, it's just not needed. James Bond is about badass ninja skills, silenced pistols, and cool hi-tech gadgets.... not gay and full-frontal nude scenes.
Fixed.
Full frontal male nudity = X rating
Originally posted by: Injury
They have yet to show a bare boob in any of the 20 (21) Bond films. If they're going to break out a cock just to "keep up with the times" then the franchise needs to die.
I stand by my statement that it's been a proud year for George Lazenby, who is no longer the worst Bond ever.
