Originally posted by: CrimsonKing
I read an interview with a guy whose company makes the micro HDs and he claimed they were much more jitter resistant than a normal hard drive, so in addition to being 60% of the size of the normal iPod ( 3.6 cu in vs. 6.1 cu in.), it's less susceptible to damage or skipping when working out, especially running. Personally, I would never have time to put all 7-800 CDs on a hard drive. Nor would I want that to be the main source of music. Compressed music sucks, sonically, and I didn't drop thousands of dollars on sound systems and CDs to hear them garbled up by a computer. It's good for the airplane, walking to the office from my car and running on a noisy treadmill. It'll never replace the real thing until it can read shn files. And even then, I prefer the packaging my CD comes in from the artist to a file on my hard drive. But that's just my opinion; I could be wrong. . . </OFF soapbox>I think these units will eventually fall a few more notches, price-wise. If anyone has used both the Rio microdrive unit and this one, I'd love to see a comparison. Good sound is important to me, and one of the reasons I held off on the normal iPod was because I heard it didn't sound as good as the competition. -KC As an added observation, I just started looking around the apple site to find out what kind of batteries this uses (hopefully AA, but I can't find it). I find it interesting that Apple thinks someone who listens to compressed audio would want to shell out the extra $$$ for a Monster Cable to connect it to their stereo system! LOL
I don't know. If you like uncompressed music then you might want the bigger iPod, since you can only put maybe 7-8 CDs on the mini at one time. I really think the iPod needs to support some form of lossless compression before I seriously want one. I realize the point of you post is to say that you want to use the mini iPod just for a small fraction of your collection in compressed form. The interesting thing is that Stereophile (okay, they used to be good but nowdays they seem to going the way of Stereo Review, but they're still credible to some extent) did a review on the iPod, and it turns out that it has pretty good performance playing .wav files. In fact it measured better in some areas than a pretty good CD player. Still, it would never replace my CD player, but it can be an option sometimes. PM me if you want info on the review.