Goosemaster
Lifer
Originally posted by: vexingv
btw, itunes 7 is taking up 100mb of memory right now. i hope its just b/c its "analyzing for gapless playback."
playing back an mp3 and using 34MB
Originally posted by: vexingv
btw, itunes 7 is taking up 100mb of memory right now. i hope its just b/c its "analyzing for gapless playback."
Originally posted by: NFS4
WTF! I just downloaded Tetris and tried to sync it and it says:
"A software update is required for this iPod to support games"
Looks like a firmware update is on the way with game support and possibly gapless playback for 5G iPods!! 😀
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: vexingv
btw, itunes 7 is taking up 100mb of memory right now. i hope its just b/c its "analyzing for gapless playback."
playing back an mp3 and using 34MB
Originally posted by: AnyMal
Originally posted by: NFS4
WTF! I just downloaded Tetris and tried to sync it and it says:
"A software update is required for this iPod to support games"
Looks like a firmware update is on the way with game support and possibly gapless playback for 5G iPods!! 😀
You paid $5 for Tetris? LOL
Originally posted by: jimbob200521
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: vexingv
btw, itunes 7 is taking up 100mb of memory right now. i hope its just b/c its "analyzing for gapless playback."
playing back an mp3 and using 34MB
I've had it open for about an hour and am up to 60mb.
Originally posted by: j00fek
still wont buy one
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
Originally posted by: jimbob200521
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: vexingv
btw, itunes 7 is taking up 100mb of memory right now. i hope its just b/c its "analyzing for gapless playback."
playing back an mp3 and using 34MB
I've had it open for about an hour and am up to 60mb.
winamp 5.x has been running for days, and is only taking up 3.3MB 😀
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
Originally posted by: jimbob200521
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: vexingv
btw, itunes 7 is taking up 100mb of memory right now. i hope its just b/c its "analyzing for gapless playback."
playing back an mp3 and using 34MB
I've had it open for about an hour and am up to 60mb.
winamp 5.x has been running for days, and is only taking up 3.3MB 😀
firefox has been running for 20min and is using 100+ MB :|
With all the caching that modern browsers do, 61MB is nothing. According to Activity Monitor, my Safari footprint regularly tops 600MB. :frown: But I don't get any thrashing so the memory manager must be doing its job.Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
Originally posted by: jimbob200521
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: vexingv
btw, itunes 7 is taking up 100mb of memory right now. i hope its just b/c its "analyzing for gapless playback."
playing back an mp3 and using 34MB
I've had it open for about an hour and am up to 60mb.
winamp 5.x has been running for days, and is only taking up 3.3MB 😀
firefox has been running for 20min and is using 100+ MB :|
yeah FF is whoring me too (61MB).... i hope they somehow reduce its ram usage, that'd be quite nice. the worst is when FF hangs due to some incompatibility... it takes over all my ram😛
Originally posted by: manly
With all the caching that modern browsers do, 61MB is nothing. According to Activity Monitor, my Safari footprint regularly tops 600MB. :frown: But I don't get any thrashing so the memory manager must be doing its job.Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
Originally posted by: jimbob200521
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: vexingv
btw, itunes 7 is taking up 100mb of memory right now. i hope its just b/c its "analyzing for gapless playback."
playing back an mp3 and using 34MB
I've had it open for about an hour and am up to 60mb.
winamp 5.x has been running for days, and is only taking up 3.3MB 😀
firefox has been running for 20min and is using 100+ MB :|
yeah FF is whoring me too (61MB).... i hope they somehow reduce its ram usage, that'd be quite nice. the worst is when FF hangs due to some incompatibility... it takes over all my ram😛
Originally posted by: state 08
New Nano looks quite tempting.
I thought it did work with WMP and isn't it higher res than 640x480 (which is not 480p)?Originally posted by: Goosemaster
kind of feel bad for amazon🙁
if they want their service to get publicity, they need to make it work with windows media player 11 so it has a chance to compete with itunes and they need to release HD stuff soon to beat Apple's inclusion of 480p DVD-resolution video.
Originally posted by: loup garou
I thought it did work with WMP and isn't it higher res than 640x480 (which is not 480p)?Originally posted by: Goosemaster
kind of feel bad for amazon🙁
if they want their service to get publicity, they need to make it work with windows media player 11 so it has a chance to compete with itunes and they need to release HD stuff soon to beat Apple's inclusion of 480p DVD-resolution video.
Originally posted by: Eug
Some key points:
1) iPod supports 640x480 H.264 video playback, up to 1.5 Mbps. <-- Good, but I was hoping for 2.5 Mbps.
2) Nanos and shuffles are aluminum.
3) The biggest nano is 8 GB, but only in black. <-- That is farking stupid.
4) The 4 GB nanos are silver, blue, green, pink.
5) The 2 GB nano is silver.
6) The shuffles are silver and much, much smaller.
Also: New iTunes 7, with H.264 640x480 TV shows and movies.
Sneak peek: New set top box next year with HDMI and wireless. <-- I'll probably buy one.
According to Ameesh:Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: loup garou
I thought it did work with WMP and isn't it higher res than 640x480 (which is not 480p)?Originally posted by: Goosemaster
kind of feel bad for amazon🙁
if they want their service to get publicity, they need to make it work with windows media player 11 so it has a chance to compete with itunes and they need to release HD stuff soon to beat Apple's inclusion of 480p DVD-resolution video.
Loosk to be the same resolution and they are indeed using the VC-1 codec from microsoft (same as used with WMV-HD files and it can be used on HD-DVD's) but it looks like their player msut be used for management and viewing.