Come back when you DO get hit by a comet...then we might have some news.Originally posted by: Spamela
you're all neglecting to parse carefully the thread title & OP.
it says "could," as in
"i could be hit by a comet on the way to the gym today."
so, give him some slack.
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Good to see, once again, the anti-war crowd keep an open mind and a willing acceptance to discover the truth. :roll:
Though another Defense Department contractor last week backed up Weldon's story, former 9/11 commission chairman Tom Kean said in a statement earlier this month that all three commission aides who attended a 2003 interview at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan with Lt. Col Anthony Shaffer, an intelligence liason to Able Danger, do not remember Mohammad Atta's name coming up.
The panel also said that a Bush Administration lawyer?who, sources told TIME, was a National Security Council attorney present as a "minder" on behalf of the White House?agreed that Shaffer did not mention Atta's name. But Shaffer told TIME that he remembers specifically saying that the staff on the secret project had "found through the effort two of the three cells which conducted the 9/11 attack, to include Atta."
The Pentagon has yet to find any documents to support this claim. Pentagon spokesman Larry Di Rita said on Fox news Friday they are still reviewing the matter but "thus far have not found what it is those handful of individuals seem to remember."
Originally posted by: The Lord
I'm surprised zendari hasn't posted a thread linking Sheehan to 9/11 yet.
Leave to the liberal TLC to become a Spewsmax apologist.Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Good to see, once again, the anti-war crowd keep an open mind and a willing acceptance to discover the truth. :roll:
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Pentagon has so far been unable to validate a claim that a secret military intelligence unit identified four September 11 hijackers as al Qaeda members a year before the 2001 attacks, a spokesman said Monday.
But Larry Di Rita said the Pentagon is still looking into the matter. He said the investigation has found general references to terrorist cells, but he would not elaborate.
Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, a member of the secret intelligence unit called Able Danger, said recently that the unit identified Mohamed Atta and three other hijackers as members of a "Brooklyn cell" more than a year before the 9/11 attacks. (Full story)
"We have not found what Shaffer says exists," Di Rita told reporters.
Shaffer has said he alerted the FBI in September 2000 about the information he says Able Danger uncovered, but that three planned meetings he set up with bureau officials were blocked by military lawyers.
He also said he met with the now-defunct 9/11 commission and passed on what he knew. The information was not contained in the panel's final report.
In a statement issued August 12, Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, the chairman and vice-chairman of the 9/11 commission, did not dispute that a program called Able Danger existed and that the commission had investigated it.
But, they said, the covert program "did not turn out to be historically significant, set against the larger context of U.S. policy and intelligence efforts that involved [Osama] bin Laden and al Qaeda." (Full story)
Shaffer told CNN Wednesday he worked this year with Rep. Curt Weldon, vice chairman of the House Armed Services and Homeland Security committees, and they determined "there was a significant amount of information that was totally deleted or not provided to the 9/11 commissioners."
The lieutenant colonel said Able Danger uncovered information about Atta by searching through public databases and looking for patterns.
Shaffer declined to be specific about what kind of documents linked Atta to al Qaeda, saying intelligence units continue to use such processes.
On Tuesday, Weldon told CNN that Shaffer set up meetings with FBI officials in 2000.
But the Pennsylvania Republican said the sessions were canceled because lawyers for the Special Forces unit -- of which Able Danger was a member -- allegedly were concerned military authorities could not legally share information with domestic law enforcement about potential terror suspects in the United States.
Originally posted by: zendari
Yeah, many of the documents happened to walk out in Sandy Berger's pockets. Thomas Kean and his 911 cohorts have changed their story a half dozen times in the past few weeks.
But if you are so convinced that this is nothing I take it you have no objections to a Senate Investigation. And I am shocked that you are accusing Col. Shaeffer of lying; he's not even part of the Bush administration as you claim.
Wholly apart from the increasing dubiousness of the Atta allegations, the Berger connection appears to be complete speculation. There is no evidence that Berger removed any original documents from the archives; he admitted only to taking copies of a classified assessment of counterterrorism measures enacted prior to the millennium celebrations.
On April 1, Berger pleaded guilty to removing and destroying copies of classified documents from the National Archives. The New York Times reported on April 2 that the documents Berger "admitted taking included copies of versions of an assessment made in 2000 involving antiterrorism measures taken in the wake of threats preceding the 1999 millennium celebrations," and that a Justice Department investigation "found no evidence that Mr. Berger had intended to hide anything from the Sept. 11 commission."
Able Danger was not included in the final commission report because three separate commission requests did not yield Pentagon documents that could confirm that a military unit had identified any of the future hijackers, Kean said.
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: Harvey
TIN FOIL BEANY ALERT!!! TIN FOIL BEANY ALERT!!! It's another POS from Newsmax! :shocked:
:roll: :laugh: Buahahaha! :laugh: :roll:
zendari -- You're a pathetic joke.![]()
LOL! :laugh:
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Good to see, once again, the anti-war crowd keep an open mind and a willing acceptance to discover the truth. :roll:
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Good to see, once again, the anti-war crowd keep an open mind and a willing acceptance to discover the truth. :roll:
New 9/11 Probe Could Spotlight Iraq Link
New 9/11 Probe Could Spotlight Iraq Link
New 9/11 Probe Could Spotlight Iraq Link
New 9/11 Probe Could Spotlight Iraq Link
We would if we could, LMAO!!
Originally posted by: BBond
If I'm poopooing on purple ostrich feathers does that mean I don't have to wipe?
Originally posted by: conjur
Leave to the liberal TLC to become a Spewsmax apologist.Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Good to see, once again, the anti-war crowd keep an open mind and a willing acceptance to discover the truth. :roll:
:roll:
