New 9/11 Probe Could Spotlight Iraq Link

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Spamela

Diamond Member
Oct 30, 2000
3,859
0
76
you're all neglecting to parse carefully the thread title & OP.
it says "could," as in
"i could be hit by a comet on the way to the gym today."

so, give him some slack.
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
Originally posted by: Spamela
you're all neglecting to parse carefully the thread title & OP.
it says "could," as in
"i could be hit by a comet on the way to the gym today."

so, give him some slack.
Come back when you DO get hit by a comet...then we might have some news.
 

TRUMPHENT

Golden Member
Jan 20, 2001
1,414
0
0
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Good to see, once again, the anti-war crowd keep an open mind and a willing acceptance to discover the truth. :roll:

David Kay discovered the truth. After dancing around two Marconi weather balloon trailers and expounding prophetic on the "Seven Miles of Documents". He proclaimed that Iraq had no WMD programs since 1991. Almost forgot, he also got Congress to shell out another 600 million dollars for hunt for nothing.

Why is Saddam Hussein kept in such splendid isolation? He would refute the clams of this ethereal "Able Danger" mythology. The proper tiime for this stinkbomb to surface was during the 9/11 Commission investigation. That was the commission that Bush and administration was determined to prevent. Don't you find it a littlle disconcerting that the current Secretary of State and former National Security Advisor omitted mentioning this in front of that commission? She was happy to make the talk show circuit but had to be dragged kicking and screaming to socall "testify" in front of the commission.

I find it to be totally coincidental that this new myth surfaces as the approval for the war goes deeply into the red. NOT!
 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
This stinkbomb did surface during the 9/11 Commission hearings. It didn't coincide with any of the know information so the Commission disregarded it. End of story. It's just another desparate attempt by Bush and his band of neocon idiots to ressurect a lie to justify their lies.
 

zendari

Banned
May 27, 2005
6,558
0
0
Wrong, BBond. But way to distract and try to defend the Clinton Administration coverups.

Third Source Backs 'Able Danger' Claims About Atta

WASHINGTON ? A third person has now come forward to verify claims made by a military intelligence unit that a year before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, it had information showing that lead hijacker Mohamed Atta (search) and other terrorists were identified as being in the United States.

J.D. Smith, a defense contractor who claims he worked on the technical side of the unit, code-named "Able Danger" (search), told reporters Friday that he helped gather open-source information (search), reported on government spending and helped generate charts associated with the unit's work. Able Danger was set up in the 1990s to track Al Qaeda activity worldwide.



The Senate is going to investigate the 911 Omission Commission and bring the truth to light. Might put a roadblock in front of Hillary's presidential ambitions.
 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
Though another Defense Department contractor last week backed up Weldon's story, former 9/11 commission chairman Tom Kean said in a statement earlier this month that all three commission aides who attended a 2003 interview at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan with Lt. Col Anthony Shaffer, an intelligence liason to Able Danger, do not remember Mohammad Atta's name coming up.

The panel also said that a Bush Administration lawyer?who, sources told TIME, was a National Security Council attorney present as a "minder" on behalf of the White House?agreed that Shaffer did not mention Atta's name. But Shaffer told TIME that he remembers specifically saying that the staff on the secret project had "found through the effort two of the three cells which conducted the 9/11 attack, to include Atta."

The Pentagon has yet to find any documents to support this claim. Pentagon spokesman Larry Di Rita said on Fox news Friday they are still reviewing the matter but "thus far have not found what it is those handful of individuals seem to remember."

Just more Bush!t.

Link

And from such an honest, unbiased source. Larry DeRita. Recently promoted by Bush to Pentagon spokesperson.

:roll:

Who would ever believe, based on past performance, that these people would LIE? :shocked:


 

zendari

Banned
May 27, 2005
6,558
0
0
Yeah, many of the documents happened to walk out in Sandy Berger's pockets. Thomas Kean and his 911 cohorts have changed their story a half dozen times in the past few weeks.

But if you are so convinced that this is nothing I take it you have no objections to a Senate Investigation. And I am shocked that you are accusing Col. Shaeffer of lying; he's not even part of the Bush administration as you claim.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Good to see, once again, the anti-war crowd keep an open mind and a willing acceptance to discover the truth. :roll:
Leave to the liberal TLC to become a Spewsmax apologist.


:roll:
 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
PS Zendari,

Pentagon can't verify Able Danger claim

Initial probe hasn't confirmed hijackers were watched before 9/11

Monday, August 22, 2005; Posted: 9:40 p.m. EDT (01:40 GMT)

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Pentagon has so far been unable to validate a claim that a secret military intelligence unit identified four September 11 hijackers as al Qaeda members a year before the 2001 attacks, a spokesman said Monday.

But Larry Di Rita said the Pentagon is still looking into the matter. He said the investigation has found general references to terrorist cells, but he would not elaborate.

Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, a member of the secret intelligence unit called Able Danger, said recently that the unit identified Mohamed Atta and three other hijackers as members of a "Brooklyn cell" more than a year before the 9/11 attacks. (Full story)

"We have not found what Shaffer says exists," Di Rita told reporters.

Shaffer has said he alerted the FBI in September 2000 about the information he says Able Danger uncovered, but that three planned meetings he set up with bureau officials were blocked by military lawyers.

He also said he met with the now-defunct 9/11 commission and passed on what he knew. The information was not contained in the panel's final report.

In a statement issued August 12, Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, the chairman and vice-chairman of the 9/11 commission, did not dispute that a program called Able Danger existed and that the commission had investigated it.

But, they said, the covert program "did not turn out to be historically significant, set against the larger context of U.S. policy and intelligence efforts that involved [Osama] bin Laden and al Qaeda." (Full story)

Shaffer told CNN Wednesday he worked this year with Rep. Curt Weldon, vice chairman of the House Armed Services and Homeland Security committees, and they determined "there was a significant amount of information that was totally deleted or not provided to the 9/11 commissioners."

The lieutenant colonel said Able Danger uncovered information about Atta by searching through public databases and looking for patterns.

Shaffer declined to be specific about what kind of documents linked Atta to al Qaeda, saying intelligence units continue to use such processes.

On Tuesday, Weldon told CNN that Shaffer set up meetings with FBI officials in 2000.

But the Pennsylvania Republican said the sessions were canceled because lawyers for the Special Forces unit -- of which Able Danger was a member -- allegedly were concerned military authorities could not legally share information with domestic law enforcement about potential terror suspects in the United States.
 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
Originally posted by: zendari
Yeah, many of the documents happened to walk out in Sandy Berger's pockets. Thomas Kean and his 911 cohorts have changed their story a half dozen times in the past few weeks.

But if you are so convinced that this is nothing I take it you have no objections to a Senate Investigation. And I am shocked that you are accusing Col. Shaeffer of lying; he's not even part of the Bush administration as you claim.


Zendari, you've been listening to an obese, drugged out, lying POS again, haven't you?

Wholly apart from the increasing dubiousness of the Atta allegations, the Berger connection appears to be complete speculation. There is no evidence that Berger removed any original documents from the archives; he admitted only to taking copies of a classified assessment of counterterrorism measures enacted prior to the millennium celebrations.

On April 1, Berger pleaded guilty to removing and destroying copies of classified documents from the National Archives. The New York Times reported on April 2 that the documents Berger "admitted taking included copies of versions of an assessment made in 2000 involving antiterrorism measures taken in the wake of threats preceding the 1999 millennium celebrations," and that a Justice Department investigation "found no evidence that Mr. Berger had intended to hide anything from the Sept. 11 commission."

Link

No proof. Just more lies. But hey, at least you people are consistent. Lies are all you people have ever offered.
 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
Oh, and there is this report from none other than Fox "news".

Able Danger was not included in the final commission report because three separate commission requests did not yield Pentagon documents that could confirm that a military unit had identified any of the future hijackers, Kean said.

Link

 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
PS I hear that Able Danger found WMD in Iraq too. They just can't provide any proof.

:roll:

When will you people WTFU???
 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,833
1
0
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: Harvey
TIN FOIL BEANY ALERT!!! TIN FOIL BEANY ALERT!!! It's another POS from Newsmax! :shocked:

:cookie: :roll: :laugh: Buahahaha! :laugh: :roll: :cookie:

zendari -- You're a pathetic joke. :p

LOL! :laugh:

I'd like to "third" that.
 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,833
1
0
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Good to see, once again, the anti-war crowd keep an open mind and a willing acceptance to discover the truth. :roll:

New 9/11 Probe Could Spotlight Iraq Link

New 9/11 Probe Could Spotlight Iraq Link

New 9/11 Probe Could Spotlight Iraq Link

New 9/11 Probe Could Spotlight Iraq Link



We would if we could, LMAO!!

 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Good to see, once again, the anti-war crowd keep an open mind and a willing acceptance to discover the truth. :roll:

New 9/11 Probe Could Spotlight Iraq Link

New 9/11 Probe Could Spotlight Iraq Link

New 9/11 Probe Could Spotlight Iraq Link

New 9/11 Probe Could Spotlight Iraq Link



We would if we could, LMAO!!

Yet when Bush said Saddam DID have WMD they jumped at the notion. And that's all it was. A notion. And they still defend it even after thousands of lives were lost and hundreds of millions of dollars were wasted looking for that which didn't exist.

SUCKERS!
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,827
6,782
126
It is nice to know, though, that if I decide to justify the war in Iraq on the basis that Saddam was trying to create purple ostrich feathers, TLC will rush in to defend me against all you irrational Poopooers. Keep an open mind, for Christ's sakes. Even gravity's a damn theory.
 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
If I'm poopooing on purple ostrich feathers does that mean I don't have to wipe?

 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Earth to zendari. There is NO Iraq link to 9/11. If there was we wouldn't have had to wait years for it to come out. It would have been out of Dubya's mouth immediately. Stop posting.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Good to see, once again, the anti-war crowd keep an open mind and a willing acceptance to discover the truth. :roll:
Leave to the liberal TLC to become a Spewsmax apologist.


:roll:

Right, maybe he can post some tabloid and blogger links to support his buddy, Z.

Pfffft. :thumbsdown:
 

judasmachine

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2002
8,515
3
81
I bet they'd have better luck tying Iran to Osama. Hell why not go after Saudi Arabia too, we know they supported Osama. Since we're out for everyone that supported him why don't we take out the US state deptartment.