So about that 'unreleased evidence' against Steve, those 'leg irons' aren't 'leg irons' at all:
https://www.reddit.com/r/MakingaMurderer/comments/3zwbwq/leg_irons/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3psQSTN8m8&feature=youtu.be&t=261
Bunch of liars!
Edit: no blood on these furry 'leg irons' either! I would imagine removing blood from those would be very difficult.
My comment wasn't about any undisclosed evidence but the mere fact that any Manitowoc personnel were involved in the investigation. Everyone know that they had very deliberately set Avery up for rape and that it cost him 18 years of his life. So they shouldn't have been within a light year of this case. I think that's enough to raise suspicion about any physical evidence that was found.There isn't much in the 'left out' evidence that sways my opinion more towards guilt. What did for you?
My comment wasn't about any undisclosed evidence but the mere fact that any Manitowoc personnel were involved in the investigation. Everyone know that they had very deliberately set Avery up for rape and that it cost him 18 years of his life. So they shouldn't have been within a light year of this case. I think that's enough to raise suspicion about any physical evidence that was found.
No, I don't think he's guilty. I think the only evidence incriminating him was planted by the police.I was asking about your change of opinion on Avery being more guilty than you thought before, unless I misunderstood.
I was asking about your change of opinion on Avery being more guilty than you thought before, unless I misunderstood.
So this may have been covered already but what I can't figure out is how Steven with an IQ of 70 was supposedly able to clean blood/brain/dna from everything(several stabbings/slashing of her throat, moving her between the vehicle, house, garage, and up-to 11 bullet wounds) in the house/garage where ever they claim he committed the murder but somehow left a key(that he cleaned of everything but his own DNA) and bullet laying around that took them months of find in fairly plain sight? I don't know that the guy is innocent but given the involvement of a police dept after they admitted a conflict of interest and has clear motive to incriminate him it's hard to say he's guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. I wouldn't be surprised if that 36m would have effected the whole state and moving the trial to a neighboring county probably wasn't that much more fair because that lawsuit could have hurt them as much as the county being sued. If not exoneration, he should at very least get a re-trial with none of the evidence that Manitowoc County Sheriff's dept was involved in collecting.
I don't know if this has also been mentioned, but one thing that continues to stand out for me is, if Avery did the murder and then did the whole extensive and meticulous clean up, WHY didn't he use their crusher to eliminate the car?
They also apparently had an incinerator on site as well which would have been a much better option for destroying a body than a burn pit.
Seriously, not using this and the car crusher, which makes no sense when combined with the "fact" of Avery's supposed meticulous crime scene cleaning in his house and garage. And, yeah, that key wasn't planted, was it?
Listening to whoever that was (prosecutor) be astonished that someone could actually call a cop dirty was intensely irritating.
thats what doen't make sense? Wouldn't a smelter sufficiently cremate a body ( turn bones to powdery ash ... so they couldn't id who/what the remains are?There is also an aluminum smelter on the property as well. Might as well use a bonfire to burn a body though.
That's something else that didn't make any sense. From what I could understand, they burned the woman in a steel barrel. How do you do that w/o dismembering someone? And even if you could do it that way, how much flammable material would you need to roast an entire body down to just bone?There is also an aluminum smelter on the property as well. Might as well use a bonfire to burn a body though.
That's something else that didn't make any sense. From what I could understand, they burned the woman in a steel barrel. How do you do that w/o dismembering someone? And even if you could do it that way, how much flammable material would you need to roast an entire body down to just bone?
Every time I've seen a funeral pyre, you have about a cord of wood and it's placed UNDER the body. I don't know how much the woman weighed but figure if she was around 100-120lbs, that's still a lot of flesh to burn.
And they keep calling it a bonfire but really it was a fire in a steel barrel. Even with sufficient ventilation via holes in the bottom, you're still going to have a hard time getting a roaring flame unless there's also some sort of accelerant like gasoline, oil or something else.
I don't understand why everyone is trying to use the phone and camera in the burn barrel as additional evidence. One would assume she had those items on her person, and one way or the other would have been in the same place as her body. Especially if framed.
It would be very interesting to know who deleted messages. My understanding of the time frame was after she was missing...but assuming the 'stalking' theories are correct, those messages could have been from Avery and Theresa herself deleted them after listening to them.
Can't be bothered to watch the show or read this entire thread.
Did he do the crime or not?