Originally posted by: Lemon law
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Originally posted by: Doboji
Until we begin holding Palestinians accountable for their war crimes, the conversation about Israelis on trial doesn't have enough merit to even mention.
No, its not that we start with Israel or Hamas first or second, the war crimes trails have to try the various persons responsible at the exact same time. The initial work of making a case against the various miscreants has already been done, next step is to issue the indictments while extraditing them to the proper courts, and then the trials can begin. And as the little rats start to give evidence, others higher up may also fall under the scrutiny of the war crimes trials.
With jonks making a certain point, its rather hard to try a dead suicide bomber. But still on both the Israeli and Hamas side, its also the issue of policy, those that make the policy are even more responsible than those that actually carry the war crimes out. Which strips away any and all justification questions, no matter what, there is no justification for war crimes.
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kvqX4xSaj0
Originally posted by: Lemon law
That self admitted one sided pro Israeli fan boy Jedi Yoda states, "Never happen!!
Again you look to tyhe international community nto do something that even they would NOt allow to happen if it was their people being accused of war crimes!
In effect there is no such thing as the proper courts if a nation chooses to ignore those courts!"
OK OK JediYoda, let Israel renounce the various treaties they are signatories to, let them be a pariah State, because that is certainly what you are advocating. International sanctions at a minimum to follow. I remind you that the UN who created Israel also has the power to un create Israel.
As it is, the Palestinians have reversed position and said they will accept the judgment of the international community, which kinds leaves Israel odd man out.
Let the truth come out which will be a start in the long delayed Mid-east peace process.
Originally posted by: Lemon lawAnd even for those that are pro Israeli fan clubbers, the long terms prospects for the State of Israel are bleak.
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: Doboji
Until we begin holding Palestinians accountable for their war crimes, the conversation about Israelis on trial doesn't have enough merit to even mention.
how do you do that, krazy glue the suicide bomber bodies back together?
Originally posted by: Lemon law
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Originally posted by: Doboji
Until we begin holding Palestinians accountable for their war crimes, the conversation about Israelis on trial doesn't have enough merit to even mention.
No, its not that we start with Israel or Hamas first or second, the war crimes trails have to try the various persons responsible at the exact same time. The initial work of making a case against the various miscreants has already been done, next step is to issue the indictments while extraditing them to the proper courts, and then the trials can begin. And as the little rats start to give evidence, others higher up may also fall under the scrutiny of the war crimes trials.
With jonks making a certain point, its rather hard to try a dead suicide bomber. But still on both the Israeli and Hamas side, its also the issue of policy, those that make the policy are even more responsible than those that actually carry the war crimes out. Which strips away any and all justification questions, no matter what, there is no justification for war crimes.
Originally posted by: Borealis7
international law should be updated to allow sovereign states to defend themselves against organized non-sovereign militias.
because currently, every Hamas terrorist that's killed by Israel is immediately counted as a civilian casualty just because he's not wearing a uniform or has ranks on his shoulders.
one more thing, while Israel clearly has the technological advantage, the intelligence capabilities and firepower supremacy, the Palestinians have the propaganda advantage.
but i expect intelligent people such as the posters on this board to see through all their lies.
in every military operation, and especially in operation Cast Lead, Israel goes out of its way to avoid harming innocent civilians. It even took wounded Palestinians to its hospitals for god's sake! would Hamas do the same if it were the other way around??
Originally posted by: Borealis7
i would've pointed you to the countless videos posted on youtube during Cast Lead operation but youtube is blocked where i work so go find them yourself and see exactly how Hamas fights from within civilian population. Hamas doesnt care about the Gaza population. they are holding them captive at gun point in their insane war against "the zionist oppressor".
while people in the west bank have a lot higher standard of living, they have relative peace and quiet because the IDF has nothing to look for in the west bank. there is a police force there and they manage to keep the peace. no one on the Palestinian side would have to die if only their got their shit together and take control of gaza.
those are not victims of Israel's aggression. those are the victims of Hamas' terrorist policies, unwillingness to negotiate, and the reaction to the incessant firing of rockets on Israeli towns.
lets imagine for a minute, that rouge Mexican terrorists start firing rockets at California and Texas for 8 years. what should the USA do? these terrorists are not Mexican soldiers, the Mexican government cant/doesn't want to control them, and thousands of people live in fear because of indiscriminate rocket attacks.
Originally posted by: Borealis7
so by your words, the USA is guilty of war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan. in war, people die. there's no avoiding it unless you avoid the war altogether.
Originally posted by: Borealis7
of course it was a war! there were 2 sides, each side had weapons etc'. the only difference is one side was an official army bound by international treaties and the other an army of armed men who couldn't care less about their people or international law. and can you imagine that the people of gaza actually elected those idiots?? chances are they will be re-elected too since they use fear to control the population.
i wish the people of gaza would rise up and overthrow the Hamas party. the world would be a better place.
and stop arguing who suffers the most! its pointless!
Originally posted by: Red Irish
Originally posted by: Borealis7
of course it was a war! there were 2 sides, each side had weapons etc'. the only difference is one side was an official army bound by international treaties and the other an army of armed men who couldn't care less about their people or international law. and can you imagine that the people of gaza actually elected those idiots?? chances are they will be re-elected too since they use fear to control the population.
i wish the people of gaza would rise up and overthrow the Hamas party. the world would be a better place.
and stop arguing who suffers the most! its pointless!
You are starting to grasp it. The civilian population is sandwiched between the Hamas terrorists and the Israeli terrorists, sorry, the official army bound by international treaties that is willing to indiscriminately bomb civilian areas - war crime.
Originally posted by: QuantumPion
Originally posted by: Red Irish
Originally posted by: Borealis7
of course it was a war! there were 2 sides, each side had weapons etc'. the only difference is one side was an official army bound by international treaties and the other an army of armed men who couldn't care less about their people or international law. and can you imagine that the people of gaza actually elected those idiots?? chances are they will be re-elected too since they use fear to control the population.
i wish the people of gaza would rise up and overthrow the Hamas party. the world would be a better place.
and stop arguing who suffers the most! its pointless!
You are starting to grasp it. The civilian population is sandwiched between the Hamas terrorists and the Israeli terrorists, sorry, the official army bound by international treaties that is willing to indiscriminately bomb civilian areas - war crime.
I agree totally, you are right on. Except I wasn't aware Hamas was technically an official army and had signed any international treaties?
Also, which Israeli terrorist are you referring to? That guy that assassinated Rabin? I'm not aware of too many others off the top of my head.
Originally posted by: Red Irish
Originally posted by: QuantumPion
Originally posted by: Red Irish
Originally posted by: Borealis7
of course it was a war! there were 2 sides, each side had weapons etc'. the only difference is one side was an official army bound by international treaties and the other an army of armed men who couldn't care less about their people or international law. and can you imagine that the people of gaza actually elected those idiots?? chances are they will be re-elected too since they use fear to control the population.
i wish the people of gaza would rise up and overthrow the Hamas party. the world would be a better place.
and stop arguing who suffers the most! its pointless!
You are starting to grasp it. The civilian population is sandwiched between the Hamas terrorists and the Israeli terrorists, sorry, the official army bound by international treaties that is willing to indiscriminately bomb civilian areas - war crime.
I agree totally, you are right on. Except I wasn't aware Hamas was technically an official army and had signed any international treaties?
Also, which Israeli terrorist are you referring to? That guy that assassinated Rabin? I'm not aware of too many others off the top of my head.
You have reading comprehension difficulties.
Off the top of your head, amongst Israeli terrorists, you can include the politicians and army generals who ordered the Israeli army to bombard civilian areas, resulting in the deaths of over 300 children. How do you define a terrorist, is a media label all that you require or should the actions of the person in question be taken into consideration? I tell you what, if you don't like the term terrorist, I'm willing to settle on war criminals.
Originally posted by: QuantumPion
In all seriousness - When you call every soldier, commander, general, pilot, anyone even remotely connected to the act of any war anywhere, a "war criminal", you render the term completely meaningless.
Were there any Hamas militants in those civilian areas?Originally posted by: Red Irish
Originally posted by: QuantumPion
In all seriousness - When you call every soldier, commander, general, pilot, anyone even remotely connected to the act of any war anywhere, a "war criminal", you render the term completely meaningless.
Sorry, but I didn't do that, I was quite specific: "the politicians and army generals who ordered the Israeli army to bombard civilian areas, resulting in the deaths of over 300 children."
Originally posted by: Common Courtesy
Were there any Hamas militants in those civilian areas?Originally posted by: Red Irish
Originally posted by: QuantumPion
In all seriousness - When you call every soldier, commander, general, pilot, anyone even remotely connected to the act of any war anywhere, a "war criminal", you render the term completely meaningless.
Sorry, but I didn't do that, I was quite specific: "the politicians and army generals who ordered the Israeli army to bombard civilian areas, resulting in the deaths of over 300 children."
Are those crime lords blowing up buses and discos? I have a feeling after sustained suicide bombing attack most of NY would be in favor of clusterbombing the bad areas if the locals didn't give up the baddies. But we can play the hypothetical game all day, so lets stick with reality.Originally posted by: Red Irish
Originally posted by: Common Courtesy
Were there any Hamas militants in those civilian areas?Originally posted by: Red Irish
Originally posted by: QuantumPion
In all seriousness - When you call every soldier, commander, general, pilot, anyone even remotely connected to the act of any war anywhere, a "war criminal", you render the term completely meaningless.
Sorry, but I didn't do that, I was quite specific: "the politicians and army generals who ordered the Israeli army to bombard civilian areas, resulting in the deaths of over 300 children."
Of course. There are crime lords in certain areas of New York. Should we simply bomb the entire zone? I mean, it doesn't matter if we kill a few hundred civilians, so long as we get who we intended to get. This is the argument you are presenting to justify Israel's actions, can't you see how stupid it is?