Nepal sends strong message to terrorists....

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
I'm guessing that they're probably unwanted in the same way illegal immigrants are unwanted.

But I'm guessing that they're needed. Most Arab countries have incredibly large foreign populations in their countries in order to run things.
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
Originally posted by: Sultan
Simple answer: Because they were NOT invited.

Since you are so fond of giving me lessons, why not start off with one now and show me what your compassion for the dead 13000 civilians is...
I'm very interested in seeing a source for this 13,000 civilian deaths that you keep quoting. Got one?
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: Sultan
Simple answer: Because they were NOT invited.

Since you are so fond of giving me lessons, why not start off with one now and show me what your compassion for the dead 13000 civilians is...
I'm very interested in seeing a source for this 13,000 civilian deaths that you keep quoting. Got one?

Well 2200 civilians died in the first Gulf War and most estimates are putting this one far passed that and the conflict is still raging on. In one month alone, 3200 civilians were estimated dead. The first war didn't even have any significant city fighting. This is according to an established AP investigation, not some crazy group.

But those civilians that died had no business to be living on earth.
 

Sultan

Banned
Feb 21, 2002
2,297
1
0
http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/saudi.html

Saudi Arabia maintains crude oil production capacity of around 10.0-10.5 million bbl/d

2 million barrels a day == $80 million. I never mentioned a "grand scheme of things". I said $80 million a day, and Iraq still does not have stable electrical generation, proper infrastructure and clean water.

Convenient that you haven't heard of these things. The UN headquarters in Iraq was bombed and the Red Cross attacked. It was all in the news - maybe the BBC didn't cover it for you?

I never read of a Red Cross attack. Perhaps you would enlighten me. The UN is not a humanitarian organization though it achieves the objective to some degree via other departments. The UN's role has never been a humanitarian one.

As an Iraqi, what would you have us do then? As soon as we leave, the country would become a theocracy, since religious zealots are apparently the only people there with a backbone at the moment. Further, if your family can't get jobs with 140,000 American soldiers there blowing money like there's no tomorrow, how are you going to be better off when they leave? Will they be better off not having our billions of dollars to rebuild their infrastructure so your country can actually stand on its own two feet? If so, I would suspect the Americans there are more than ready to get the hell out. Just convince us that you are, indeed, ready to take things into your own hands.

So if it becomes a theocracy, whats your problem? The 140000 trigger happy soldiers blowing money? Thats a new one. Is that when they were developing the pictures of torturing inmates at Abu Gharib at Baghdad's Walmart? I am yet to see when the "billions" of dollars pledged for infrastructure development will be put into use. I also think the insurgents have made their opinion clear. I also think 1000 coffins back to the United States also proves a point.
 

Sultan

Banned
Feb 21, 2002
2,297
1
0
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: Sultan
Simple answer: Because they were NOT invited.

Since you are so fond of giving me lessons, why not start off with one now and show me what your compassion for the dead 13000 civilians is...
I'm very interested in seeing a source for this 13,000 civilian deaths that you keep quoting. Got one?

http://www.iraqbodycount.net/
 

Sultan

Banned
Feb 21, 2002
2,297
1
0
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
I'm guessing that they're probably unwanted in the same way illegal immigrants are unwanted.

But I'm guessing that they're needed. Most Arab countries have incredibly large foreign populations in their countries in order to run things.

True. But they are also very much unwanted. Saudi citizen unemployment is greater than 25% while the kingdom has over 2 million foreign workers (if i remember correctly)
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
I'm guessing that they're probably unwanted in the same way illegal immigrants are unwanted.

But I'm guessing that they're needed. Most Arab countries have incredibly large foreign populations in their countries in order to run things.

True. But they are also very much unwanted. Saudi citizen unemployment is greater than 25% while the kingdom has over 2 million foreign workers (if i remember correctly)

more like 6-7 million and many of them are in slave-like conditions
 

MegaWorks

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2004
3,819
1
0
As an Iraqi, what would you have us do then? As soon as we leave, the country would become a theocracy, since religious zealots are apparently the only people there with a backbone at the moment. Further, if your family can't get jobs with 140,000 American soldiers there blowing money like there's no tomorrow, how are you going to be better off when they leave? Will they be better off not having our billions of dollars to rebuild their infrastructure so your country can actually stand on its own two feet? If so, I would suspect the Americans there are more than ready to get the hell out. Just convince us that you are, indeed, ready to take things into your own hands.

We don't need the American to build our country, Iraq has enough oil to build itself a 100 times look at the other golf States. The problem with you Americans is that you judge everything based on what you view. Who said that Iraq will become a "theocracy" your analysts plz!!, even Al-Sadr said that he's not intersted in a political position, not even Al-Sistani. Give Iraqis a chance goddammit if you realy consider America the Symbol of freedom.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Originally posted by: Sultan
No, he quoted as an Iraqi, aware of the situation back in Iraq about the want of these foreign workers in Iraq. He stated his opinion about them not being welcome. He in now way stated that this view was held be every single one of the 23 million Iraqis. His opinion however should hold more value than yours, since he has family in Iraq.

Your want of proof cannot be satisfied. There is no legal document signed by every 23 million Iraqis that can say these foreign workers are not welcome. The constant cycle of hostage taking should be enough for an intelligent man to realize he would not be welcome in Iraq or that he is putting his life on the line by going there to make some money.

Yes, it was just his opinion that holds almost no weight.

As I said above, no one "deserves" to die such a death. Too bad. They took a risk and they knew what was on the line. Here's a better analogy: if you had to get to work to make money, but knew your car brakes were broken, and you can only get to work in your car, will you risk it? Your choice. If you do, there's a possibility that you may meet an unfortunate accident. If not, sit at home, look for alternative sources of income.

Or what if you were a policeman? Or a firefighter? There were risks. IT doesn't matter if there were risks or not. Are we even arguing about anything now?

There is no assumption. You have oft clearly stated that this war was justified because of removing Saddam Hussein, even if it was only a side effect.

No, I never stated that and if I did then I no longer believe that. I stated that was one possible benefit. I've said multiple times that it's all about power and money.
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Well 2200 civilians died in the first Gulf War and most estimates are putting this one far passed that and the conflict is still raging on. In one month alone, 3200 civilians were estimated dead. The first war didn't even have any significant city fighting. This is according to an established AP investigation, not some crazy group.

But those civilians that died had no business to be living on earth.
Yes, that's the way - put words in my mouth to make me look like an uncaring bastard. Every civilian that dies is a tragedy, of that no one will argue. I asked for verification regarding the actual number of civilian casualties - does that make me some sort of war criminal?
Originally posted by: Sultan
I never read of a Red Cross attack. Perhaps you would enlighten me. The UN is not a humanitarian organization though it achieves the objective to some degree via other departments. The UN's role has never been a humanitarian one.
Wow? The UN and its forces worldwide provide more humanitarian support than anyone except perhaps the Red Cross (possibly more).

So if it becomes a theocracy, whats your problem? The 140000 trigger happy soldiers blowing money? Thats a new one. Is that when they were developing the pictures of torturing inmates at Abu Gharib at Baghdad's Walmart? I am yet to see when the "billions" of dollars pledged for infrastructure development will be put into use. I also think the insurgents have made their opinion clear. I also think 1000 coffins back to the United States also proves a point.
This makes me question your claims that you're Iraqi at all. If you were, you would know the problem with theocracies, as you'd be familiar with Iran. Any nation with a large military and only 'the Word of God' as a driving force is inherently unstable and a threat to its neighbors.

Your generalization of our troops isn't worth commenting on. The insurgents are a small portion of the Iraqi people, not the majority. If you think Iraq could do a better job rebuilding its infrastructure than can we, as I said, merely prove this to the relevant officials and we'll be more than happy to take our $87 billion, plus $25 billion over the next x months, and be on our merry way. There is nothing that would make America happier than getting out of Iraq. Unfortunately, it is beyond naive to believe that Iraq could stand on its own two legs at this point.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Originally posted by: MegaWorks
You wanted proof that I'm Iraqi I gaved you one, if you don't want to believe that's your problem. You wanted to know why these "workers" are not welcome? The reason is simple they're taking our key postion jobs. Look we don't mind if they they want to work after when the Americans leave our country and then we creat a real sovereignty State, then they're welcome. As for the killing read my previous posts.

You didn't give me any proof whatsoever. You just told me a story about your family.

And even if it were true, it doesn't really matter. Killing hostages is bad. There's no way around it.
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
IT doesn't matter how many people the terrorists kill over there.. it will NEVER match the number of innocents/collateral damage killed by us Americans and British.
 

Sultan

Banned
Feb 21, 2002
2,297
1
0
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Originally posted by: Sultan
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
I'm guessing that they're probably unwanted in the same way illegal immigrants are unwanted.

But I'm guessing that they're needed. Most Arab countries have incredibly large foreign populations in their countries in order to run things.

True. But they are also very much unwanted. Saudi citizen unemployment is greater than 25% while the kingdom has over 2 million foreign workers (if i remember correctly)

more like 6-7 million and many of them are in slave-like conditions

oh well
 

MegaWorks

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2004
3,819
1
0
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Originally posted by: MegaWorks
You wanted proof that I'm Iraqi I gaved you one, if you don't want to believe that's your problem. You wanted to know why these "workers" are not welcome? The reason is simple they're taking our key postion jobs. Look we don't mind if they they want to work after when the Americans leave our country and then we creat a real sovereignty State, then they're welcome. As for the killing read my previous posts.

You didn't give me any proof whatsoever. You just told me a story about your family.

And even if it were true, it doesn't really matter. Killing hostages is bad. There's no way around it.

I NEVER SAID THAT KILLING THEM WAS GOOD! happy now.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Originally posted by: Sultan
Simple answer: Because they were NOT invited.

Since you are so fond of giving me lessons, why not start off with one now and show me what your compassion for the dead 13000 civilians is...

You did not provide any proof or convincing statement that says that any foreign worker in Iraq is not wanted. Are you trying to tell me that the Iraqi people are racists and xenophobic as a whole? And even if it were true, it doesn't matter as it provides no evidence to say that the people have no business there.

I have compassion for anyone that is unjustly killed.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Originally posted by: Sultan
This country invited me because of my skills and qualifications. It deports many out, jails them, or punishes them in whatever manner the law allows. Since there is no means of implementing laws in Iraq, it would be wise for foreigners to understand that such an act can happen to them as well. Those who are there should leave and wait to be invited and those who are thinking of going there should also wait to be invited.

No, I am not implying as such. As I said there is no legal document signed by 23 million Iraqis to satisfy your want of proof. You will not have an understanding based on an Iraqi's opinion, I cannot provide you with a "smoking gun".

I'm not asking for a legal document saying that all 23 million Iraqis want all foreigners out.

Again, unless you are saying that the actions of what I believe is a smaller minority of extremists is actually the actions of the entire people as a whole, then what you have stated means nothing. In addition, it doesn't matter. Mob rule is not always right.

As far as I can see, these people did have business in Iraq.
 

Sultan

Banned
Feb 21, 2002
2,297
1
0
Yes, it was just his opinion that holds almost no weight.

People entering the country illegally, for their own profit take a risk. If they gambled wrong, too bad for them.

Or what if you were a policeman? Or a firefighter? There were risks. IT doesn't matter if there were risks or not. Are we even arguing about anything now?

A policeman, firefighter and the likes do not put their lives on the line for profiting on another's expense, nor do they do so illegally, uninvited.

No, I never stated that and if I did then I no longer believe that. I stated that was one possible benefit. I've said multiple times that it's all about power and money.

Yes, I concur that you have stated the last sentense. The change of terms to "possible benefit" is welcome, though completely irrelevant to the whole reasoning behind invading another country.
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
War is Hell

Why are OUTSIDERS being hired to repair the Iraqis country when the economy there is FVCKED UP and Unemployment is HORRIBLE??

Why aren't IRAQI's being hired for the jobs??? Seems terribly unjust if you ask me.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
People entering the country illegally, for their own profit take a risk. If they gambled wrong, too bad for them.

Many of these did not enter illegally. Anyways, it doesn't matter. They should not have been killed. There is no justification in their killing.

A policeman, firefighter and the likes do not put their lives on the line for profiting on another's expense, nor do they do so illegally, uninvited.

How does a journalist reporting news for France doing soomething at another's expense?
 

MegaWorks

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2004
3,819
1
0
Originally posted by: dahunan
War is Hell

Why are OUTSIDERS being hired to repair the Iraqis country when the economy there is FVCKED UP and Unemployment is HORRIBLE??

Why aren't IRAQI's being hired for the jobs??? Seems terribly unjust if you ask me.

Thats what I'm saying.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Originally posted by: dahunan
War is Hell

Why are OUTSIDERS being hired to repair the Iraqis country when the economy there is FVCKED UP and Unemployment is HORRIBLE??

Why aren't IRAQI's being hired for the jobs??? Seems terribly unjust if you ask me.

Who is paying for these foreign workers anyways? Who is rewarding and paying for the contracts of these companies?

I think these companies should hire some Iraqis. Are they not hiring any of them? Are these companies going to trust their equipment and services to random Iraqis?

They should try to hire some Iraqis, but that doesn't mean that some Muslim extremists should run around and kill foreigners.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Originally posted by: MegaWorks
Originally posted by: dahunan
War is Hell

Why are OUTSIDERS being hired to repair the Iraqis country when the economy there is FVCKED UP and Unemployment is HORRIBLE??

Why aren't IRAQI's being hired for the jobs??? Seems terribly unjust if you ask me.

Thats what I'm saying.

I don't understand it either :confused: It doesn't make sense.
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Originally posted by: dahunan
War is Hell

Why are OUTSIDERS being hired to repair the Iraqis country when the economy there is FVCKED UP and Unemployment is HORRIBLE??

Why aren't IRAQI's being hired for the jobs??? Seems terribly unjust if you ask me.

Who is paying for these foreign workers anyways? Who is rewarding and paying for the contracts of these companies?

I think these companies should hire some Iraqis. Are they not hiring any of them? Are these companies going to trust their equipment and services to random Iraqis?

They should try to hire some Iraqis, but that doesn't mean that some Muslim extremists should run around and kill foreigners.


The reconstruction is being paid for with a lot of Iraqi Citizens OIL and some US $$$. It doesn't mean that innocent workers should be killed - correct.. but it also doesn't help the Iraq economy as much as it does the economy of that where the workers came from.
 

Sultan

Banned
Feb 21, 2002
2,297
1
0
Many of these did not enter illegally. Anyways, it doesn't matter. They should not have been killed. There is no justification in their killing.

I'm sure the hostage takers did all to "minimalize" the loss of life :) Yes, I agree, there is no justification to killing, even if it is for Power and Money.

How does a journalist reporting news for France doing soomething at another's expense?

They are only doing their job. They should not be killed. As I have already said, no one "deserves" to die. For them, they knew the risks involved in the job, just like a policeman or a fireman. I hope they dont get killed.