JeffreyLebowski
Lifer
- Aug 23, 2000
- 15,511
- 1
- 81
Originally posted by: biggestmuff
<blockquote>quote:
Originally posted by: waggy
<blockquote>quote:
Originally posted by: biggestmuff
<blockquote>quote:
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
<blockquote>quote:
Originally posted by: biggestmuff
A wise word of advice:
Think about the type of shotgun that you want to buy to use in a self-defense situation. Depending on where you live, that firearm may have to be turned over as evidence. Now, think again; what type of firearm do you want the prosecution showing to a jury of possibly firearm ignorant people? You want them to see a scary, matte-black, pistol-grip shotgun with a heatshield? So, for home defense, purchase something that looks like a grandfather would use. Something old-school with a wood stock.
People typically choose a firearm that looks cool without thinking of the legal ramifications of their decision. Just food for thought.</blockquote>
Up theirs. I'd rather be tried by twelve than carried by six.
- M4H</blockquote>
I guess you didn't get it. I was simply suggesting that the OP, or anyone else, think about the cosmetics of a firearm before making the purchase. A field shotgun will stop an intruder just as well as a Fabarm FP6 or any other 'tactical' shotgun. When you go to court, that prosecutor will attempt to make you the bad guy by analyzing everything from the gun and the ammo used.
I mentioned the FP6, because that's a shotgun that I own, but I would never pick it up if I heard an intruder in my home.
People take the time to learn all about their firearms and the legalities of carrying, but neglect to study the ramifications of actually using a firearm in a defense situation. And that's what actually matters! </blockquote>
so if your family was in danger you would not pick up the gun to defend them?</blockquote>
No. I would not pick up the Fabarm FP6. I would choose another firearm. I have other firearms.
What does it matter. The prosecutor will be able to get any of your guns as evidence. "Ladies and Gentlemen of the suppossied jury. Mr Robber was brutally attacked by Mr. Biggestmuff, he shot him with his grandfathers old hunting shotgun because it was closer than his FP6 shotgun or any of the other 16 guns he had in the house. This man is obviously a monster and was itching to kill someone that fateful day that Mr. Robber mistakenly entered the wrong house thinking it was his own.
99 times out of 100 a homeowner is not going to be charged with anything for killing or even shooting and injuring an intruder. Civil court is different, but in a country where you can sue someone for a missing pair of slacks, it's to be expected. And in civil court the defendant in the cases usually wins because there was no crime committed.