thats a good question because from the specs alone it really does look like the ImageQuest is the better monitor. Dot pitch, weight, power consumption and Price (by a lot) all favor the ImageQuest.. with the rest of the specs being the same. That's why I bought it. I am not sure how in real life terms it compares the the Samsung, but I would hope favorably, giving all the spec advantages it has over it.
The only thing that I can think of when you bring up Samsung's phrase "It's easy to see why the
SyncMaster 900NF is the most advanced screen in the world." is that it's just a marketing slogan. Companies do that all the time dont they? They say "the #1 maker of so and so.." or "we're the best!" ... does it actually mean they're the best? Either that, or samsung's is really better and the numbers are complete lies.. but I dont think that will be the case.
The only thing that I can think of when you bring up Samsung's phrase "It's easy to see why the
SyncMaster 900NF is the most advanced screen in the world." is that it's just a marketing slogan. Companies do that all the time dont they? They say "the #1 maker of so and so.." or "we're the best!" ... does it actually mean they're the best? Either that, or samsung's is really better and the numbers are complete lies.. but I dont think that will be the case.
