• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Neb Att. General refuses Illegal Aliens a free lawyer.

tyler811

Diamond Member
Quick notes:

Hispanic couple in this country illegally were asked for I.D. while renting an apartment while non hispanics were not.


E.O.C.heard about it and are pissed.They want to go after the landlord.


Neb. A.G. says
"I'm not going to use taxpayer dollars to file lawsuits for illegal aliens," said Bruning after learning the couple was in the U.S. illegally. "You're not going to get a free lawyer" from his office, he said, "if you're not a citizen of this country."

Now:
Critics say Bruning's legal rationale is so off-base that he may end up in court after all ? and not as a prosecutor. Immigration activists suggest they may be laying the groundwork for a first-of-its kind lawsuit, with Bruning as the defendant.


I understand what the landlord did was illegal and discrimination. So fine him or punish him to whatever the law says. Do not however give the hispanic couple free services and send them back.


Here is the full story
 
Originally posted by: TheAdvocate
Constitutional protections apply to citizens.

I have to agree with the AG.

PS - P&N is that way <---

I also have no problem with what the AG did.
 
Raul Gonzalez, legislative director of the National Council of La Raza, a national Hispanic rights group, said Bruning's interpretation would allow people to "run wild over immigrants."

Under Bruning's logic, he said, prosecutors would not seek justice against someone who ran a red light and injured an illegal immigrant.

"They're basically saying it's open season on undocumented immigrants," Gonzalez said.
So you should expect to come here illegally and be treated the same as all the immigrants who bust their asses to get the paperwork through properly?
 
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

Its clear that non cititzens are protected if they are within the jurisdiction of the United States.

Simple soultion is, let them file a suit. And then have INS deport them when they show up.
 
Originally posted by: Wreckem
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

Its clear that non cititzens are protected if they are within the jurisdiction of the United States.

Where does it say they have to be provided a lawyer?
 
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Originally posted by: Wreckem
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

Its clear that non cititzens are protected if they are within the jurisdiction of the United States.

Where does it say they have to be provided a lawyer?

They arent asking for a lawyer and it wasnt the illegal aliens that asked for the AG to get involved. It was infact it the E.O.C. that requested the AG get involved. They are asking the AG to do its job and prosecute the rental company under state laws.

The AG is violating the the whole equal protection of the laws line. If this were to go to court the AG would ultimately lose.
 
i paid lots of money, jumped through many hoops, and waited a long time to get into this country legally and remain legal here. Anytime I hear of lawmakers talking of blanket amnesty to illegal aliens, it pisses me off. It's like a slap across the face for all those immigrants who went the legal route.

Oh and I dont see anything wrong with what the AG did.
 
Originally posted by: Aharami
i paid lots of money, jumped through many hoops, and waited a long time to get into this country legally and remain legal here. Anytime I hear of lawmakers talking of blanket amnesty to illegal aliens, it pisses me off. It's like a slap across the face for all those immigrants who went the legal route.

Oh and I dont see anything wrong with what the AG did.

I know Bush has repeatedly wiped his ass with the constitution, but that doesn't mean everyone else should too just because they are xenophobic.

The fact of the matter is, ANYONE under the jurisdiction of the United States has the RIGHT to equal protection under the law.

Should the illegal couple be deported? Yes.

Should the AG do his job and prosecute the rental company under state laws? Yes.
 
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Originally posted by: Aharami
i paid lots of money, jumped through many hoops, and waited a long time to get into this country legally and remain legal here. Anytime I hear of lawmakers talking of blanket amnesty to illegal aliens, it pisses me off. It's like a slap across the face for all those immigrants who went the legal route.

Oh and I dont see anything wrong with what the AG did.

I know Bush has repeatedly wiped his ass with the constitution, but that doesn't mean everyone else should too just because they are xenophobic.

The fact of the matter is, ANYONE under the jurisdiction of the United States has the RIGHT to equal protection under the law.

Should the illegal couple be deported? Yes.

Should the AG do his job and prosecute the rental company under state laws? Yes.

QFT. What if the AG uses this argument against visa holders who are legally here, but aren't allowed to work and thus do not pay taxes (i.e., select F1 students, tourists, etc.?)
 
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Originally posted by: Aharami
i paid lots of money, jumped through many hoops, and waited a long time to get into this country legally and remain legal here. Anytime I hear of lawmakers talking of blanket amnesty to illegal aliens, it pisses me off. It's like a slap across the face for all those immigrants who went the legal route.

Oh and I dont see anything wrong with what the AG did.

I know Bush has repeatedly wiped his ass with the constitution, but that doesn't mean everyone else should too just because they are xenophobic.

The fact of the matter is, ANYONE under the jurisdiction of the United States has the RIGHT to equal protection under the law.

Should the illegal couple be deported? Yes.

Should the AG do his job and prosecute the rental company under state laws? Yes.

Yep, equal protection has been established for a very long time. Any illegal alien can ask for a free attorney in this situation and be granted it, BUT the fact that they are illegal makes that moot, since if the illegal gets deported they aren't within the US and have no case.
 
So, in theory one could commit murder/rape/theft against illegal immigratns in Nebraska and the AG won't prosecute offenders?
 
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Originally posted by: Aharami
i paid lots of money, jumped through many hoops, and waited a long time to get into this country legally and remain legal here. Anytime I hear of lawmakers talking of blanket amnesty to illegal aliens, it pisses me off. It's like a slap across the face for all those immigrants who went the legal route.

Oh and I dont see anything wrong with what the AG did.

I know Bush has repeatedly wiped his ass with the constitution, but that doesn't mean everyone else should too just because they are xenophobic.

The fact of the matter is, ANYONE under the jurisdiction of the United States has the RIGHT to equal protection under the law.

Should the illegal couple be deported? Yes.

Should the AG do his job and prosecute the rental company under state laws? Yes.

Yep, equal protection has been established for a very long time. Any illegal alien can ask for a free attorney in this situation and be granted it, BUT the fact that they are illegal makes that moot, since if the illegal gets deported they aren't within the US and have no case.

They weren't asking for an attorney.
 
Originally posted by: Phokus
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Originally posted by: Aharami
i paid lots of money, jumped through many hoops, and waited a long time to get into this country legally and remain legal here. Anytime I hear of lawmakers talking of blanket amnesty to illegal aliens, it pisses me off. It's like a slap across the face for all those immigrants who went the legal route.

Oh and I dont see anything wrong with what the AG did.

I know Bush has repeatedly wiped his ass with the constitution, but that doesn't mean everyone else should too just because they are xenophobic.

The fact of the matter is, ANYONE under the jurisdiction of the United States has the RIGHT to equal protection under the law.

Should the illegal couple be deported? Yes.

Should the AG do his job and prosecute the rental company under state laws? Yes.

Yep, equal protection has been established for a very long time. Any illegal alien can ask for a free attorney in this situation and be granted it, BUT the fact that they are illegal makes that moot, since if the illegal gets deported they aren't within the US and have no case.

They weren't asking for an attorney.


The couple ultimately asked Bruning not to prosecute because they feared it would draw the attention of immigration authorities. Their names have not been publicly released.

Because they are here illegally, also the word ultinately leads me to believe they at first did. They changed their minds though after knowing they would get deported.
 
Originally posted by: tyler811
Originally posted by: Phokus
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Originally posted by: Aharami
i paid lots of money, jumped through many hoops, and waited a long time to get into this country legally and remain legal here. Anytime I hear of lawmakers talking of blanket amnesty to illegal aliens, it pisses me off. It's like a slap across the face for all those immigrants who went the legal route.

Oh and I dont see anything wrong with what the AG did.

I know Bush has repeatedly wiped his ass with the constitution, but that doesn't mean everyone else should too just because they are xenophobic.

The fact of the matter is, ANYONE under the jurisdiction of the United States has the RIGHT to equal protection under the law.

Should the illegal couple be deported? Yes.

Should the AG do his job and prosecute the rental company under state laws? Yes.

Yep, equal protection has been established for a very long time. Any illegal alien can ask for a free attorney in this situation and be granted it, BUT the fact that they are illegal makes that moot, since if the illegal gets deported they aren't within the US and have no case.

They weren't asking for an attorney.


The couple ultimately asked Bruning not to prosecute because they feared it would draw the attention of immigration authorities. Their names have not been publicly released.

Because they are here illegally, also the word ultinately leads me to believe they at first did. They changed their minds though after knowing they would get deported.

They weren't asking for an attorney though... the AG prosecutes on behalf of the state.
 
Originally posted by: tyler811
Originally posted by: Phokus
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Originally posted by: Aharami
i paid lots of money, jumped through many hoops, and waited a long time to get into this country legally and remain legal here. Anytime I hear of lawmakers talking of blanket amnesty to illegal aliens, it pisses me off. It's like a slap across the face for all those immigrants who went the legal route.

Oh and I dont see anything wrong with what the AG did.

I know Bush has repeatedly wiped his ass with the constitution, but that doesn't mean everyone else should too just because they are xenophobic.

The fact of the matter is, ANYONE under the jurisdiction of the United States has the RIGHT to equal protection under the law.

Should the illegal couple be deported? Yes.

Should the AG do his job and prosecute the rental company under state laws? Yes.

Yep, equal protection has been established for a very long time. Any illegal alien can ask for a free attorney in this situation and be granted it, BUT the fact that they are illegal makes that moot, since if the illegal gets deported they aren't within the US and have no case.

They weren't asking for an attorney.


The couple ultimately asked Bruning not to prosecute because they feared it would draw the attention of immigration authorities. Their names have not been publicly released.

Because they are here illegally, also the word ultinately leads me to believe they at first did. They changed their minds though after knowing they would get deported.

The E.O.C. was the one that asked. The couple never did, probably fearing deportation.
 
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Originally posted by: Aharami
i paid lots of money, jumped through many hoops, and waited a long time to get into this country legally and remain legal here. Anytime I hear of lawmakers talking of blanket amnesty to illegal aliens, it pisses me off. It's like a slap across the face for all those immigrants who went the legal route.

Oh and I dont see anything wrong with what the AG did.

I know Bush has repeatedly wiped his ass with the constitution, but that doesn't mean everyone else should too just because they are xenophobic.

The fact of the matter is, ANYONE under the jurisdiction of the United States has the RIGHT to equal protection under the law.

Should the illegal couple be deported? Yes.

Should the AG do his job and prosecute the rental company under state laws? Yes.

I have a problem with them not providing proof of who they are. I've seen too many illegals pull crap and then dissapear.

I'm from South Dakota and we have an illegal alien problem here also. Just because the boarder states handle illegals one way doesn't mean we have to do the same.

I know a guy (good friend of my brother) whose girlfirend lived in an small apartment complex for years. Once the illegals starting coming in they had rented all the other apartments there but hers and they were continually harrassing her. I assume they wanted her to move out.

One evening he pulled up and they were harrassing her on her way into her apartment. He went over and told them in no uncertain terms to back off. He ended up getting in a fight with one. A couple days later he went over one evening to visit his girlfriend and they were waiting for him with a gang of people and beat him up so badly he ended up in the hospital for a few days.

He went to the police and tried to get something done, but they wanted names. Nobody knew their names but he said he could identify them. They told him without names they couldn't bring them in?? So nothing was done.

So yeah, show them your ID or get the hell out and fuck La Raza and their whining ass lawyers. Nebraska isn't California, get used to it or get out.
 
Ahh I misunderstood. Need to slow down 😀

"I'm not going to use taxpayer dollars to file lawsuits for illegal aliens," said Bruning after learning the couple was in the U.S. illegally. "You're not going to get a free lawyer" from his office, he said, "if you're not a citizen of this country."

Saw free lawyer 🙂
 
I think if someone is charged with a crime, they can get a lawyer appointed to them. There is a lot of talk whether immigration is a legal matter or a civil matter. I consider it a Legal Matter. No one forced the people from Mexico to come here, so they can go back on their own.
 
Back
Top