waggy
No Lifer
Hey, I don't think Fox is any better. Fox clearly backs one candidate, the rest of the media backs the other.
This is the state of the media whether it be nbc or fox...or you name it.
sad. but correct.
Hey, I don't think Fox is any better. Fox clearly backs one candidate, the rest of the media backs the other.
This is the state of the media whether it be nbc or fox...or you name it.
It sounds like he might be legally retarded. Either that or the rules in the US are radically different from Canada.What viewers didn't see or hear was nearly three minutes of Romney discussing the nightmare of paperwork faced by an optometrist he'd talked to in trying to get the post office to change his address. He expressed mock amazement at Wawa's efficiency to underscore how the private sector often runs circles around the clumsy bureaucracy.
It sounds like he might be legally retarded. Either that or the rules in the US are radically different from Canada.
In Canada, all you need to do is have a bunch of documentation showing that you are you and have mail addressed to you at your new location. I would assume it's similar in the US. They grill the fuck out of you to prevent identity theft; they don't want some random person to claim they are you then have all of your mail directed to their own address.
faux outrage...or please put both fox and nbc examples.
This is the state of the media whether it be nbc or fox...or you name it.
Sad that people blindly believe most of what they are spoon fed on the tv\newspaper\internet and at the same time where else do we look for news\information.
It sounds like he might be legally retarded. Either that or the rules in the US are radically different from Canada.
In Canada, all you need to do is have a bunch of documentation showing that you are you and have mail addressed to you at your new location. I would assume it's similar in the US. They grill the fuck out of you to prevent identity theft; they don't want some random person to claim they are you then have all of your mail directed to their own address.
The government should make address changes as simple as ordering a burger. You just say your name, give absolutely no proof that you are who you say you are, and it gets processed by a 16 year old who doesn't care too much about his job. If a republican proposes a bill stating that people should be required to provide photo identification or at least some proof that you're a legal resident, democrats will jump on him by claiming that this is racist because black and hispanic people don't drive cars (they actually did argue this when republicans wanted photo ID for voting). Those damn racist republicans; how dare they assume that people of all colors drive cars and have jobs and stuff.his point still stands. The private sector does run rings around the government.
A 10 minute phone call with my bank will have them send statements to the new address. Take the bank statements to the post office and have them change it in their computer.from what you say about the system in Canada its more of a redtape headache than the US. how are you suppose to have mail addressed to you at your new location when you cant get it delivered at your new location until AFTER you get your mailing address changed????
please post examples of fox news doing this. NBC has done it 3 times in the not so distant past. Rick perrys black cloud speech, The zimmerman 911 tapes and now this. NBC is a horrible news agency.
The reporter Andrea mitchel (alan greenspans wife), the editor and the producer should be fired.
I've had to change my address a couple times in the US... it's never been terribly difficult, but I always suspect that mail gets lost into the ether (or, more likely, delivered to my old address and thrown out by the new occupants)
I can't fault NBC for editing the clip seeing as the story he was telling is a lie and the actual form is 4 pages long and you have to fill out 2 of them.
please post examples of fox news doing this. NBC has done it 3 times in the not so distant past. Rick perrys black cloud speech, The zimmerman 911 tapes and now this. NBC is a horrible news agency.
The reporter Andrea mitchel (alan greenspans wife), the editor and the producer should be fired.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ortrays-candidate-as-out-touch/#ixzz1yHya3Kee
OOPS! BUSTED NBC!
This isn't a post office change. Here is the 38 page document. Feel free to fill it out if you wish.
http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/CMS-Forms/CMS-Forms/Downloads/cms855s.PDF
What viewers didn't see or hear was nearly three minutes of Romney discussing the nightmare of paperwork faced by an optometrist he'd talked to in trying to get the post office to change his address. He expressed mock amazement at Wawa's efficiency to underscore how the private sector often runs circles around the clumsy bureaucracy.
Good lord, since when has TV journalism, other than PBS or BBC, been any sort of standard for news reporting?
just so we're clear, the pot being black doesn't make the kettle any less black, does it?I can't believe people are taking seriously Faux News' purported outrage. They are the masters and frequent practitioners of selective editing-remember the Obama speeches where they routinely edit out the appalause and edit in a gap, so it appears the audience doesn't agree with what Obama is saying? That's wilfull and intentional distortion with no possible excuse.
Talk about kettle calling the pot black.
just so we're clear, the pot being black doesn't make the kettle any less black, does it?
just so we're clear, the pot being black doesn't make the kettle any less black, does it?
When the pot (Faux News) routinely and as a matter of regular practice purposefully distorts what it airs, as opposed to (at most) a questionable edit on a very minor point, yes it does make a difference, a huge difference.
You can bet your bottom dollar Faux has been hunting high and low for any questionable practice ever commiteed by another network to justify what they do as a noble fight against the mainstream media (and what anyone else would call a propoganda machine).
ok...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGqPxn7njqM
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL814374ED833C9047
http://www.politicususa.com/maddow-fox-news.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-KzzDZo6GY
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/jon-stew...-obama-video-to-criticize-immigration-policy/
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/09/12/kurtz-calls-hannity-deceptive-editing/
make your pick...if you don't think the topic matches then you can search some more and I am sure you'll find something.
But I was not picking on fox...I was picking on media...all of them. I am sure one can find samples.
or follow these links:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=fox+news+edit+videos
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=msnbc+edit+videos
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=cnn+edit+videos
make your pick...they suck for doing that and trying to deceive people.
it does seem though that there's one reigning champion. You decide which.
Exactly.Hey, I don't think Fox is any better. Fox clearly backs one candidate, the rest of the media backs the other.
Uh.. wut?
two wrongs = right. gotcha
"UPDATE: An MSNBC spokesperson emailed the following at 4:30 on Tuesday afternoon:
“MSNBC did not edit anything out of order or out of sequence and at no time did we intend to deceive our viewers.”