GuitarDaddy
Lifer
- Nov 9, 2004
- 11,465
- 1
- 0
Originally posted by: wyvrn
Wow. Kobe isn't even in my top 5 list for MVP. Good thing nobody here actually gets a vote.
I agree, Kobe isn't even close to MVP in my book
Originally posted by: wyvrn
Wow. Kobe isn't even in my top 5 list for MVP. Good thing nobody here actually gets a vote.
My point was that the Suns can hang with arguably the best team in the league with one superstar and one good player, and 3 "role players" (see scrubs). The Pistons D locked them down in the 2nd half which made the difference, otherwise PHO would have ran away with it being up 14 at the half.Originally posted by: iamme
eh, the Pistons won AND they held the Suns 6 points under their season average. plus, the held the Suns to 6-21 three point shooting....not sure how this is an example of how good Nash is.
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
My point was that the Suns can hang with arguably the best team in the league with one superstar and one good player, and 3 "role players" (see scrubs). The Pistons D locked them down in the 2nd half which made the difference, otherwise PHO would have ran away with it being up 14 at the half.
How many other teams in the league have one superstar (or even two), one good player, and 3 scrubs with 53 wins and a 2 seed? Kobe? Lebron? Carmelo? Iverson? Wade and Shaq? Kidd and VC? No to all of em. Nash has done the most for his team with less, which looks like MVP to me.
Agree, Chauncy is better on D but don't think that makes up for the Offensive stats, especially the FG%. That shows that Nash is taking much higher % shots than Billups, which IMO equates to smarter selection.
I had stated that there would be a slight stat inflation but only if players are hitting their shots. And to hit your shots, you have to get good open looks.Originally posted by: iamme
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
I don't agree that your argument for the system making the player, that's absurd. The Suns system doesn't find the open man on the arc, Nash does. The system doesn't make the 3pters, the Suns do. Your reasoning is absolutely absurd IMO. And to say that Chauncey or Kidd could even run a constant run and gun offense isn't factual either. I just saw an interview with Billups where he admitted that Nash is a better passer, and "plays with more energy". There is no guarantee that Billups could even play at such a high energy level in the Suns system and average 35.5 minutes like Nash. If anything, you could argue that the Suns get more looks in a faster offense (hence slightly inflated stats vice slower offenses who don't take as many shots per game), but that has nothing to do with who is finding the open man, let alone draining the shots. It makes it even more impressive that Nash is shooting 51% FG (that's a lot higher than Kobe last I checked) in a high powered offense that gets more shots than traditional half court teams.
on the same token, put Nash on the Pistons, where he'd be expected to play defense, and would the Pistons be a 64 win team? noooo way. therefore, it CAN be argued that Nash thrives because of the offensive system that the Suns implemented.
btw, check out rest of the Suns like Raja Bell and Boris Diaw who's assists jumped because of the Sun's system. more evidence of the system helping players
Originally posted by: GuitarDaddy
Originally posted by: wyvrn
Wow. Kobe isn't even in my top 5 list for MVP. Good thing nobody here actually gets a vote.
I agree, Kobe isn't even close to MVP in my book
Odom is averaging 15, 9, and 5.5 assists. I agree with the article above, IMO Nash would probably elevate Odom in the 21ppg range like Sean Marion (21, 12, 1.8ass). Marion is a slightly better rebounder but Odom is a better passer.Originally posted by: iamme
you make it sound like the Suns have no one. Marion is not just one "good" player. the dude averages 21 pts, 12 reb and a whole lot of fantasy-wet-dream stats. also, Diaw is averaging 13, 6, 7. Raja Bell is averaging 15 ppg. before Kurt Thomas got hurt, he was a very serviceable big guy.
i look at Kobe as having FAR less than Nash does. Odom......then....smush parker? yes, the Suns are better than Lakers, but you make it sound like the Suns are a one man team.
Neo, for one second ignore the record number of 3's made and focus on this: if they are shooting almost 40% from 3pt land as a team, then why the heck shouldn't they rely on it? You can't tell me that a coach wouldn't use the 3 as a weapon if a team like the Suns were absolutely scorching the basket from the arc. Percentage has nothing to do with whether you're "taking too many or not", it measures how many you've made/attempted. If they were making a very low percentage, say <30%, then you could use that argument (that they are taking too many), for the simple fact that they aren't making the shot enough to rely on it. But not at 39-40%, any coach would be nuts not to incorporate the 3 into their scheme at that percentage.Originally posted by: NeoV
I completely stand by my statement that although Nash is a very good player, the Sun's offensive philosophy is the only thing putting him in MVP consideration. To give him credit for the Suns making and taking an NBA record number of 3 pointers is to ignore the fact that they are taking that many 3 pointers in the first place.
Also, those of you saying that Kobe>Jordan are smoking crack...put Jordan in his prime in the league today, with the lack of hand checking, and he goes for 50 a night
Originally posted by: atybimf
Kobe's competitiveness when on the court is matched by no one in the NBA right now.
Originally posted by: Inspector Jihad
Originally posted by: atybimf
Kobe's competitiveness when on the court is matched by no one in the NBA right now.
AI
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Nash Wins. And for good reasons just as I listed above.
