• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Navy to allow woman has SEALs?

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Do you understand the level of the straw man you're constructing here?

A women at an elite level of physical fitness vs an assumed population of couch warriors?

How many of these women are there? How much do they weigh and what is their level of muscle development? I'll bet you a moderately trained male is well ahead of her in raw strength and endurance. Nevermind someone who has made it through BUDS.

If you don't understand why this comparison is completely illogical nothing will sway you. Women will never match up to an equally trained male. It's basic biology and chemistry. Testosterone is a hell of a thing.

So you're saying there is NO woman in the world that is more physically and mentally capable of carrying out SEAL missions versus the current crop of male SEALs? Or for that matter, your specific example of just humping 80lbs of gear around?
 
I think we've watched too many movies where elite female agent of county X meets elite male counter agent of country Y and proceeds to have an evenly matched hand-to-hand battle where they apparently have exactly the same level of strength. That ain't ever happening in real life. IRL he should be able to take quite a few of her best punches, while one good shot from him should put her down or at least severely injure her to the point where she can no longer fight effectively, after which the fight would end quickly. In any grappling situation she should be overwhelmed immediately by his greater strength, while he may be able to muscle his way out of any hold she attempts. It's really an almost insurmountable advantage to be a male fighting a female, assuming both are "elite" level combatants.

I'm not saying that a woman couldn't ever beat such a hypothetical elite male agent, but it wouldn't be in direct hand-to-hand combat. I'd be more likely to believe that he'd just never see her and the killing blow would be a bullet from cover. Although that's pretty damn elite too if you think about it

With out actual real life experience of such a circumstance, we are all blowing hot air, honestly.

If the Navy feels that if a woman could complete the entire training to become a SEAL, which potentially includes hand to hand combat with males, than I'm sure it's rightly justified. I am very familiar with the Navy culture, working for a company with direct contracts building things for them. They are insanely conservative, to the point of it being non rationale. I would think this decision took them years to come to, and is properly researched and justified.

And if it really bugs people that much, a woman SEAL should simply just not be put in missions where the risk of hand to hand combat with "elite" militants is high. Simple.
 
Do you understand the level of the straw man you're constructing here?

A women at an elite level of physical fitness vs an assumed population of couch warriors?

How many of these women are there? How much do they weigh and what is their level of muscle development? I'll bet you a moderately trained male is well ahead of her in raw strength and endurance. Nevermind someone who has made it through BUDS.

If you don't understand why this comparison is completely illogical nothing will sway you. Women will never match up to an equally trained male. It's basic biology and chemistry. Testosterone is a hell of a thing.

Here we go with this "elite" shit again. Stop. Please. That's some shit you read on the back of the CoD game case. "The latest game in the Call of Elite series where you take control of an elite Tier-29 unit, the Stealth Black Gamma-Omega SHARK team, so secret even their own government don't know about them! Play through the non-stop action being elite with elite weapons like the M4, elite HMMWV, elite UH-60 Stealth Blackhawk flown by the elite Special Operations Reconnaisance Elite (SORE) squadron to save the world, elite style." 😀

The military has standards, none of those standards measure using the term "elite". Can the most physically honed female match that of the most physically honed male? No. I don't think anyone is arguing that. Rhonda Rousey would get destroyed by Gregor Clegane, but again, not one's saying that's not the case.

There are standards and those standards have historically favored males and they were developed to weed out the weak males from the stronger males. However, don't think that those standards that have always measured males MUST change to accommodate females. In this case, they appear to have maintained the same standards that males have always met and given the chance, a few females ALSO have now met that standard. Expect more to follow.

Oh, one more edit. I find it highly likely that you guys talking shit about females in the military probably think Ripley from the Alien movie series was a complete badass, yet here we are staring at the real life equivalent of that and you're all "These bitches are weak with periods and stuff. No way man, no way!" You're insecure in your manhood is my suspicion and you're jealous that two women accomplished more than you EVER will, lowered standards or otherwise.
 
Last edited:
If anything they probably have it harder as a lot of the men didn't think they should be there and let them know it regularly. Low and behold one of the two women is suddenly carrying the rifle of her teammate because he was too weak to carry it anymore. 😱
 
I'm aware of her, what "point" are you trying to prove? You just went off on an ignorant rant with all caps and subject spelling of words in your previous post.

You've done a pretty good job of proving your ignorance thus far, but I guess I will make it very simple for you.

Responding to your earlier post, this is a good example of how the USMC will make sure the status quo remains as is. Keep training standards and overall expectations sub par for their women Marines, and there should be a lot fewer worries about one ever passing their officer training.
 
They must be elite now if they are carrying assault rifles, right? Probably have a bunch of extra clips weighing them down too.

:sneaky:
 
Here we go with this "elite" shit again. Stop. Please. That's some shit you read on the back of the CoD game case.

The military has standards, none of those standards measure using the term "elite". Can the most physically honed female match that of the most physically honed male? No. I don't think anyone is arguing that. Rhonda Rousey would get destroyed by Gregor Clegane, but again, not one's saying that's not the case.

There are standards and those standards have historically favored males and they were developed to weed out the weak males from the stronger males. However, don't think that those standards that have always measured males MUST change to accommodate females. In this case, they appear to have maintained the same standards that males have always met and given the chance, a few females ALSO have now met that standard. Expect more to follow.
e·lite
əˈlēt,āˈlēt/Submit
noun
1.
a select part of a group that is superior to the rest in terms of ability or qualities.
"the elite of Britain's armed forces"

Special units like the SEALs and Green Berets are elite. They have training and capabilities beyond that of their peers. Stop pretending because you're a reserve MP you are some super military historian.

You also continue to put forth that the SEALs won't change the standards on women. Based on what exactly? I think the SEALs would hate to do that, but after 20 or 30 women wash out without a single success, one of them is likely to bitch to some commander not involved who will force a standards change for women.
 
I think the SEALs would hate to do that, but after 20 or 30 women wash out without a single success, one of them is likely to bitch to some commander not involved who will force a standards change for women.

You might be right, but until that time happens, they are using the same standards. I mean, it's like saying if enough of the tubby couch potatoe COD males complain they would lower the standards. You can say that for any demographic.

I really doubt THAT many women think they can or even want to join something like the SEALS. Those that do, why not let them. Even if many did, very few are going to pass and those that do, have earned it.
 
You might be right, but until that time happens, they are using the same standards. I mean, it's like saying if enough of the tubby couch potatoe COD males complain they would lower the standards. You can say that for any demographic.

I really doubt THAT many women think they can or even want to join something like the SEALS. Those that do, why not let them. Even if many did, very few are going to pass and those that do, have earned it.

I just fear it will happen. We live in an idiotic society today and the military is no exception to doing stupid shit because one person complained.

I am all for women who complete the current SEAL training being SEALs. Anyone who completes it is able to handle the mental and physical stress required. They are bad ass.
 
You clearly don't understand our doctrine or our mission. MPs are some of the most deployed forces in the world. The Army Reserve makes up the majority of the Military Police Corps. You see us on the large bases because we secure those too. We are there when units arrive, we are there after they leave. You simply don't understand our mission and our OPTEMPO, and that's fine, neither do most others.

The National Guard don't have substantial numbers of Military Police by the way, there's this law on the books called Posse Comitatus, not to mention the Title 10 and Title 32 laws. But keep acting like you know, it briefs well to people on the Internet. While we're at it, if you KNOW like you say you do, go right on ahead and disclose your background like I have so I can KNOW you're full of shit.

Also, who gives a fuck how many females are strong enough? How does that enter into the discussion when two have clearly met that standard of being "strong enough".

Also, can we stop with using this "elite" word, please? It's a made up word in this discussion. It's a media word, not a doctrinal military term. There is no standard in the military in any law, policy, or regulation that specifies someone must be "elite" to be in a certain role. It's a bullshit, weasel word in this case like when racist assholes want to say that a black man "speaks well" to try to sound accepting of their presence in their white washed world. "Oh, she's okay to do that role since she's 'elite' now."

There are different types of "deployments". Living the high life on a big base with a chow hall, having AC, running water, MWR, PX, mail, etc is hardly a deployment to me. You're what we call a "Fobbit". Living life on a FOB. There are zero females in my unit, but that's because we're a combat unit. Where as you have females.

I am not full of shit, I have dealt with this first hand. I just don't go around bragging, that's not me. I don't even like talking about it much. I am not going to go comparing awards and medals with you. I will say I am in the Marine Corps. I have pictures and whatever else to back up anything I say. Elite is a usable word, it is used by the units themselves. But thats besides the point. The point(s) are that inserting a female into a small unit of troops that are entrenched in combat will create problems. I have seen it. And that females are not on average strong enough to do the job of such teams, squads, or whatever else you want to call them. I have seen that too. Linking what I said to being racist is a huge stretch. You're not the first one to ignorantly attempt to slander me like that.

I don't know much about Army standards, except they're easier than ours. For the PFT (Physical Fitness Test) women just this year are allowed to do pullups instead of flex arm hangs for our PFT, the minimum is 3. 55% of women couldn't even do 3. If men can't, they're kicked out. Perfect score for men is 20 pullups, for women it is 9. Women get 3 extra minutes to do the 3 mile run in the PFT. They get no extra time for crunches and they have to do the same amount as men. For the CFT (Combat Fitness Test) women get 46 extra seconds over men to do the 880 yard dash. They only have to do 20 30lbs ammo can lifts where men have to do 45. For the maneuver under fire women get 1:28 more time than men do. For the obstacles course and endurance courses there are separate ones for male and female on things such as the walls, ropes, etc. They are lower, easier to do. Notice a trend? Women do less in just about every single aspect of physical training. Why is that? Draw your own conclusion. Oh, and ZERO women have passed the first day of Marine Corps IOC. The first fucking day. Every single one dropped out. And these were some pretty beastly women, some are athletes from college.

Once again, this is not a slight in any way towards women. If women were as strong and fast as men, we would see them compete with each other in sports. Women would get embarrassed. As I said before, I believe there are jobs women can do better than men. And vice versa. There are things my girl is better at than I am, and I don't care to admit it. Not only is strength and stamina a concern, but I would argue that the bigger concern is the incredibly tight knit brotherhood within a small team or squads. The things that are said in such groups would blow most peoples minds. The logistical issue of having to have separate sleeping, and hygiene quarters. If we're out training we sometimes get tents. Two men to a tent, unless you're higher ranked. Guess what, some brand new PFC female would have to get her own tent. Do you think that would piss off a Cpl? Hell yeah it would, and rightly so. She doesn't rate her own tent. We had one "bathroom" on one deployment, which was half of a 7' hesco. We shit in wag bags and then threw it in a fire just past our wire. We had another just like it, but it was our whack shack. Went in there to beat off. Magazines, and lotion was all that was in there. Crude? Maybe, but it is a part of a mans life. I could go on and on. I fully understand that my experiences are the very small percentage. I also understand that it would be detrimental for a women to be in a place like that.

I bet she (and many others) can do it better than most men in the world.

051215-UFC--Ronda-Rousey-Sports-Illustrated-AS-IA.vadapt.620.high.0.jpg

Do you think she works out almost daily? Has all the supplements she can get? Gets proper sleep? Guess what, that doesn't happen in real war. I lost 30lbs because of those aspects. All the gym muscle from lifting weights and taking protein? Gone. Her and anyone else gets weaker once you are down range without those nice little things. That is just a fact. People on big bases have a gym and the other things. It is like life on States side, fucking Dominos and Burger King. It's pathetic. But that is a different life. The fact is she and anyone else would lose weight and be weaker within weeks. How skinny and strong do you think she is without all that training? Not very strong. On the average a man will be stronger than a female without all the training and extra things it takes to build muscle.

You've done a pretty good job of proving your ignorance thus far, but I guess I will make it very simple for you.

Responding to your earlier post, this is a good example of how the USMC will make sure the status quo remains as is. Keep training standards and overall expectations sub par for their women Marines, and there should be a lot fewer worries about one ever passing their officer training.

You're funny. The standards for women are lower, because they are slower and weaker on average. I pointed out the differences above. If they had the same requirements as men, most women would get kicked out of the Corps. That is a fact. In almost every PT exercise or requirement they get more time, and get to do less reps. There shouldn't be different standards for IOC, are you saying there should be?
 
Here we go with this "elite" shit again. Stop. Please. That's some shit you read on the back of the CoD game case. "The latest game in the Call of Elite series where you take control of an elite Tier-29 unit, the Stealth Black Gamma-Omega SHARK team, so secret even their own government don't know about them! Play through the non-stop action being elite with elite weapons like the M4, elite HMMWV, elite UH-60 Stealth Blackhawk flown by the elite Special Operations Reconnaisance Elite (SORE) squadron to save the world, elite style." 😀

The military has standards, none of those standards measure using the term "elite". Can the most physically honed female match that of the most physically honed male? No. I don't think anyone is arguing that. Rhonda Rousey would get destroyed by Gregor Clegane, but again, not one's saying that's not the case.

There are standards and those standards have historically favored males and they were developed to weed out the weak males from the stronger males. However, don't think that those standards that have always measured males MUST change to accommodate females. In this case, they appear to have maintained the same standards that males have always met and given the chance, a few females ALSO have now met that standard. Expect more to follow.

SEALS, Rangers, Green Berets, SAS, etc are typically elite units. You have to be qualified to even try out for them. Just because they don't use the word in literature doesn't mean that's exactly what they are.

Oh, one more edit. I find it highly likely that you guys talking shit about females in the military probably think Ripley from the Alien movie series was a complete badass, yet here we are staring at the real life equivalent of that and you're all "These bitches are weak with periods and stuff. No way man, no way!" You're insecure in your manhood is my suspicion and you're jealous that two women accomplished more than you EVER will, lowered standards or otherwise.

Ripley was a charcter in a movie, so that example is completely meaningless.

So you're saying there is NO woman in the world that is more physically and mentally capable of carrying out SEAL missions versus the current crop of male SEALs? Or for that matter, your specific example of just humping 80lbs of gear around?

That is exactly what I'm saying. Unless she's taking testosterone supplements, it's pretty much impossible to match the strength and endurance requirements. And carrying around 80lbs of patrol gear all day will demolish a 140lb female. That's more than half her own body weight (57%) to carry around with noticeably less muscle bone density.

A 200-220lb male, it's 40% of his body weight and his genetics have created a hardier body designed for labor.

Anyone can pull a trigger, sure. The problem is getting to where you need to pull the trigger, getting out of where you just pulled the trigger, and potentially having to drag your teammates around during and after.
 
Last edited:
considering that 2 women passed the army ranger program (same qualifications as men), what issue is there with women becoming seals?

if they meet the requirements, then why not let them? these kinds of programs are designed to sort out the toughest of the tough. why does it matter whether you're male or female? and the kind of women who are interested in special ops are not interested in a different set of requirements. they want to pass the same tests as the men

edit: 6ft and 330lbs you are one bigass mofo. a female seal wouldn't have to overpower you. she could just run you out of breath in a few seconds. originally i was going to leave this out, but i feel like it's justified given the language of the OP.

Sorry but you're wrong, the Ranger program standards were lowered for the women participants. It's nothing but a farce!

From the Washington Post:

The Ranger course is among the most intense and demanding in the military. Its participants are expected to operate on limited food and sleep, facing tests of physical endurance, skill and combat in woods, on mountains and in swamps.

The first phase alone demands 49 push-ups, 59 sit-ups, a five-mile run in 40 minutes, a combat survival swim test and a 12-mile road march that must be completed in three hours while the soldier carries dozens of pounds of gear.

Both female officers twice failed to clear the first phase but were allowed to start over. While many men also are allowed to redo a phase, it’s rare — though not unheard of — for soldiers to be allowed to start over from the beginning after failing the same phase twice. Of the 20 women who qualified, only Griest, Haver and a third woman made it to the second phase.
 
Last edited:
There are different types of "deployments". Living the high life on a big base with a chow hall, having AC, running water, MWR, PX, mail, etc is hardly a deployment to me. You're what we call a "Fobbit". Living life on a FOB. There are zero females in my unit, but that's because we're a combat unit. Where as you have females.

blah, blah, blah

Finally, we're getting somewhere. 😀

You and I agree more than we disagree I think. I've NEVER asked for the standards to be lowered, I don't think they were either.

I DO believe that males and females CAN co-exist in a field environment together, in combat situations, and make it work. I've done it. I've known many others who have as well. You've appeared to indicate you've never experienced it, but you seemingly KNOW it's impossible based on what you THINK is true.

I'm also not saying that the SEAL, Green Beret, Rangers, etc., aren't "elite" units. I agree that they are and you're still missing my point. No one measures their ability to meet the standards by some scale with "elite" written on it. They either shoot to a certain standard, or they don't. They either carry so much weight, so far, or they don't. It's not like if they carry more weight, for longer, that they get put on this "elite" scale. They meet or exceed the standard to be a Ranger and they serve in a unit that many call "elite" or of a higher capability than standard units in the force.

And talk all the shit you want Marine, but I GUARANTEE to you that wherever you've rolled out to, there's been an MP that's rolled that route ahead of you as either a route recon element, to establish host nation police in the area, or to conduct canine or customs operations.

My brother is an Army Infantryman and he talked the same shit at first too. This is the same brother just just went through Ranger school and passed the first time all the way through two years ago.

When he rolled across the border into Iraq in 2003 he saw an MP team standing at the top of the breach conducting passage of lines operations. When he rolled into Fallujah, he saw an MP HMMWV already at the Fallujah police station because they'd already cleared the routes on the way up and took up residence conducting law enforcement when the Iraqi police scattered. I can keep going, but I won't or you'll accuse me of bragging instead of telling you what our doctrine has us do in combat.

Maybe Marine MPs are so few and far between that they check IDs at the gates and roll around in patrol cars, but Army MPs do that as an extra duty. Oh, and at age 39 I can do your Marine PT test, no sweat. I'm a Reservist. I train to a higher standard when not all of us do.
 
So, what you're saying is, the two women who passed the Ranger school deserve to be called Rangers?

Given that they'll be prohibited from serving in a Ranger unit (75th Ranger Regiment primarily), their earned Ranger tab that they get to wear will certainly give them credit over others. They won't commonly be referred to as Rangers in their units of assignment though.

I have Lieutenants that have earned Ranger tabs, I certainly don't fucking go around calling Lieutenants "Ranger" because of it. They're just Lieutenants that maybe, sometimes have more common sense in a field environment for having completed Ranger school. Same with my NCOs who have earned the tab. I also don't call my brother Ranger either.

What was your point again?
 
i heard having a Ranger tab really helps your career as an officer. And that prohibiting women from getting it hurts how high they can go. Is that true?
 
i heard having a Ranger tab really helps your career as an officer. And that prohibiting women from getting it hurts how high they can go. Is that true?

Not true as stated. Having a Ranger tab is a career enhancer, however, it is not a blanket pass to higher positions of rank or authority.

If two officers are otherwise equal in every way, but one has a Ranger tab and the other doesn't, that MIGHT sway a decision, but it is so rare that things come down to that in most boards.

These two women certainly SHOULD benefit from having achieved this accomplishment, but sadly they'll more than likely have to constantly endure scrutiny from others. Never mind that I know at least one Soldier who earned a Ranger tab, but has recently failed a PT test to attend a school for promotion.
 
No, but plenty of missions require humping 80lbs+ of gear over mountains. Women aren't going to be able to do that anywhere near as well as men.

You mean like volunteering to carry extra weight when your squadmate can't go anymore, and the rest of your (male) squad members are too tired to help out?

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/male-rangers-credit-females-helping-pass-article-1.2332373

It was while they were on an excruciating 12-mile hike, carrying 50 pounds on their backs plus water and any other supplies, that two of the male rangers say they requested help.

It was the women who provided a hand.

:hmm:
 
Last edited:
You clearly don't understand our doctrine or our mission. MPs are some of the most deployed forces in the world. The Army Reserve makes up the majority of the Military Police Corps. You see us on the large bases because we secure those too. We are there when units arrive, we are there after they leave. You simply don't understand our mission and our OPTEMPO, and that's fine, neither do most others.

The National Guard don't have substantial numbers of Military Police by the way, there's this law on the books called Posse Comitatus, not to mention the Title 10 and Title 32 laws. But keep acting like you know, it briefs well to people on the Internet. While we're at it, if you KNOW like you say you do, go right on ahead and disclose your background like I have so I can KNOW you're full of shit.

Also, who gives a fuck how many females are strong enough? How does that enter into the discussion when two have clearly met that standard of being "strong enough".

Also, can we stop with using this "elite" word, please? It's a made up word in this discussion. It's a media word, not a doctrinal military term. There is no standard in the military in any law, policy, or regulation that specifies someone must be "elite" to be in a certain role. It's a bullshit, weasel word in this case like when racist assholes want to say that a black man "speaks well" to try to sound accepting of their presence in their white washed world. "Oh, she's okay to do that role since she's 'elite' now."

You clearly don't understand this thread isn't about MP's to begin with.

If you're not "Elite" enough to be a Ranger or a Seal, get over yourself.

L37Y6qN.jpg
 
Last edited:
Finally, we're getting somewhere. 😀

You and I agree more than we disagree I think. I've NEVER asked for the standards to be lowered, I don't think they were either.

I DO believe that males and females CAN co-exist in a field environment together, in combat situations, and make it work. I've done it. I've known many others who have as well. You've appeared to indicate you've never experienced it, but you seemingly KNOW it's impossible based on what you THINK is true.

I'm also not saying that the SEAL, Green Beret, Rangers, etc., aren't "elite" units. I agree that they are and you're still missing my point. No one measures their ability to meet the standards by some scale with "elite" written on it. They either shoot to a certain standard, or they don't. They either carry so much weight, so far, or they don't. It's not like if they carry more weight, for longer, that they get put on this "elite" scale. They meet or exceed the standard to be a Ranger and they serve in a unit that many call "elite" or of a higher capability than standard units in the force.

And talk all the shit you want Marine, but I GUARANTEE to you that wherever you've rolled out to, there's been an MP that's rolled that route ahead of you as either a route recon element, to establish host nation police in the area, or to conduct canine or customs operations.

My brother is an Army Infantryman and he talked the same shit at first too. This is the same brother just just went through Ranger school and passed the first time all the way through two years ago.

When he rolled across the border into Iraq in 2003 he saw an MP team standing at the top of the breach conducting passage of lines operations. When he rolled into Fallujah, he saw an MP HMMWV already at the Fallujah police station because they'd already cleared the routes on the way up and took up residence conducting law enforcement when the Iraqi police scattered. I can keep going, but I won't or you'll accuse me of bragging instead of telling you what our doctrine has us do in combat.

Maybe Marine MPs are so few and far between that they check IDs at the gates and roll around in patrol cars, but Army MPs do that as an extra duty. Oh, and at age 39 I can do your Marine PT test, no sweat. I'm a Reservist. I train to a higher standard when not all of us do.

We may agree on most things, but I will not change my stance on females down range, in combat, in small squads or teams. You mentioned FET earlier, we got two of them for about two weeks, Sgt and Cpl. We didn't have roads to where we were. We had to hump 13 clicks to pick them up. They had their ruck and day packs, with all other gear. Same as when we got dropped off. They couldn't make it. We had to carry their fucking packs for them. When crossing canals, they would hand off their weapons! You don't fucking do that. On patrols they were slow and shit, had terrible situation awareness, not at all tactical, just terrible to have where we were. When patrolling we carried and AT4, two LAW's, and spread load the 1000 rounds of 7.62 for the 240G. We also had a SAW gunner who had 500 rounds and an A bag. We only went out with 8 at a time and a few ANA. These FET's were a liability. They couldn't help carry the extra weight and had no idea how to fire a rocket. Could other females have performed better? I am sure of it. They were pathetic. It also created a problem at our PB. We had 12 Marines and a Corpsman, the PB was about 30x40 yards. Mud walls, hesco and c-wire. We didn't have tents, we had one mud room where the COC was. We didn't have electricity, running water, nothing. We had to make that 13 click hump about twice a week, carry the dead batteries back and get charged ones. Our water and MRE's were air dropped. Not where they land and unload, where they hover and kick them out because the area was so hot. I have videos, then we had to go pick up the shit and hump it back. We didn't have any tents, nothing, just cammie netting. We slept on cots and were in our silkies every minute of the day other than when patrolling. Which we did two 4+ hour patrols a day. Having two females there for the two weeks was extremely hard. Not only because they just sucked at combat/field Marines, but because we had to watch what we did. They slept by us because they had to. It made everything uncomfortable, they were honestly bitches. All the time complaining, and eventually made coms to their higher up to go back. So we had to carry their fucking packs back because they couldnt do it. We got them so they could search females, not even worth it. So yeah I have had only one experience, and I realize that it is an extreme one. I have no issues with them doing 99% of the jobs in the Marine Corps, just not in situations like we had. It is a liability and a nightmare in the PB.

I do know for a fact that there were no Army MP's out there clearing the way, making relations. At the time we were the southern most deployed unit in the Helmand, out of anybody. I dont doubt MP's have done what you say in the past or with other units, just not with us. We only worked with the Army once, a ground clearance team. They had vehicles, whole convoy. Was a huge mission trying to make way to the Safar Bazzar. First day a vehicle got hit. Their Captain CRIED, and said they couldn't complete the mission. They pulled back. So we did it on food with CMD's, k-bars, and Holley sticks. I can give you a whole story on the birth of the Holley stick which saved countless lives. We lost 3 Marines clearing that road, but whatever the Captain is safe.

I admit I have limited experience with females and the Army but I have a sour taste from each. Is it fair? No, I know there are great Females Marines and great Army units. I am just passionate about what I believe in with my experiences. I don't have doubts you can pass the PT test, it is not really hard. What is hard is to get a perfect 300 score. The CFT will kick anyone's ass, I have thrown up twice after, putting it all out there. The point I was making is that the females get to do less with more time in virtually every test. There is a reason for that.
 
Back
Top