• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Nationwide Protest against bush's illegal occupation!

Page 15 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
not really you are the one who asked for it.
I trust what I hear firsthand from friends in the service.
local independent media I trust to a certain degree.
the big media is sold out for ages I trust it as much as a report straight from the pentagon itself.
(which it is) very biased to the military industrial complex who owns it.
But, what I see on the tv they have at the corner store and what I
hear from the people there is two diffrent worlds.
I would be VERY suspicious, do you know what pravada was?
same deal.
 
Originally posted by: Sphexi
As far as saying it's a fight of rebels v. an Empire (nice capitalization btw), this isn't Star Wars. We're not out for oppression of all peoples in the world, and the "rebels" certainly out for freedom of their country. I don't remember the Rebels in Star Wars ever killing their own people out of spite or hatred, and I certainly don't remember them committing mass murder against innocents. The rebels in Iraq most certainly do not stand for freedom or any kind of justice, they simply stand for hatred and violence. The last group of rebels that actually wanted what was best for Iraq disbanded and disarmed almost a year ago now, and have since worked into the new government in an effort to actually better their country, not destroy it and those who live in it.

So once again, spout what you like, it's not going to change a single thing. We're there for at least the next 4 years, and when the next President is elected (a republican he will be btw), we'll be there for as long as it takes. I'd say when we go 6 months without a single US soldier being killed, then we can leave. Until then we'll continue stomping ass.
I am not talking about the geek wet dream that is Star Wars. The fantasy of limp-dicked little upper-class white boys that live a coddled life. I am talking about the continuing battles of the oppressed nations in the Middle East and South Asia against the Imperial might of the Western Power(s).

I certainly remember Star Wars being a 1:45 long movie that displayed the highlights of a rebel force engulfed in a climactic battle against an enormously powerful enemy. If you were to show a 1:45 minute movie of any rebellion it would of course be glorious and beautiful. But who knows what happened in between? What dark secrets the rebels held. Real-life is not Star Wars, it is imperfect. The battle against foreign nations imposing their view of life, their will, their philosophy of how things should be done is a real battle many nations face today and it is one that Iraq is facing today. Sometimes informants must be killed, sometimes civilians are hit by bombs intended for the enemy. Just as supporters of the other side indulge in the philosophy of "Collateral damage only for our side" so do the supporters of the other.

Just as you call the modern Europeans and ancient Indian philosphers "spineless" and "weak-willed". "Elitists" trying to push their views on us. So do the Iraqi rebels view us. Except we have taken the gauntlet to them. We have not engaged in dialogue, we have engaged in outright battle. Tell me, if tomorrow France was the new world power, and was to find us a "rogue nation", a "nation with manufactured evidence", "a backwards nation led by a maniac in need of a regime change", what would your response be as a proud American? Surely it would be to take to the streets, armed and willing to fight. Because that would be my reaction my friend.
 
I don't see anywhere in my post where I said a single thing about Europe. I merely mentioned Starwars because you happened to capitalize "Empire", which I felt was fairly amusing.

I happen to respect Europe fairly highly, especially France, since they stuck to their guns of protesting our little war in Iraq, since they'd be losing out on a lot of the contracts they had previously setup with Saddam. Poor France, losing all that money 🙁

Seriously though, I have no real problem with them. They're accusing us of pretty much the same thing they've been guilty of in the past. Both England and France (as well as Spain/Portugal and so on) had colonies and ran countries on the opposite side of the world, thus becoming an Empire. The biggest difference between us and them is that they didn't intend to stop running those countries, we don't really want to be running Iraq. Iraq has their own government, will be setting up their own judicial system, and will be taking care of their own matters as they come up, hopefully allowing us to leave and go stomp ass elsewhere in the general vicinity.

As far as the Iraqi people go, if they really saw us as an evil invading force, a lot more of them would be rising up to throw us out. Fact is that it's a small minority of people who are either too scared of their leaders or too stupid to think for themselves that want us out, and not so they can free Iraq, but so that they can take over and place the country back under a dictatorship, probably freeing Saddam from prison so he can go back to shooting random people at will.

So I don't really have much in the way of pity for certain European countries, which in the past have done one thing and now say another. Such is life, and it'll continue like that for the rest of time. There will always be people who don't agree, and there will always be people trying to rule over the weak, best we can hope to do is to spot them before they get too bad and snuff em out fast.
 
Originally posted by: Sphexi
I don't see anywhere in my post where I said a single thing about Europe. I merely mentioned Starwars because you happened to capitalize "Empire", which I felt was fairly amusing.

I happen to respect Europe fairly highly, especially France, since they stuck to their guns of protesting our little war in Iraq, since they'd be losing out on a lot of the contracts they had previously setup with Saddam. Poor France, losing all that money 🙁

Seriously though, I have no real problem with them. They're accusing us of pretty much the same thing they've been guilty of in the past. Both England and France (as well as Spain/Portugal and so on) had colonies and ran countries on the opposite side of the world, thus becoming an Empire. The biggest difference between us and them is that they didn't intend to stop running those countries, we don't really want to be running Iraq. Iraq has their own government, will be setting up their own judicial system, and will be taking care of their own matters as they come up, hopefully allowing us to leave and go stomp ass elsewhere in the general vicinity.

As far as the Iraqi people go, if they really saw us as an evil invading force, a lot more of them would be rising up to throw us out. Fact is that it's a small minority of people who are either too scared of their leaders or too stupid to think for themselves that want us out, and not so they can free Iraq, but so that they can take over and place the country back under a dictatorship, probably freeing Saddam from prison so he can go back to shooting random people at will.

So I don't really have much in the way of pity for certain European countries, which in the past have done one thing and now say another. Such is life, and it'll continue like that for the rest of time. There will always be people who don't agree, and there will always be people trying to rule over the weak, best we can hope to do is to spot them before they get too bad and snuff em out fast.
So I'm assuming you are throwing yours in with the Shi'ites and Kurds. The most unsecular, and 'unfree' of the bunch. You do know that in Sunni Iraq; women could divorce and keep custody of children, women didn't have to wear veils or burkahs, secularism was pushed forward, and religion in government was frowned upon? Did you ever think that the Sunni's could be fighting against the rise of a Shi'ite/Kurd theocracy in Iraq?

Naaaaah. They're all terrorists aren't they? A great way to group your enemy. I think I just heard Goebbels clap somewhere in the dim annals of hallowed antiquity.
 
Once again, you're putting words into my mouth 🙂...but that's okay, it's really the only way you can make any kind of a point.



As I've said before, I honestly don't care one way or the other about what happens to ANY of the people in Iraq. I don't side with one bunch or the other, I side exclusively with our troops. If someone shoots at them, they shoot back to kill. That's the only thing they have to worry about right now, and the sooner the Iraqis figure out that to get us to leave the smartest thing to do would be to stop fighting back, or at least behave until we leave (at which point they can do whatever they like), the better it'll be for them.
 
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: Sphexi
I don't see anywhere in my post where I said a single thing about Europe. I merely mentioned Starwars because you happened to capitalize "Empire", which I felt was fairly amusing.

I happen to respect Europe fairly highly, especially France, since they stuck to their guns of protesting our little war in Iraq, since they'd be losing out on a lot of the contracts they had previously setup with Saddam. Poor France, losing all that money 🙁

Seriously though, I have no real problem with them. They're accusing us of pretty much the same thing they've been guilty of in the past. Both England and France (as well as Spain/Portugal and so on) had colonies and ran countries on the opposite side of the world, thus becoming an Empire. The biggest difference between us and them is that they didn't intend to stop running those countries, we don't really want to be running Iraq. Iraq has their own government, will be setting up their own judicial system, and will be taking care of their own matters as they come up, hopefully allowing us to leave and go stomp ass elsewhere in the general vicinity.

As far as the Iraqi people go, if they really saw us as an evil invading force, a lot more of them would be rising up to throw us out. Fact is that it's a small minority of people who are either too scared of their leaders or too stupid to think for themselves that want us out, and not so they can free Iraq, but so that they can take over and place the country back under a dictatorship, probably freeing Saddam from prison so he can go back to shooting random people at will.

So I don't really have much in the way of pity for certain European countries, which in the past have done one thing and now say another. Such is life, and it'll continue like that for the rest of time. There will always be people who don't agree, and there will always be people trying to rule over the weak, best we can hope to do is to spot them before they get too bad and snuff em out fast.
So I'm assuming you are throwing yours in with the Shi'ites and Kurds. The most unsecular, and 'unfree' of the bunch. You do know that in Sunni Iraq; women could divorce and keep custody of children, women didn't have to wear veils or burkahs, secularism was pushed forward, and religion in government was frowned upon? Did you ever think that the Sunni's could be fighting against the rise of a Shi'ite/Kurd theocracy in Iraq?

Naaaaah. They're all terrorists aren't they? A great way to group your enemy. I think I just heard Goebbels clap somewhere in the dim annals of hallowed antiquity.


I think you could be just as wrong as I was with the casualties/deaths mixup. Pre-gulfwar this might have been true but women in Iraq lost much of their gained freedoms afterwards.

For reference: http://www.hrw.org/backgrounder/wrd/iraq-women.htm
 
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: mwtgg
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
nah, I am over going to jail for childish pranks.

At least we agree that it's childish...

You have every right to peacefully protest, but blocking traffic is not peaceful and it's unfortunate that you try to dismiss your behavior as necessary.
Blocking traffic is indeed peaceful. Look up violent in the dictionary. It is also a very good way to get your message across.

peaceful:
2: peacefully resistant in response to injustice; "passive resistance" [syn: passive] 3: (of groups) not violent or disorderly; "the right of peaceful assembly" [syn: law-abiding]
disorderly:
3: Law. Disturbing the public peace or decorum.

Show me one law/ordinance/statute where standing in the street is lawful.

Originally posted by: Steeplerot

maybe you can call the sfpd and whine to them
they are not falling into foxnews' standard line.
I am sure they will laugh at you like people in here do. :cookie:

I guess you showed us! :roll:

Originally posted by: Steeplerot
the whole iraqi elections bit from news tv.
it's as fake as the toppling of the saddam statue and you buy it hook line and sinker.
which makes you a kool-aid drinker.
You believe the enterntainment news of corporate media
instead of informing yourself with the truth on matters.

What news service would you suggest? Some AOL member page, the Washington Post?

Speaking of the Washington Post, you're all against corporate media, why not the Washington Post?

The company owns The Washington Post, The Gazette Newspapers (Maryland), The Herald (Everett, Washington), Newsweek, television stations in Detroit, Houston, Miami, Orlando, San Antonio and Jacksonville, and cable systems serving subscribers in midwestern, western and southern states.

The company also owns Kaplan, Inc., a leading provider of educational and career services
 
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: exdeath
"People who say money can't buy happiness just don't know where to shop."
That is all I need to know about you my friend. Have you sold your soul yet?

Soul? I guess you mean that soup of chemicals and nerve fibers that deteriorate and cease operation when you die. No, I still have all that, until the day I die and I stop functioning biologically.
 
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: exdeath
Don't like Bush or this country?

Move.

There is only one country in the world like the USA and if you can't see the better parts of it, LEAVE.

There are plenty of socialist/pacifist havens in other parts of the world that might cater to you:

Europe, Cuba, Sweden, California, etc.

There are 100s of places that you might like better, but there is only one USA and I choose to stay here. How dare you try to destroy it. I have no where else to go.




My only complaints regarding Bush are:

1) Why only Iraq? Lets take care of Saudi, North Korea, Iran, etc.

2) Keep illegals OUT. I could care less about legitimate immigrants wanting work, but the ones that come here illegally think they are entitled to free handouts from our government and make my taxes higher. They also think because they arent citizens they don't have to obey our laws, do whatever they want, and scurry back to Mexico so they can't be held acountable. Oh yeah, drive a 6000 lb truck at 90 mph in a 35 weaving in and out of cars, pushing people off the road, rear end somebody, and run; then go home and laugh about it with your friends with a few beers.

3) Stop with the 'every life is precious' bullshit and don't interfere with private matters (abortion, the Terri Shaivo thing, etc) Some lives ARE worth more than others, some people are better of not living and should have the right to choose, and no life is worth more than certain things like, say, the liberties provided by the constitution. Life is not THAT precious; it is actually quite cheap and abundant.

Ladies and gentlemen, the classic example of a nationalist/racist type of Republican. These Republicans don't want new people coming to this country (and though I'm against immigration this overlaps frequently with them with racism). They think the US should nuke everyone and are as anti-christian values as you can get.

Most certainly not racist, but if you can come to Tucson, AZ and show me where increasingly large numbers of anonymous Vietnamese, Canadians, Chinese, Africans, Iraqis, Russians, Indians, or even Canadians (since they share a border) are sneaking across the border and nonchalantly disregarding even the most common laws and scurrying into hiding like roaches en mass in order to avoid any accountability or responsibility when they cause damage or injury to someone else, I'll consider your judgment.

Don't confuse racism with political incorrectness. Calling a spade a spade when you see a spade and not trying to make polite out of a known issue is a little different than the blind illogical hatred based on genetics that racism is.

If you curious as to my solution, it isn?t nuking Mexico either, not putting a wall up or any of that nonsense. Simply take away the incentive that drives them to come here illegally. Try abolishing welfare and other socialist programs and holding anyone in this country accountable to the law regardless of citizenship or not, instead of slapping them on the wrist and deporting them so they can come back again tomorrow unpunished. The problem is they want all the benefits of being a citizen (free government handouts, higher wage jobs, American quality of life) with the immunity that comes from not being a citizen (don?t have to obey laws, no taxes, paid under the table, etc); this is unacceptable. American citizenship isnt a salad bar that you can pick and choose what benefits you and leave the rest.

I am not religious at all. As far as christian values, I would say that most of those values are common sense, but I despise religion. Anything that can cause a person to make major decisions while disregarding facts and logic is the root of evil, and religion seems to be a major cause of problems in the world. For you christians, I do know however that the original christian commandment is not "thou shall not kill" it was "thou shall not murder" and there is a clear distinction between killing (taking life, sometimes even mandated in the bible) and murder (killing out of spite, malice, hatred, etc) and regardless of how horrible or great you think killing someone is, there are factions of people in the world that can only be dealt with by death. Why? Blind religious devotion causes them to ignore any rational thought or compromise. It isn't pretty, but thats how it has been for how long now?

Evil is simply evil, hell-bent on destroying everything including themselves to achieve something, or nothing. Good is exercised by someone who, bound by no religious or moral obligations is capable of either good or evil, willfully chooses to be good, regardless of personal gain or loss. Such a person also acknowledges that there is evil in the world that can only be dealt with via evil, however unpleasant.

An exceptional display of this is an American soldier killing 100s of islamofacists and 5 minutes later comfort an injured stranger in Iraq.

All I'm saying is there are alot more places in the world than Iraq, and I don't like Bush's policy that Iraq is the only bad place in the world worth using the big stick on when there are other places, some even more dangerous. One theory is that seeding freedom in the middle east will cause a muslim uprising that will spread freedom and prosperity like a plauge just like it did in the former soviet union... but I'm not that patient when it comes to people making threats to me. Your mileage may vary.
 
then get off your elitest racist "political incorrectness" trip and wake up.
You are no better then the fascist you want to see gunned down so bad. your just hiding behind a flag.
 
I can't believe I actually read this whole thread. I was actually amazed and pissed off at what was being said in this thread. I'm seriously angry as I write this post.

This basically sums it up:
"How does laying down in traffic and stopping a city for 2 hours promote your cause?"
"Wake up and stop watching TV"

That?s basically it.

Here's what I think of the situation. I think that war protesters who go to these huge gatherings and disrupt the daily lives of other people are out of touch with reality. I think the problem is that my generation (I'm 23) has never had a cause and may of us have grasped at the war in Iraq to be our way to rebel against the government.

I ask, how will stopping traffic in a city, yelling things at people, violence against the police or telling people that they are blind and need to stop watching TV solve anything? I want an answer. Don't tell me to stop watching TV, don't tell me to stop buying the corporate media, don't call me a lemming, tell me how this will solve anything. Explain it to me, don't yell in my face and insult me. I consider myself an educated person and expect to be treated as such if you wish me to listen.

Personally I think that protesters are quite possibly the biggest lemmings around. You stated in one of your earlier posts, "I won't debate numbers" when speaking of the 5,500 service men and women who did not wish to go to Iraq. Don't want to debate numbers? Are you even serious? How can debating the FACTS of a situation EVER be wrong or irrelevant? I find that most people who are anti this and anti that really have little idea of the FACTS behind a situation. Instead they insinuate that everybody who does not agree with them is "blind", "a lemming", "buying into the corporate media". I won't pretend for a minute that the media does not have a profound, manipulative effect on everybody's lives, but people are still individuals and still have their own opinions.

Now here is my second question. Lets assume for the moment that we all agreed that the war is bad and Iraq needs to be left alone. ?Bring the troops home? as you said. How could we possibly do this? You want us to just leave Iraq now that we've caused the situation over there? How could we possibly just leave with the country in the state it is in? Nothing against Iraq, but do you think they are politically, militarily and social able to support their own country without it falling into chaos? The USA leaving now would throw the country into even further chaos than it already is in, that is not a realistic option.

You want to protest the war, fine, give a better solution to the situation at hand or nobody will take you seriously.

I?d like a reply to my questions. Like I said before, don?t call me a fool, idiot, tell me to stop watching TV, believing corporations or anything like that, I want a straight answer. We are all educated individuals here, insults are not necessary. If you cannot do that, then in my opinion, your opinions have no validity if you cannot support them.
 
Of course you're angry-- you're conservative. And stop acting like you represent all people in their 20s. There are tons of twenty-somethings who are adamantly opposed to the war. All your other issues have been dealt with ad nauseum.
 
Yes that must be it, I must be conservative. There couldn't be any possible explanation that I'd want things explained, you're so insightful. I guess in your limited view the only way to view things is conservative=bad, liberal=good.

I don't consider myself either, to put a label like conservative or liberal to describe all of my political and social views is idiotic and impossible. I listen to each situation and make up my OWN mind.

I didn't vote for Bush and I don't think we went to Iraq for the right reasons, however we are there now and have a responsibility to help rebuild the country.

I never said I represented everybody in their 20's, what I said was that I'm in my 20's and MY OPINION is that the reason this is such a hot topic with people my age is because its the first kind of thing like this to happen that we've been alive for.
 
infohawk, try and avoid the sweeping generalizations. This country is about 50/50 rebulican/democrat. I don't think that you can really say that one side has no backing behind what they do. He posted his opinion and didn't insult anyone. Either answer his questions or sit back and let others please. For the last few posts this has actually stayed civilized without too much in the way of insults being tossed at eachother. Lets not start that again
 
wrong, this country is about 30% rep becasue of scare tactics the rest either dont care or are dems.
If you didnt notice the vast majority of this country is very unhappy with the right-wing and bush.
 
Steeple. Again, please orove this, It is thngs like this that you say that cause people to not respect your opinion in others. You are saying that people voted Bush into a second term because of scare tactics? I have yet to see anyone that was scared to go vote anything other than republican. Please show me some facts on this that will orove your point. And don't show me some statistic about how many are happy with the War in Iraq, that does not prove a republican/democrat percentage.

Just because someone is unhappy with bush doesn't mean they are not republican. You sound like you try and make being republican wrong. There are two major sides for a reason, because there is always at least two stances to take.
 
If you can't see the fearmongering stick around.
The only thing the right has to go on anymore IS fear.
fear of a muslims fear of elitest liberals fear of any boogeyman they need to drag out when their popularity sags.
The right-wingers have nothing else BUT fear.
I could care less if your "respect" my opinion like I said earlier I am not here to please anyone. I am not running for office.
Someones tagline in here said something like. "I would rather be ignored with the truth then worshipped through lies."
 
Originally posted by: rleemhui
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: Sphexi
I don't see anywhere in my post where I said a single thing about Europe. I merely mentioned Starwars because you happened to capitalize "Empire", which I felt was fairly amusing.

I happen to respect Europe fairly highly, especially France, since they stuck to their guns of protesting our little war in Iraq, since they'd be losing out on a lot of the contracts they had previously setup with Saddam. Poor France, losing all that money 🙁

Seriously though, I have no real problem with them. They're accusing us of pretty much the same thing they've been guilty of in the past. Both England and France (as well as Spain/Portugal and so on) had colonies and ran countries on the opposite side of the world, thus becoming an Empire. The biggest difference between us and them is that they didn't intend to stop running those countries, we don't really want to be running Iraq. Iraq has their own government, will be setting up their own judicial system, and will be taking care of their own matters as they come up, hopefully allowing us to leave and go stomp ass elsewhere in the general vicinity.

As far as the Iraqi people go, if they really saw us as an evil invading force, a lot more of them would be rising up to throw us out. Fact is that it's a small minority of people who are either too scared of their leaders or too stupid to think for themselves that want us out, and not so they can free Iraq, but so that they can take over and place the country back under a dictatorship, probably freeing Saddam from prison so he can go back to shooting random people at will.

So I don't really have much in the way of pity for certain European countries, which in the past have done one thing and now say another. Such is life, and it'll continue like that for the rest of time. There will always be people who don't agree, and there will always be people trying to rule over the weak, best we can hope to do is to spot them before they get too bad and snuff em out fast.
So I'm assuming you are throwing yours in with the Shi'ites and Kurds. The most unsecular, and 'unfree' of the bunch. You do know that in Sunni Iraq; women could divorce and keep custody of children, women didn't have to wear veils or burkahs, secularism was pushed forward, and religion in government was frowned upon? Did you ever think that the Sunni's could be fighting against the rise of a Shi'ite/Kurd theocracy in Iraq?

Naaaaah. They're all terrorists aren't they? A great way to group your enemy. I think I just heard Goebbels clap somewhere in the dim annals of hallowed antiquity.


I think you could be just as wrong as I was with the casualties/deaths mixup. Pre-gulfwar this might have been true but women in Iraq lost much of their gained freedoms afterwards.

For reference: http://www.hrw.org/backgrounder/wrd/iraq-women.htm
This coincided with a drop in Iraq's economic status from a second world to third world country during the same time period.
 
Originally posted by: rleemhui
infohawk, try and avoid the sweeping generalizations. This country is about 50/50 rebulican/democrat. I don't think that you can really say that one side has no backing behind what they do. He posted his opinion and didn't insult anyone. Either answer his questions or sit back and let others please. For the last few posts this has actually stayed civilized without too much in the way of insults being tossed at eachother. Lets not start that again

Thanks for the advice, noob.
 
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
then get off your elitest racist "political incorrectness" trip and wake up.
You are no better then the fascist you want to see gunned down so bad. your just hiding behind a flag.

Do you just like repeating yourself (or others in this case)? I have offered logical and observable phenomena with possible causes and solutions and you have addressed none of my responses.
 
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: rleemhui
infohawk, try and avoid the sweeping generalizations. This country is about 50/50 rebulican/democrat. I don't think that you can really say that one side has no backing behind what they do. He posted his opinion and didn't insult anyone. Either answer his questions or sit back and let others please. For the last few posts this has actually stayed civilized without too much in the way of insults being tossed at eachother. Lets not start that again

Thanks for the advice, noob.



We in here with a diffrent opinion are disrespected daily by the corprate mainstream mindset and our words and speech ignored and twisted.
People get upset and the feathers fly.
You could always crawl back under your bed where foxnews can tell you what is safe or not. Or you can put down the kool-aid and get with the picture.
It's up to you as an american -your choice.
(I am not saying yu should be silent though but don't expect the left to roll over and die like the tv would like you to believe the fight against the lies and disinformation has only begun.
 
So how am I republican based on fear?

- I am republican because I am pro-life which a mojority of republicans are
- I am republican because I believe in less government involvement in our daily lives
- I am republican because I approve of their across the board(percentage) based tax cuts to be more fair(no I don't make millions of dollars, I make minimum wage as of now)
- I am republican because I tend to agree with their way of handling situations more

Do I agree with everything they choose to do? No. There is always room for differences, but it just so happens that I tend to agree more with their methods. I see FEAR no where on that list. So I don't think you can honestly say thats the reason people are republicans.

If John Kerry was president and our troops were still in Iraq(As he admitted was the only choice) would you still be complaining?
 
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: rleemhui
infohawk, try and avoid the sweeping generalizations. This country is about 50/50 rebulican/democrat. I don't think that you can really say that one side has no backing behind what they do. He posted his opinion and didn't insult anyone. Either answer his questions or sit back and let others please. For the last few posts this has actually stayed civilized without too much in the way of insults being tossed at eachother. Lets not start that again

Thanks for the advice, noob.


And that just solves everything...I am a noob. Call someone a name and you must now be right with all your opinions. Leave the name calling aside and back up what you saw.
 
hell yeah clinton got no mercy from me either.
I would hold jk's feet to te fire even MORE then bush who I expect to be a greedy idiot already.
and your glossing over of issues does not say why you feel this way.

the noob thing is lame he CAN post in my thread infohawk he is being civil
and I don't think he is just trolling.
If he insults you personally then lay it on ok? call off the dogs please.
I would much rather have him in here then the standard "moonbats! oh teh nooes!" crowd who contribute nothing to debate.
 
Back
Top