Originally posted by: Brainonska511
You didn't even have to read the article.
In the headline: "Scientists believe lunar double whammy may reveal hidden ice in craters"
If we're going to send people back to the moon, it would be good to find out if there is any water on the surface. If you've got water on the moon, it could reduce costs significantly since you won't have to transport nearly as much water.
And as taxpayer, I'd rather see money dumped into the sciences. In the long run, it will be much more beneficial to us as a country (and a planet) than some BS war in Iraq or other nonsense that our government spends money on.
Originally posted by: CptCrunch
what, are they bored?
Originally posted by: Injury
Originally posted by: Brainonska511
You didn't even have to read the article.
In the headline: "Scientists believe lunar double whammy may reveal hidden ice in craters"
If we're going to send people back to the moon, it would be good to find out if there is any water on the surface. If you've got water on the moon, it could reduce costs significantly since you won't have to transport nearly as much water.
And as taxpayer, I'd rather see money dumped into the sciences. In the long run, it will be much more beneficial to us as a country (and a planet) than some BS war in Iraq or other nonsense that our government spends money on.
I'd rather see neither.
Screw space exploration. So what if we find water on the moon? What would that change?
Originally posted by: loup garou
pic of spacecraft in action
Originally posted by: jjones
It's about time we started striking out at the moon. It's been nothing but a drag on the Earth ever since it formed.
:facepalm;Originally posted by: KLin
Originally posted by: loup garou
pic of spacecraft in action
Looks like Pizza the Hut with a bullet casing in his eye. :laugh:
Originally posted by: LuckyTaxi
Originally posted by: Injury
Originally posted by: Brainonska511
You didn't even have to read the article.
In the headline: "Scientists believe lunar double whammy may reveal hidden ice in craters"
If we're going to send people back to the moon, it would be good to find out if there is any water on the surface. If you've got water on the moon, it could reduce costs significantly since you won't have to transport nearly as much water.
And as taxpayer, I'd rather see money dumped into the sciences. In the long run, it will be much more beneficial to us as a country (and a planet) than some BS war in Iraq or other nonsense that our government spends money on.
I'd rather see neither.
Screw space exploration. So what if we find water on the moon? What would that change?
Thank you very much. So what if the rings on Jupiter grow an extra 2 ft in diameter a year. Why?!
If we're going to colonize why not start building on something that's possible. Why the fvck send a craft to venus only to collect dust? We know it takes pretty long to get there and what human in their right mind would actually stand that? im sorry while i agree this is better than the iraq war, it's just a waste of money and time.
Originally posted by: loup garou
:facepalm;Originally posted by: KLin
Originally posted by: loup garou
pic of spacecraft in action
Looks like Pizza the Hut with a bullet casing in his eye. :laugh:
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Nuke the Moon!!!
Actually that looks cool as hell, gotta love NASA
Originally posted by: SirStev0
as opposed to crashing trillions of dollars worth of shit into Iraq?
Originally posted by: LuckyTaxi
why not spend all that money on colonizing the moon then?
"gee let me slam a muliti-million dollar vehicle into the moon"
"ooops, there's nothing there"
Let's do this 100 more times til we find water.
"Ok bob, we found water, now what?"
"Gee, i dont know, i was just hoping we'll find water. maybe we can colonize it now"
"oops nevermind bob, turns out there isn't much water left on here. onto Mercury!"
Without pure science, we probably wouldn't have TV's, among many other things.Originally posted by: BrownTown
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Am I the only one who wishes we (as a species) could spend more time on things like this and less fighting about pointless political issues? We have resources beyond imagining in any previous generation, we have reached the stage in our technological evolution where there is very little we can't do if we put our minds to it. The universe is a vast and wonderful place, and for the first time since our ancestors came out of their caves and gazed at the stars, we have the power to crack open the mysteries of the universe and peer inside. And yet for some reason we would rather focus on the minute differences between us to the point where we wage frequent and bloody wars over who prays to the right God.
On the flipside maybe we should be spending all that money to try to end wars instead of on useless science expiriments...
just playing a little Devils Advocate here, but as an engineer I don't always have the best of respect for "purse science". Sure everyone would love to have more things like this, but the question is how does finding a Higgs boson help ME...
Originally posted by: LuckyTaxi
Originally posted by: Injury
Originally posted by: Brainonska511
You didn't even have to read the article.
In the headline: "Scientists believe lunar double whammy may reveal hidden ice in craters"
If we're going to send people back to the moon, it would be good to find out if there is any water on the surface. If you've got water on the moon, it could reduce costs significantly since you won't have to transport nearly as much water.
And as taxpayer, I'd rather see money dumped into the sciences. In the long run, it will be much more beneficial to us as a country (and a planet) than some BS war in Iraq or other nonsense that our government spends money on.
I'd rather see neither.
Screw space exploration. So what if we find water on the moon? What would that change?
Thank you very much. So what if the rings on Jupiter grow an extra 2 ft in diameter a year. Why?!
If we're going to colonize why not start building on something that's possible. Why the fvck send a craft to venus only to collect dust? We know it takes pretty long to get there and what human in their right mind would actually stand that? im sorry while i agree this is better than the iraq war, it's just a waste of money and time.
Originally posted by: clamum
Not so retarded if we want to survive as a species. We best get off this planet and colonize other worlds.Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
space exploration is retarded.
Originally posted by: LuckyTaxi
Originally posted by: SirStev0
as opposed to crashing trillions of dollars worth of shit into Iraq?
wtf - this is not an iraq vs nasa thing. i agree the war sucks.
so short sighted. i take it you have no idea how much technology that affects your daily life was developed by NASA. here is a good place to start - http://www.thespaceplace.com/nasa/spinoffs.html .Originally posted by: LuckyTaxi
Originally posted by: Injury
Originally posted by: Brainonska511
You didn't even have to read the article.
In the headline: "Scientists believe lunar double whammy may reveal hidden ice in craters"
If we're going to send people back to the moon, it would be good to find out if there is any water on the surface. If you've got water on the moon, it could reduce costs significantly since you won't have to transport nearly as much water.
And as taxpayer, I'd rather see money dumped into the sciences. In the long run, it will be much more beneficial to us as a country (and a planet) than some BS war in Iraq or other nonsense that our government spends money on.
I'd rather see neither.
Screw space exploration. So what if we find water on the moon? What would that change?
Thank you very much. So what if the rings on Jupiter grow an extra 2 ft in diameter a year. Why?!
If we're going to colonize why not start building on something that's possible. Why the fvck send a craft to venus only to collect dust? We know it takes pretty long to get there and what human in their right mind would actually stand that? im sorry while i agree this is better than the iraq war, it's just a waste of money and time.
