Nasa to smash a spacecraft into the Moon

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Slew Foot

Lifer
Sep 22, 2005
12,379
96
86
Imaging the cool things we could do if we diverted half the military budget to NASA. Bases on the moon, manned trips to other planets. But instead, we get a a big hole in the desert.

 

Injury

Lifer
Jul 19, 2004
13,066
2
81
Originally posted by: Brainonska511
Originally posted by: LuckyTaxi
WHY?

Why? Are we as taxpayers paying for this?

You didn't even have to read the article.

In the headline: "Scientists believe lunar double whammy may reveal hidden ice in craters"

If we're going to send people back to the moon, it would be good to find out if there is any water on the surface. If you've got water on the moon, it could reduce costs significantly since you won't have to transport nearly as much water.

And as taxpayer, I'd rather see money dumped into the sciences. In the long run, it will be much more beneficial to us as a country (and a planet) than some BS war in Iraq or other nonsense that our government spends money on.

I'd rather see neither.

Screw space exploration. So what if we find water on the moon? What would that change?
 

jjones

Lifer
Oct 9, 2001
15,424
2
0
It's about time we started striking out at the moon. It's been nothing but a drag on the Earth ever since it formed.
 

oogabooga

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2003
7,806
3
81
Originally posted by: CptCrunch
what, are they bored?

yup, that is what the article (which has been quoted in this thread too) says. "NASA IS BORED AND WILL WASTE TAXPAYER MONEY BY SHOOTING SPACECRAFT INTO MOON: rumor says fireworks out of season large motivator for action"
 

LuckyTaxi

Diamond Member
Dec 24, 2000
6,044
23
81
Originally posted by: Injury
Originally posted by: Brainonska511
Originally posted by: LuckyTaxi
WHY?

Why? Are we as taxpayers paying for this?

You didn't even have to read the article.

In the headline: "Scientists believe lunar double whammy may reveal hidden ice in craters"

If we're going to send people back to the moon, it would be good to find out if there is any water on the surface. If you've got water on the moon, it could reduce costs significantly since you won't have to transport nearly as much water.

And as taxpayer, I'd rather see money dumped into the sciences. In the long run, it will be much more beneficial to us as a country (and a planet) than some BS war in Iraq or other nonsense that our government spends money on.

I'd rather see neither.

Screw space exploration. So what if we find water on the moon? What would that change?

Thank you very much. So what if the rings on Jupiter grow an extra 2 ft in diameter a year. Why?!

If we're going to colonize why not start building on something that's possible. Why the fvck send a craft to venus only to collect dust? We know it takes pretty long to get there and what human in their right mind would actually stand that? im sorry while i agree this is better than the iraq war, it's just a waste of money and time.

 

destrekor

Lifer
Nov 18, 2005
28,799
359
126
Originally posted by: LuckyTaxi
Originally posted by: Injury
Originally posted by: Brainonska511
Originally posted by: LuckyTaxi
WHY?

Why? Are we as taxpayers paying for this?

You didn't even have to read the article.

In the headline: "Scientists believe lunar double whammy may reveal hidden ice in craters"

If we're going to send people back to the moon, it would be good to find out if there is any water on the surface. If you've got water on the moon, it could reduce costs significantly since you won't have to transport nearly as much water.

And as taxpayer, I'd rather see money dumped into the sciences. In the long run, it will be much more beneficial to us as a country (and a planet) than some BS war in Iraq or other nonsense that our government spends money on.

I'd rather see neither.

Screw space exploration. So what if we find water on the moon? What would that change?

Thank you very much. So what if the rings on Jupiter grow an extra 2 ft in diameter a year. Why?!

If we're going to colonize why not start building on something that's possible. Why the fvck send a craft to venus only to collect dust? We know it takes pretty long to get there and what human in their right mind would actually stand that? im sorry while i agree this is better than the iraq war, it's just a waste of money and time.

you must not understand science at all. The whole point of a lot of these expeditions is to understand why everything is the way it is. And if we can understand the way the universe came about, we can focus our efforts much more on the most logical places of nearby space to look for other civilizations. The reason we have looked for life on Mars, is because we want evidence life has existed on places other than this puny rock of a planet. Why do we want to find other civilizations? Or even just find places where life is possible? So we can move there when this rock can no longer support us. We will very much likely become the very creatures we depict in sci-fi movies... creatures that move from one planet to the next, in search of hospitable conditions so we can live there... possibly terraform it, maybe rid it of creatures that pose a risk to our way of life, and live there until it too can no longer support us.

In all honesty... it's either this course of action we are taking now... explore the space around us to get a better understanding of the universe... or accept the fate of death in a distant time. Science is a slow process so we truly do need to do these things now if humanity is to survive.
The things we are doing now are mostly just side-projects, as we attempt to understand the properties of the universe so we can apply what we know to space travel... because any life, if none exists in our galaxy... is likely hundreds, thousands, or even millions of light years away, if not billions. So we need to devise a way to travel there efficiently and effectively. That's the other area that isn't discussed as much, even though more money is actually spent in that overall purpose than any other idea.
not to mention, the more we know about the universe, the better life will be here. Why? There are many things that can be learned from merely slamming atoms into each other, and that can be applied to a LOT of concepts. And once we learn more about dark matter and dark energy, we may be able to apply that knowledge. That knowledge alone may single-handedly solve any energy crisis we may run into.
Considering current knowledge details all elements as we know them as having been created in extremely massive stars.. well that's a revelation that blows away many other things. Thing of how we can apply that!

and as much as I could care less about the future of humanity (as of now we are but a major pain in the ass for nature)... many others actually do care. ;)
 

KLin

Lifer
Feb 29, 2000
30,483
780
126
Originally posted by: loup garou
Originally posted by: KLin
Originally posted by: loup garou
pic of spacecraft in action

Looks like Pizza the Hut with a bullet casing in his eye. :laugh:
:facepalm;

............................................________
....................................,.-??...................``~.,
.............................,.-?...................................?-.,
.........................,/...............................................?:,
.....................,?......................................................\,
.................../...........................................................,}
................./......................................................,:`^`..}
.............../...................................................,:?........./
..............?.....__.........................................:`.........../
............./__.(.....?~-,_..............................,:`........../
.........../(_....?~,_........?~,_....................,:`........_/
..........{.._$;_......?=,_.......?-,_.......,.-~-,},.~?;/....}
...........((.....*~_.......?=-._......?;,,./`..../?............../
...,,,___.\`~,......?~.,....................`.....}............../
............(....`=-,,.......`........................(......;_,,-?
............/.`~,......`-...............................\....../
.............\`~.*-,.....................................|,./.....\,__
,,_..........}.>-._\...................................|..............`=~-,
.....`=~-,_\_......`\,.................................
...................`=~-,,.\,...............................
................................`:,,...........................`\..............__
.....................................`=-,...................,%`>--==``
........................................_\..........._,-%.......`
...................................,<`.._|_,-&``................`\
 

rockyct

Diamond Member
Jun 23, 2001
6,656
32
91
If this $79 million mission detects water on the moon it will truly be one of the biggest bargains in NASA history. There are quite a few other NASA missions you could argue are a waste of taxpayer money. This is not one of them.
 

PottedMeat

Lifer
Apr 17, 2002
12,363
475
126
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Nuke the Moon!!!

Actually that looks cool as hell, gotta love NASA

I actually wouldn't mind seeing that either.

We have nukes. And there is the moon. We can reach the moon. It is our obligation to nuke the moon.

We should use nukes to tattoo 'USA! USA! USA!' or the US flag on the moon's surface.

 

LuckyTaxi

Diamond Member
Dec 24, 2000
6,044
23
81
why not spend all that money on colonizing the moon then?

"gee let me slam a muliti-million dollar vehicle into the moon"
"ooops, there's nothing there"

Let's do this 100 more times til we find water.

"Ok bob, we found water, now what?"
"Gee, i dont know, i was just hoping we'll find water. maybe we can colonize it now"
"oops nevermind bob, turns out there isn't much water left on here. onto Mercury!"
 

LuckyTaxi

Diamond Member
Dec 24, 2000
6,044
23
81
Originally posted by: SirStev0
as opposed to crashing trillions of dollars worth of shit into Iraq?

wtf - this is not an iraq vs nasa thing. i agree the war sucks.
 

Mr Pickles

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
4,103
1
0
Originally posted by: LuckyTaxi
why not spend all that money on colonizing the moon then?

"gee let me slam a muliti-million dollar vehicle into the moon"
"ooops, there's nothing there"

Let's do this 100 more times til we find water.

"Ok bob, we found water, now what?"
"Gee, i dont know, i was just hoping we'll find water. maybe we can colonize it now"
"oops nevermind bob, turns out there isn't much water left on here. onto Mercury!"

Its cool man. We can all be ignorant towards one thing. Thinking the people with the brightest minds on the planet are stupid just happens to be yours.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
They're not just randomly crashing something into the Moon for the hell of it. It's called "scientific research."

Drekstor already posted smething decent on the subject, but allow me to augment it with pastings from other similar threads complaining of the complete uselessness of pure scientific research.:)

Ok, found something, finally, from this thread:
(Search sucks without the sort-by-date feature, just like it did last time that feature was absent. :confused:)


Originally posted by: BrownTown
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Am I the only one who wishes we (as a species) could spend more time on things like this and less fighting about pointless political issues? We have resources beyond imagining in any previous generation, we have reached the stage in our technological evolution where there is very little we can't do if we put our minds to it. The universe is a vast and wonderful place, and for the first time since our ancestors came out of their caves and gazed at the stars, we have the power to crack open the mysteries of the universe and peer inside. And yet for some reason we would rather focus on the minute differences between us to the point where we wage frequent and bloody wars over who prays to the right God.

On the flipside maybe we should be spending all that money to try to end wars instead of on useless science expiriments...

just playing a little Devils Advocate here, but as an engineer I don't always have the best of respect for "purse science". Sure everyone would love to have more things like this, but the question is how does finding a Higgs boson help ME...
Without pure science, we probably wouldn't have TV's, among many other things.
"I want something to display images on boxes. To do this, you're going to need to discover the electron, then figure out how it interacts with magnetic fields. I think you should also discover that moving electrons can create magnetic fields. Then it's going to hit a screen of a substance that will glow. Get a chemist and discover phosphorus. Get to work on it right away!"
(This is a paraphrasing and augmentation of what Carl Sagan said here.)
When phosphorus was discovered, was it so that they could use it in TV's? When it was found that coils of wire could produce magnetic fields, was that for use in TV's? Was the discovery of the electron motivated by a desire to watch Seinfeld?
If you've ever watched TV, you owe it to this kind of pure science.
If you want to, just skip to 2:50 in that video.

MRI's, CAT scans, X-ray's- take your pick; radiology in general. Again, electromagnets - when that property of moving electrons was discovered, do you think they had in mind, "We can use this to see inside of people!" Or the same with X-rays. Or how about study of radioactive minerals? "A rock that emits invisible light that can kill people slowly. This kind of emission might be useful to save lives some day!" Now technetium is used in medicine, to help find cancer. Radiation being used to help find cancerous tumors, imagine that. Madame Curie probably never had such things in mind while she studied invisible radiation.

Pure science is critical to the advancement of our species. Many uses for natural phenomena are discovered by accident. Want fire? Striking two rocks together probably isn't the first thing that comes to mind to do this, but it can work.

Without pure science, our technology will stagnate. We'll lose the ability to find truly new things. Some of it is just to say, "I wonder what will happen," or, "I wonder why this happens." A natural thing is observed, and someone else decides, "Hey, that's nifty. I think I can use that for something!" Often times, it's completely unrelated to the original discovery. When electromagnets were first constructed, they probably never envisioned the ability to use them to move tons of metallic waste with the flip of a small lever, or their use in transportation in the form of maglev trains.
 

AnitaPeterson

Diamond Member
Apr 24, 2001
6,025
557
126
Originally posted by: LuckyTaxi
Originally posted by: Injury
Originally posted by: Brainonska511
Originally posted by: LuckyTaxi
WHY?

Why? Are we as taxpayers paying for this?

You didn't even have to read the article.

In the headline: "Scientists believe lunar double whammy may reveal hidden ice in craters"

If we're going to send people back to the moon, it would be good to find out if there is any water on the surface. If you've got water on the moon, it could reduce costs significantly since you won't have to transport nearly as much water.

And as taxpayer, I'd rather see money dumped into the sciences. In the long run, it will be much more beneficial to us as a country (and a planet) than some BS war in Iraq or other nonsense that our government spends money on.

I'd rather see neither.

Screw space exploration. So what if we find water on the moon? What would that change?

Thank you very much. So what if the rings on Jupiter grow an extra 2 ft in diameter a year. Why?!

If we're going to colonize why not start building on something that's possible. Why the fvck send a craft to venus only to collect dust? We know it takes pretty long to get there and what human in their right mind would actually stand that? im sorry while i agree this is better than the iraq war, it's just a waste of money and time.

Sadly, judging by the exchange between these last two, sending them to school was a waste of time.

Please don't breed! and step away from the computer, nobody needs any stinkin' science and knowledge!
 

SirStev0

Lifer
Nov 13, 2003
10,449
6
81
Originally posted by: LuckyTaxi
Originally posted by: SirStev0
as opposed to crashing trillions of dollars worth of shit into Iraq?

wtf - this is not an iraq vs nasa thing. i agree the war sucks.

you are complaining about a tax dollar waste... I personally believe that any space exploration, even of this sort, is much more of a worthwhile cause...
 

alien42

Lifer
Nov 28, 2004
12,869
3,299
136
Originally posted by: LuckyTaxi
Originally posted by: Injury
Originally posted by: Brainonska511
Originally posted by: LuckyTaxi
WHY?

Why? Are we as taxpayers paying for this?

You didn't even have to read the article.

In the headline: "Scientists believe lunar double whammy may reveal hidden ice in craters"

If we're going to send people back to the moon, it would be good to find out if there is any water on the surface. If you've got water on the moon, it could reduce costs significantly since you won't have to transport nearly as much water.

And as taxpayer, I'd rather see money dumped into the sciences. In the long run, it will be much more beneficial to us as a country (and a planet) than some BS war in Iraq or other nonsense that our government spends money on.

I'd rather see neither.

Screw space exploration. So what if we find water on the moon? What would that change?

Thank you very much. So what if the rings on Jupiter grow an extra 2 ft in diameter a year. Why?!

If we're going to colonize why not start building on something that's possible. Why the fvck send a craft to venus only to collect dust? We know it takes pretty long to get there and what human in their right mind would actually stand that? im sorry while i agree this is better than the iraq war, it's just a waste of money and time.
so short sighted. i take it you have no idea how much technology that affects your daily life was developed by NASA. here is a good place to start - http://www.thespaceplace.com/nasa/spinoffs.html .