• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Nasa to smash a spacecraft into the Moon

Originally posted by: LuckyTaxi
WHY?

Why? Are we as taxpayers paying for this?

Would you rather be funding an unwinable war in Iraq? 😕

The funding for this is likely a drop in the bucket compared to the debacle in Iraq.
 
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: LuckyTaxi
WHY?

Why? Are we as taxpayers paying for this?

Would you rather be funding an unwinable war in Iraq? 😕

The funding for this is likely a drop in the bucket compared to the debacle in Iraq.

and actually provide us with some uesfull information.
 
why not?
the hunt for water is important if we ever want to do anything in the future on the moon. if there is frozen water there... that's a huge discovery.
 
Originally posted by: LuckyTaxi
WHY?

Why? Are we as taxpayers paying for this?

You didn't even have to read the article.

In the headline: "Scientists believe lunar double whammy may reveal hidden ice in craters"

If we're going to send people back to the moon, it would be good to find out if there is any water on the surface. If you've got water on the moon, it could reduce costs significantly since you won't have to transport nearly as much water.

And as taxpayer, I'd rather see money dumped into the sciences. In the long run, it will be much more beneficial to us as a country (and a planet) than some BS war in Iraq or other nonsense that our government spends money on.
 
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: LuckyTaxi
WHY?

Why? Are we as taxpayers paying for this?

Would you rather be funding an unwinable war in Iraq? 😕

The funding for this is likely a drop in the bucket compared to the debacle in Iraq.

and actually provide us with some uesfull information.

I hear Al Qaeda has a hidden base on the lunar south pole.
 
Originally posted by: loup garou
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: LuckyTaxi
WHY?

Why? Are we as taxpayers paying for this?

Would you rather be funding an unwinable war in Iraq? 😕

The funding for this is likely a drop in the bucket compared to the debacle in Iraq.

and actually provide us with some uesfull information.

I hear Al Qaeda has a hidden base on the lunar south pole.

NUKE EM!


then we can have teh Ql Qaeda class of nuke 'm high!
 
Originally posted by: loup garou
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: LuckyTaxi
WHY?

Why? Are we as taxpayers paying for this?

Would you rather be funding an unwinable war in Iraq? 😕

The funding for this is likely a drop in the bucket compared to the debacle in Iraq.

and actually provide us with some uesfull information.

I hear Al Qaeda has a hidden base on the lunar south pole.

I also hear Al Qaeda is pouring money into researching fusion and alternative energy as well as new propulsion techniques.

$$$ for science here we come!

 
Originally posted by: LuckyTaxi
WHY?

Why? Are we as taxpayers paying for this?

Maybe if you READ the article you're linking to instead of just the headline, you'd know the answer to your own retarded question.
 
Originally posted by: PottedMeat
Originally posted by: loup garou
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: LuckyTaxi
WHY?

Why? Are we as taxpayers paying for this?

Would you rather be funding an unwinable war in Iraq? 😕

The funding for this is likely a drop in the bucket compared to the debacle in Iraq.

and actually provide us with some uesfull information.

I hear Al Qaeda has a hidden base on the lunar south pole.

I also hear Al Qaeda is pouring money into researching fusion and alternative energy as well as new propulsion techniques.

$$$ for science here we come!

That'd probably work too.
 
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: LuckyTaxi
WHY?

Why? Are we as taxpayers paying for this?

Would you rather be funding an unwinable war in Iraq? 😕

The funding for this is likely a drop in the bucket compared to the debacle in Iraq.

No doubt. NASA's entire yearly budget is only about 16 billion.
 
Back
Top