• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Nancy Pelosi Steps Down as Speaker

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Perknose said:
@imported_tajmahal Please answer this question in a completely straightforward manner or risk being infracted for trolling.

Perknose
Forum Director
Click to expand...
I am genuinely interested to see if he will answer that very simple question. I feel like he will take the infraction but I would be happy to be wrong.

Please do not comment on moderator actions in open forum. The sole legitimate venue for that is in Moderator Discussions.

Perknose
Forum Director
 
Last edited by a moderator:
imported_tajmahal said:
It's OK as long as Democrats do it, but evil when an opposing party does it. You dumbfuck.
Click to expand...
Why are you being dishonest? You know Pelosi had legitimate reasons, and a strong foundation, not to allow certain individuals to be on those committees. It wasn't for revenge or spite which is the ONLY reason McCarthy wants to ban democrats. So who's the Dumbfuck you dishonest prick?

You are welcome to list genuine and legitimate reasons why these democrats shouldn't be on committees, other than revenge or spite. If you can do that, and be honest about it, then maybe you have a leg to stand on.. but right now, you are just manipulating the truth (lying), slapping at the wind with your flailing arms, trying to make people believe your position/ argument, has any legitimacy to it.
 
Last edited:
NWRMidnight said:
Why are you being dishonest? You know Pelosi had legitimate reasons, and a strong foundation, not to allow certain individuals to be on those committees. It wasn't for revenge or spite which is the ONLY reason McCarthy wants to ban democrats. So who's the Dumbfuck you dishonest prick?

You are welcome to list genuine and legitimate reasons why these democrats shouldn't be on committees, other than revenge or spite. If you can do that, and be honest about it, then maybe you have a leg to stand on.. but right now, you are just manipulating the truth (lying), slapping at the wind with your flailing arms, trying to make people believe your position/ argument, has any legitimacy to it.
Click to expand...

we both know he doesn’t care about any of that. It’s alt-facts, feels, and FUD all the way down
 
fskimospy said:
Do you think anyone who resisted a democratic house subpoena should be jailed?
Click to expand...
To my recollection no one that resisted a House subpoena was ever jailed.....such as Eric Holder and others. Until the Pelosi House where many were threatened with Jail and at least one was jailed. No one resisting an obviously partisan subpoena should be jailed for it.
 
NWRMidnight said:
Why are you being dishonest? You know Pelosi had legitimate reasons, and a strong foundation, not to allow certain individuals to be on those committees. It wasn't for revenge or spite which is the ONLY reason McCarthy wants to ban democrats. So who's the Dumbfuck you dishonest prick?

You are welcome to list genuine and legitimate reasons why these democrats shouldn't be on committees, other than revenge or spite. If you can do that, and be honest about it, then maybe you have a leg to stand on.. but right now, you are just manipulating the truth (lying), slapping at the wind with your flailing arms, trying to make people believe your position/ argument, has any legitimacy to it.
Click to expand...
Bull fucking shit. Legitimate reasons my ass. Strong foundations ? Bull fucking shit. It was spite and petty revenge and partisan politics. Kicking Republicans off the committees and replacing them with hand chosen Democratic pawns? It had never happened before in the History of the House and i for one am looking forward to payback. 7 Democrats and 2 hand picked Republican lickspittles. Yeah that's fair.
 
imported_tajmahal said:
To my recollection no one that resisted a House subpoena was ever jailed.....such as Eric Holder and others. Until the Pelosi House where many were threatened with Jail and at least one was jailed. No one resisting an obviously partisan subpoena should be jailed for it.
Click to expand...

I’m guessing you and other traitors get to be the arbitrator of what is considered partisan, right?
 
imported_tajmahal said:
To my recollection no one that resisted a House subpoena was ever jailed.....such as Eric Holder and others. Until the Pelosi House where many were threatened with Jail and at least one was jailed. No one resisting an obviously partisan subpoena should be jailed for it.
Click to expand...
Thank you for proving my point, haha.
 
thehill.com

58 percent say Jan. 6 House committee is biased: poll

A majority of voters say they believe the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol is biased, according to a new Harvard CAPS-Harris Poll survey. Fifty-eight perce…
thehill.com thehill.com


"A majority of voters say they believe the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol is biased, according to a new Harvard CAPS-Harris Poll survey.


Fifty-eight percent of voters polled said they believed the committee set up by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) was biased, while 42 percent said they thought it was fair. "


Only highly partisan Democrats think such an obvious power play by Pelosi and the Democrats is fair.
 
imported_tajmahal said:
Bull fucking shit. Legitimate reasons my ass. Strong foundations ? Bull fucking shit. It was spite and petty revenge and partisan politics. Kicking Republicans off the committees and replacing them with hand chosen Democratic pawns? It had never happened before in the History of the House and i for one am looking forward to payback. 7 Democrats and 2 hand picked Republican lickspittles. Yeah that's fair.
Click to expand...

Speaking of bull fucking shit! Educate yourself you fucking piece of shit traitor!


I’ll highlight the relevant part since we know you lack reading comprehension:

Hope for comity wasn’t dead yet early in the year, and a bipartisan agreement was hammered out in May by the leaders of the House Homeland Security Committee to create an independent commission that was modeled on the panel that investigated the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

But it was rejected by most House Republicans and subsequently blocked by Senate Republicans.
House Democrats then decided to create a special investigative committee, and the House passed a resolution establishing one on a 220-to-190 vote on June 30, with two Republicans joining Democrats in voting in favor of the panel.
The Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol was born.
It is made up of seven Democrats and the two Republicans who voted to establish the committee, Reps. Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Adam Kinzinger of Illinois. They joined at the request of Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) after House GOP leaders decided not to participate in the inquiry because Pelosi rejected two of their proposed members.
Click to expand...

Now maybe in your world it makes sense to have people on a committee who might have participated in the very thing you are investigating but in a sane world that shit doesn’t fly.
 
"House Democrats then decided to create a special investigative committee, and the House passed a resolution establishing one on a 220-to-190 vote on June 30, with two Republicans joining Democrats in voting in favor of the panel. "

Gosh, the 2 Republicans that are no longer in the House? Yep, sounds fair /S.
 
imported_tajmahal said:
"House Democrats then decided to create a special investigative committee, and the House passed a resolution establishing one on a 220-to-190 vote on June 30, with two Republicans joining Democrats in voting in favor of the panel. "

Gosh, the 2 Republicans that are no longer in the House? Yep, sounds fair /S.
Click to expand...
Why would that not be fair?
 
imported_tajmahal said:
"House Democrats then decided to create a special investigative committee, and the House passed a resolution establishing one on a 220-to-190 vote on June 30, with two Republicans joining Democrats in voting in favor of the panel. "

Gosh, the 2 Republicans that are no longer in the House? Yep, sounds fair /S.
Click to expand...


Glad to see you're back from work release. How long will you be out of jail this time?
 
Indus said:
Hey little itty bitty proud boy Trump koolaid drinker,

We didn't try to overthrow the country because we didn't like the result of an election.

You did.

Sincerely,
The not traitorous American.
Click to expand...
It is kind of funny how the Republican Party attempted a coup and when the coup failed decided that it was terribly unfair that anyone would investigate it.
 
Indus said:
Hey little itty bitty proud boy Trump koolaid drinker,

We didn't try to overthrow the country because we didn't like the result of an election.

You did.

Sincerely,
The not traitorous American.
Click to expand...
I was at home in Texas when the rioters pulled their bullshit in D.C. I didn't support it and i thought it was stupid.
 
fskimospy said:
It’s established beyond any doubt that the last Republican president attempted to overturn the results of the election he lost through extralegal means.

What would you refer to that as?
Click to expand...
No it hasn't. You probably believe in the whole Russia! Russia! Russia! bullshit too don't you?
 
Imagine trying to have a reasonable conversation with someone who supports murdering illegal immigrants with grenades and rifles.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top