• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Nancy Pelosi Steps Down as Speaker

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
imported_tajmahal said:
Partisan attacks and in neither was he found guilty. Try, try to understand, i know it's tough for you, but give it a kindergarten attempt. An impeachment is only an accusation and in this country (United States of America) a person is innocent until proven guilty and he was not convicted.
Click to expand...
I always appreciate your Facebook uncle contributions here.
 
imported_tajmahal said:
Partisan attacks and in neither was he found guilty. Try, try to understand, i know it's tough for you, but give it a kindergarten attempt. An impeachment is only an accusation and in this country (United States of America) a person is innocent until proven guilty and he was not convicted.
Click to expand...
Re read The Constitution of The United States, Pay attention to it's words.
 
HomerJS said:
Dude, come on Civics 101. He was impeached twice
Click to expand...

Ok, ok, shoot me.
You know I was saying CONVICTED. Found guilty. Tossed out on his ass.
None of which, happened.
Ok, lets say ACCUSED instead of impeached. Because to impeach is to accuse, but the conviction.... awww that's the ticket. That was the missing piece of the puzzle. And... Nancy should have never impeached unless she was 100% sure she had a conviction. Especially with being knows as the master vote counter. Otherwise, it was all a waste of time.
And... AND.... one of the main reason that the Jan 6th committee was written off as just another political witch hunt. Nancy failing to convict opened the door for discrediting the real deal, the Jan 6th investigation.
But, we love her. We do.
 
imported_tajmahal said:
Partisan attacks and in neither was he found guilty. Try, try to understand, i know it's tough for you, but give it a kindergarten attempt. An impeachment is only an accusation and in this country (United States of America) a person is innocent until proven guilty and he was not convicted.
Click to expand...
Yet another little brat kid who skipped school when Civics 101 was being taught
 
sportage said:
Ok, ok, shoot me.
You know I was saying CONVICTED. Found guilty. Tossed out on his ass.
None of which, happened.
Click to expand...
Yeah well Nancy never said that would happen. Own up, you misspoke. 🙄
sportage said:
Ok, ok, shoot me.
You know I was saying CONVICTED. Found guilty. Tossed out on his ass.
None of which, happened.
Ok, lets say ACCUSED instead of impeached. Because to impeach is to accuse, but the conviction.... awww that's the ticket. That was the missing piece of the puzzle. And... Nancy should have never impeached unless she was 100% sure she had a conviction. Especially with being knows as the master vote counter. Otherwise, it was all a waste of time.
And... AND.... one of the main reason that the Jan 6th committee was written off as just another political witch hunt. Nancy failing to convict opened the door for discrediting the real deal, the Jan 6th investigation.
But, we love her. We do.
Click to expand...
Dude, you're trolling here, pure and simple. Get a grip.
 
dainthomas said:
No one else could have gotten as much done with such a microscopic majority. We'll see the opposite end of the spectrum with Mcarthy (however long he lasts).
Click to expand...
They couldn't get much done when they had a bigger majority when Trump was President.. In fact, they had the trifecta and still didn't get much done other than a tax break for the rich...
 
imported_tajmahal said:
Partisan attacks and in neither was he found guilty. Try, try to understand, i know it's tough for you, but give it a kindergarten attempt. An impeachment is only an accusation and in this country (United States of America) a person is innocent until proven guilty and he was not convicted.
Click to expand...
Are you fucking stupid? That is a rhetorical question, because we all know you are dumb as a brick.. go back and retake high school civics.. learn the constitution.. (hint, the constriction states in black and white that Trump was impeached, and it sure as hell wasn't an accusation). Then, when you are done, learn the difference between criminal law and political processes.
 
sportage said:
Ok, ok, shoot me.
You know I was saying CONVICTED. Found guilty. Tossed out on his ass.
None of which, happened.
Ok, lets say ACCUSED instead of impeached. Because to impeach is to accuse, but the conviction.... awww that's the ticket. That was the missing piece of the puzzle. And... Nancy should have never impeached unless she was 100% sure she had a conviction. Especially with being knows as the master vote counter. Otherwise, it was all a waste of time.
And... AND.... one of the main reason that the Jan 6th committee was written off as just another political witch hunt. Nancy failing to convict opened the door for discrediting the real deal, the Jan 6th investigation.
But, we love her. We do.
Click to expand...
You need to buddy up with the other dumbass who failed CIVICS.. you both need to sit right up close to the teach (maybe ask for extra credit). and stop confusing criminal law with the political process of impeachment. Even if the Senate Agreed that Trump was guilty, that doesn't mean he is removed.. that is ANOTHER process. Being found not guilty, doesn't mean he wasn't impeached per the constitution. Of course being found not guilty by the Republican majority Senate, is a loose term (not guilty) as many republican's agreed that the house proved that he was, yet still voted no.. (do you notice I said voted, as that is all it was... a vote in a political process full of political bias, not a criminal hearing that has any legal standing judicially).

I find it oddly interesting, yet sickening, that you blame Nancy for the Republican's lack of integrity, honestly, and morals.. I never saw you as a person who played the blame game.. a dishonesty blame game at that.
 
Last edited:
NWRMidnight said:
You need to buddy up with the other dumbass who failed CIVICS.. you both need to sit right up close to the teach (maybe ask for extra credit). and stop confusing criminal law with the political process of impeachment. Even if the Senate Agreed that Trump was guilty, that doesn't mean he is removed.. that is ANOTHER process. Being found not guilty, doesn't mean he wasn't impeached per the constitution. Of course being found not guilty by the Republican majority Senate, is a loose term (not guilty) as many republican's agreed that the house proved that he was, yet still voted no.. (do you notice I said voted, as that is all it was... a vote in a political process full of political bias, not a criminal hearing that has any legal standing judicially).

I find it oddly interesting, yet sickening, that you blame Nancy for the Republican's lack of integrity, honestly, and morals.. I never saw you as a person who played the blame game.. a dishonesty blame game at that.
Click to expand...
Dude goes off the rails periodically, you just gotta go SMH.
 
imported_tajmahal said:
McCarthy will now be 3rd in line to the Presidency behind Uncle Joe and Camela.
Click to expand...
hm.. does mccarthy think he has a chance to be pres before 2024?

thus why he's got such a hard on for that position that's he's on his knees sucking and swallowing whoever is in front of him to get the votes?
 
Side note I didn't see mentioned here: almost every single Republican skipped Pelosi's resignation speech, including Kevin McCarthy.

Classy folks, them Republicans.

And a light-touch preview of the scorched-earth hell they will be bringing to the floor of the House.
 
imported_tajmahal said:
nypost.com

Rep. Kevin McCarthy vows to boot Omar, Schiff and Swalwell from key committees as speaker

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said the bans would apply to Reps. Ilhan Omar, Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell if he is elevated to speaker.
nypost.com nypost.com

Right out of the Pelosi playbook. It's going to be interesting when we see a Biden family House investigation with the same rules that Pelosi imposed for the Jan. 6 House committee.
Click to expand...
Presumably you agree Biden should follow the Trump example in cooperating with congressional investigations then too, right? Also it’s going to be hilarious to watch conservatives suddenly decide congressional subpoenas must be complied with.
 
I sort of feel the same way about people crowing about McCarthy as speaker as I did as Republicans crowing about their red wave in the days before the election. Counting unhatched chickens is rarely wise.

He might end up with it but the non-MAGA types in the party who don't want a clown show are going to have something to say about what happens. Also the Dems could meddle in the speaker election.

For as much hate as Pelosi gets the Republicans absolutely go to bed every night wishing they had a House leader that was as effective and powerful.
 
imported_tajmahal said:
nypost.com

Rep. Kevin McCarthy vows to boot Omar, Schiff and Swalwell from key committees as speaker

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said the bans would apply to Reps. Ilhan Omar, Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell if he is elevated to speaker.
nypost.com nypost.com

Right out of the Pelosi playbook. It's going to be interesting when we see a Biden family House investigation with the same rules that Pelosi imposed for the Jan. 6 House committee.
Click to expand...

embrace nutters like McCarthy and MTG, good job!
 
fskimospy said:
Presumably you agree Biden should follow the Trump example in cooperating with congressional investigations then too, right? Also it’s going to be hilarious to watch conservatives suddenly decide congressional subpoenas must be complied with.
Click to expand...

I think you’re overestimating their memory. Think goldfish
 
fskimospy said:
It's not that they don't remember, it's that they never cared to begin with. They will no doubt invent a reason why the Democratic subpoenas to Trump were bad and rightfully ignored but the Republican subpoenas to Biden are good and should be followed.
Click to expand...

sure, they already have it. Everything that comes at trump is a liberal witch hunt. Brain dump after 24 hours
 
Last edited:
imported_tajmahal said:
nypost.com

Rep. Kevin McCarthy vows to boot Omar, Schiff and Swalwell from key committees as speaker

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said the bans would apply to Reps. Ilhan Omar, Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell if he is elevated to speaker.
nypost.com nypost.com

Right out of the Pelosi playbook. It's going to be interesting when we see a Biden family House investigation with the same rules that Pelosi imposed for the Jan. 6 House committee.
Click to expand...
Huh? Oblivious to why Pelosi made such choices I see. Or, rather, unwilling to admit the obvious. But feel free to keep showing us all how ignorant and brain washed you are in your next response where you try to connect the "dots".
 
NWRMidnight said:
Huh? Oblivious to why Pelosi made such choices I see. Or, rather, unwilling to admit the obvious. But feel free to keep showing us all how ignorant and brain washed you are in your next response where you try to connect the "dots".
Click to expand...
It's OK as long as Democrats do it, but evil when an opposing party does it. You dumbfuck.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top