Originally posted by: Zebo
I see no difference between a book like this and cinderella. Both love stories. What's the problem?
Originally posted by: LordMagnusKain
one promotes unethical sexual behavior, the other is gay. seriously: kids don't need left-wing crap about the 'alternative sexuality's' at this age; You should respect that, even though you don't like it, their are others who should have the right not to have their children indoctrinated by the state: left or right.Originally posted by: Zebo I see no difference between a book like this and cinderella. Both love stories. What's the problem?
Originally posted by: LordMagnusKain
Originally posted by: Zebo
I see no difference between a book like this and cinderella. Both love stories. What's the problem?
one promotes unethical sexual behavior, the other is gay.
seriously: kids don't need left-wing crap about the 'alternative sexuality's' at this age; You should respect that, even though you don't like it, their are others who should have the right not to have their children indoctrinated by the state: left or right.
Originally posted by: BDawg
1. Reading about gays doesn't turn you gay. Touching a gay doesn't turn you into one
2. Not everyone in NC is as ignorant and backwoods as these people
3. Librarys cater to the openness of ideas, not bonfires
Originally posted by: conjur
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1582461139/qid=1079629684/sr=1-9/ref=sr_1_9/103-6831320-5514234?v=glance&s=books
Join newlyweds King Lee and King Bertie on their journey into the noisy jungle. The kings are greeted by wild animal families, but the royal travelers suspect that something more significant awaits them in the trees. King & King soon discover that there?s no adventure more wonderful than starting a family of their own.
Wow...the right-wing bigots are in an uproar up here!
Originally posted by: tec699
Originally posted by: BugsBunny1078
We have to defend our children from these perverts. Alot of responsible parents have pulled their kids out of public schools and homeschool them.
This allows them to raise their kids free from the gay agenda being forced on their kids. Unfortunately some parents can't afford to do this. That doesn;t mean we have to sit back and accept whatever those homos try to force on our kids.Give them an inch they take a mile. Well theyve gone too far. No more gay rights no more nothing. We have to oppose even homosexuality's very existence to keep this away from our kids. A few smart people in Tennessee realise this.
Your a POS. jacka**.
Anyway people don't pull their children out of the public school systems because of the homosexuals, as it mostly has to do with religious beliefs. Also, what gay agenda are you talking about? So your telling me that public schools are forcing children to believe in that their is only one lifestyle and that's the homosexual lifestyle?
Anyway I'll restate I what I said. Your an ignorant POS idiot who should be banned from these forums. The homosexuals that I know are educated and very very successful. Something your probably not.
Also, thank god I don't live down in Tennessee and I can't wait until the Supreme Court kills the bill.
Originally posted by: Pepsei
Originally posted by: conjur
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1582461139/qid=1079629684/sr=1-9/ref=sr_1_9/103-6831320-5514234?v=glance&s=books
Join newlyweds King Lee and King Bertie on their journey into the noisy jungle. The kings are greeted by wild animal families, but the royal travelers suspect that something more significant awaits them in the trees. King & King soon discover that there?s no adventure more wonderful than starting a family of their own.
Wow...the right-wing bigots are in an uproar up here!
I disagree, even I (left winger) don't think the book should be there, and the comment by the principal is dumb.
"We have a lot of diversity in our schools," said Elizabeth Miars, Freeman's principal. "What might be inappropriate for one family, in another family is a totally acceptable thing."
So does that mean we can have gay bashing books too? because what might be inappropriate for one family, in another family is a totally acceptable thing.
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: Pepsei
Originally posted by: conjur
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1582461139/qid=1079629684/sr=1-9/ref=sr_1_9/103-6831320-5514234?v=glance&s=books
Join newlyweds King Lee and King Bertie on their journey into the noisy jungle. The kings are greeted by wild animal families, but the royal travelers suspect that something more significant awaits them in the trees. King & King soon discover that there?s no adventure more wonderful than starting a family of their own.
Wow...the right-wing bigots are in an uproar up here!
I disagree, even I (left winger) don't think the book should be there, and the comment by the principal is dumb.
"We have a lot of diversity in our schools," said Elizabeth Miars, Freeman's principal. "What might be inappropriate for one family, in another family is a totally acceptable thing."
So does that mean we can have gay bashing books too? because what might be inappropriate for one family, in another family is a totally acceptable thing.
Yep hate abounds but it has no place rearing young minds like love does.
Originally posted by: alchemize
"Mommy, last week you explained making babies to me"
"Yes son"
"So how do gay people make babies?"
"Well son, when a man loves another man very much...they meet at a bathhouse..."
Oh boy..that could be a fun one![]()
Originally posted by: Romans828
Originally posted by: BDawg
1. Reading about gays doesn't turn you gay. Touching a gay doesn't turn you into one
2. Not everyone in NC is as ignorant and backwoods as these people
3. Librarys cater to the openness of ideas, not bonfires
Reading books about sodomy does not turn you into a sodomite, but my kids have no business reading that either
Just beacause people are bothered by this type of book at this age does not make them ignorant nor backwards
librarys often cater to radical left wing agendas and radical objectives, this book CLEARLY carries an agenda.
Originally posted by: BDawg
Originally posted by: Romans828
Originally posted by: BDawg
1. Reading about gays doesn't turn you gay. Touching a gay doesn't turn you into one
2. Not everyone in NC is as ignorant and backwoods as these people
3. Librarys cater to the openness of ideas, not bonfires
Reading books about sodomy does not turn you into a sodomite, but my kids have no business reading that either
Just beacause people are bothered by this type of book at this age does not make them ignorant nor backwards
librarys often cater to radical left wing agendas and radical objectives, this book CLEARLY carries an agenda.
Homosexuality and sodomy are not equatable...
Originally posted by: Romans828
Originally posted by: BDawg
1. Reading about gays doesn't turn you gay. Touching a gay doesn't turn you into one
2. Not everyone in NC is as ignorant and backwoods as these people
3. Librarys cater to the openness of ideas, not bonfires
Reading books about sodomy does not turn you into a sodomite, but my kids have no business reading that either
Just beacause people are bothered by this type of book at this age does not make them ignorant nor backwards
librarys often cater to radical left wing agendas and radical objectives, this book CLEARLY carries an agenda.
