Mythbusters: Diving into water saves you from bullets...

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

trevinom

Golden Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,061
0
0
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
So the opening scene in Saving Private Ryan, where some of the soldiers are getting shot underwater, isn't quite accurate?

I don't see why this wouldn't be accurate. The slugs have travelled some distance so have lost some of their velocity, they should be able to penetrate farther and with their larger caliber(mass), do more damage.

 

SophalotJack

Banned
Jan 6, 2006
1,252
0
0
Think of the incredible applications this NEW research on bullets has for our army!

Who needs kevlar? Just give our soldiers water balloons that they can tie to themselves. If they ever get thirsty... they can just drink their armour.
 

Arkitech

Diamond Member
Apr 13, 2000
8,356
4
76
cool

the next time I'm running from drug dealers, gun smugglers or the CIA (this happens more often than you think) I'm diving into the nearest body of water


 

davestar

Golden Member
Oct 21, 2001
1,787
0
0
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
Originally posted by: QurazyQuisp
It's ruined every movie with guns shooting into the water since. (for me)

if you shoot straight down it's no problem (as their shotty showed), but at an angle, bullets go bye bye

nope, it's the velocity of the bullet
 

Mermaidman

Diamond Member
Sep 4, 2003
7,987
93
91
Originally posted by: trevinom
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
So the opening scene in Saving Private Ryan, where some of the soldiers are getting shot underwater, isn't quite accurate?

I don't see why this wouldn't be accurate. The slugs have travelled some distance so have lost some of their velocity, they should be able to penetrate farther and with their larger caliber(mass), do more damage.
I'm sure the sheer number of bullets meant that some caused injuries.
 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0

ed21x

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 2001
5,411
8
81
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Yeah, it's kind of like how people assume it doesn't hurt to plunge into a pool of water from 100+ feet. It's sort of like hitting a concrete wall
Maybe if you do a belly flop.

If you break the surface tension of the water with your arms or feet first, it shouldn't be so bad.

i believe people hit terminal velocity at 150 ft or less anyways, so we can technically survive any fall into the water...
 

BigB10293

Senior member
Mar 23, 2005
358
0
0
Originally posted by: ed21x
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Yeah, it's kind of like how people assume it doesn't hurt to plunge into a pool of water from 100+ feet. It's sort of like hitting a concrete wall
Maybe if you do a belly flop.

If you break the surface tension of the water with your arms or feet first, it shouldn't be so bad.

i believe people hit terminal velocity at 150 ft or less anyways, so we can technically survive any fall into the water...

Tell that to people that jump off bridges.
 

mordantmonkey

Diamond Member
Dec 23, 2004
3,075
5
0
Originally posted by: ed21x
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Yeah, it's kind of like how people assume it doesn't hurt to plunge into a pool of water from 100+ feet. It's sort of like hitting a concrete wall
Maybe if you do a belly flop.

If you break the surface tension of the water with your arms or feet first, it shouldn't be so bad.

i believe people hit terminal velocity at 150 ft or less anyways, so we can technically survive any fall into the water...

not even close. terminal velocity is around 120mph~175fps
so it'd take about 3.5secs to reach terminal? maybe 300feet? i'm just estimating...

 

baoytl

Senior member
Aug 14, 2000
330
0
76
Originally posted by: dquan97
nobody taped it?

Was the show called Bullet Proof Water? If so, there is a torrent at digitaldistractions. I guess it came out last year.