The stakes are too great for him not to issue one, or for her to not accept one.
you seem concerned.The stakes are too great for him not to issue one, or for her to not accept one.
The stakes are too great for him not to issue one, or for her to not accept one.
My prediction is he won't because there's no crime. If Trump did try to go after Clinton it would probably destroy his administration.
It's an interesting concept, he can issue a blanket pardon, it's been done before.
If she were to accept a pardon, it is considered, legally an admission of guilt. She could just say, "Yes, I screwed up with the email server" and in fact, she already has. It would just be a formal recognition of the mess, and put everything behind her.
Her risk is pretty significant, if Trump's admin has some issues, and we all know there will be issues, a dog and pony show with a special prosecutor going after Hillary will burn up countless news cycles and divert attention.
In order for someone to be pardoned they need to have committed a crime.
No need to pardon her.
Even if they did, the GOP would just continue to do its quarterly "Investigation" to keep the base happy.
They would probably launch an "investigation" into Obama's pardon
you seem even more concerned now.It's an interesting concept, he can issue a blanket pardon, it's been done before.
If she were to accept a pardon, it is considered, legally an admission of guilt. She could just say, "Yes, I screwed up with the email server" and in fact, she already has. It would just be a formal recognition of the mess, and put everything behind her.
Her risk is pretty significant, if Trump's admin has some issues, and we all know there will be issues, a dog and pony show with a special prosecutor going after Hillary will burn up countless news cycles and divert attention.
Don't they also have to be convicted of a crime in order to receive a pardon?
I'm not saying she's guilty of a crime.
Well then there's nothing to pardon. I sincerely doubt she would accept a pardon even if it was offered as that would be tantamount to acknowledging guilt.
She has little to fear from Trump. If he did try to force the DOJ to prosecute his political enemies he would run into such a buzzsaw of opposition from every corner that he would either run away VERY quickly or watch it destroy his administration. I imagine Clinton would in some ways welcome that as it would be some pretty sweet revenge.
2000 messages in less than 5 months. You are averaging 14 posts a day.
Unfortunately, the people who really shouldn't be are often the most vocal. Every post you make is dumber than the last.
"The stakes are too great for him not to issue one, or for her to not accept one."
"I'm not saying she's guilty of a crime."
Funny how Trump supporters blame the DNC for Trump being elected. No, its people like you who post nonsense with no factual basis, but any kind of sensational headline that be can latched on to and you are rounding the wagons to circle jerk. Can you show one of the last 100 posts you made where you actually added something that could be discussed that anyone in this reality can respond to? Or is it all 911 conspiracy theories and garbage posts?
you seem concerned.
you seem even more concerned now.
If there is any notion of pardons it'd be based on corruption and bribery at the State Department, as revealed by Podesta's emails.
The classified information, if handled like Petraeus, would be the least of her criminality.
