i'm just trying to understand your position where is is bad for a society to destroy the possessions of the dead and ok for society to destroy the possessions of the dead at the same time. I don't see how it can be both good and bad at the same time.Originally posted by: blackangst1
It's your shit. Do with it what you want....Originally posted by: miketheidiot
so if i want to burn all my shit to the ground when i die, society should not let that happen?Originally posted by: blackangst1
Yes.Originally posted by: LumbergTech
philosphically speaking, do you think that there would be something wrong with a society that voluntarily destroyed its monetary wealth upon death?Originally posted by: blackangst1
Government deciding how much or how little wealth/money one should have is...WRONG.
what corner are trying to back me into?