Of course I'm exaggerating, but by how much? It's a given that processing through the government is going to cost you a good chunk of overhead.Originally posted by: JMapleton
First of all, you're exaggerating so say there would be nothing left. Secondly if there isn't, that's the citizen's fault for electing bad politicians so they will pay their own price for their mistakes.Originally posted by: paperfist
So why would any 'ole smoe be entitled to your inheritance but not your children? And you want the government to distribute the checks? So after all the red tape, embezzlement, etc there won't be anything left to hand out.
While I may believe there shouldn't be any poor, suffering, homeless, uneducated in the U.S. due to its wealth I don't agree your fortune should not be handed down to your children if you so choose.
Ahh have you voted recently? Last time I voted a few month ago (just like every time I vote) I got to pick between the lesser of two evils for each and every office. We wouldn't even need a plan like yours if 90% of government would stop wasting tax payer money.