Originally posted by: shady06
science majors should add an extra .5 GPA when comparing themselves to non-science major. my friend is an aerospace engineering major and his GPA is 3.2 as where I (a poli sci major) have a 3.7 GPA but he is smarter
Originally posted by: Orsorum
Originally posted by: shady06
science majors should add an extra .5 GPA when comparing themselves to non-science major. my friend is an aerospace engineering major and his GPA is 3.2 as where I (a poli sci major) have a 3.7 GPA but he is smarter
Am I allowed to make the adjustment if I'm an econ+math major? 'Cuz I would love to have a 3.75 equiv. GPA.![]()
Originally posted by: CoolTech
Who says you should be able to make this .5 gpa addition? Usually people who go into scientific fields have been adept at logical based courses their whole lives. So, why should someone who has always been good at writing or business be discounted just because they dont excel at math/science. Crock of b.s. if you ask me. Fact is, business majors run these scientific companies and in the end usually make more over time than any little engineer drawing out schematics in his/her cubicle. Just my 2 cents.
Originally posted by: glen
I thought you were heading to Med School?Originally posted by: notfred
2.265. Blah. I suck at trying hard in classes that don't interest me. At least I already have a job.
People with 3.5+ GPAs (in science and engineering majors) How many hours/week do you spend studying?
BTW, if you're in high school, I don't care about your GPA at all, don't bother posting it.
I got in with about that GPA, but college was ten years ago for me, so the school gave me a break.
Originally posted by: RichieZ
Originally posted by: FallenHero
B, A, A, A, B, A, A, A, A ,A, A
U,U,D,D,L,R,L,R,B,A,SEL,START
Originally posted by: KahunaHube
gpa is largely affected by which school you go to. The reason being you are with other students with about hte same brainpower as you.
you can go to a second rate university and get a 3.8 while doing the same amoutn of work will get you a 3.0 in a first rate university.
it depends what school you go to and what the average intelligence is of htat school
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: CoolTech
Who says you should be able to make this .5 gpa addition? Usually people who go into scientific fields have been adept at logical based courses their whole lives. So, why should someone who has always been good at writing or business be discounted just because they dont excel at math/science. Crock of b.s. if you ask me. Fact is, business majors run these scientific companies and in the end usually make more over time than any little engineer drawing out schematics in his/her cubicle. Just my 2 cents.
it was just a joke, my point was IMO, science majors have it way harder than other majors
Originally posted by: ed21x
It's weird how so many business majors here at Cal have some sort of notion of magically becoming a CEO right when they graduate, when truth is, the average opening salary for an engineer is actually higher. Combine this with the fact that most major companies are founded by people with the necessary skills to succeed in their respective fields (ie, the company that I work at, Point of View, was founded by a group of programmers comming together in Irvine) and you tell me once again when a business major has actually been able to succeed in a specialized field.
I have to admit though, a good number of business majors I know are doing quite well in accounting and consulting.![]()
Originally posted by: Hector13
you wanna see something real funny? Apply for their jobs and see them bitch when you get interviews (and offers) over them.
I graduated from cal with an engineering degree and when into finance (wall st.), so when I was applying to jobs I was going up against haas majors.
The only crummy part is what someone above mentioned about GPAs. While I don't think you can generalize about people's intelligence based on their major, I do remember that engineering GPAs and business GPAs (at least at Cal) were scaled completely differently. So if a company gets an assload of applicants for a job, their first screen is probably based on school and GPA, so a lot of engineers will get screened eventhough their 3.2 GPA may be equivalent to a 3.5 from Haas.
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
Originally posted by: glen
I thought you were heading to Med School?Originally posted by: notfred
2.265. Blah. I suck at trying hard in classes that don't interest me. At least I already have a job.
People with 3.5+ GPAs (in science and engineering majors) How many hours/week do you spend studying?
BTW, if you're in high school, I don't care about your GPA at all, don't bother posting it.
I got in with about that GPA, but college was ten years ago for me, so the school gave me a break.
You got into Med school with about a 2.3 GPA?!
lim(GPA -> 0) College of Engineering = College of Business
Originally posted by: coldcut
Join a frat?
Originally posted by: MindStorm
lim(GPA -> 0) College of Engineering = College of Business
LOL, that is great.
My GPA in Engineering: 2.9. Whenever I see non-engineering majors brag about their GPAs, it makes me want to throw my physics book at them. My modern language major roommate is like that. He was bragging about his 3.7 GPA and about making the Dean's List. I gave him problem #5 from Chapter 2 from my physics textbook to solve because he was being too arrogant. Other than logic, you only needed to know speed = distance / time, which is obvious. Mr. Dean's List didn't have the brain power to solve the problem, and he even took physics in high school (and blamed his teacher for his inadequacies in the class). What's even funnier is that as an engineer, I placed into a higher English course than the modern language dude (Advanced English 112 vs Honors English 101).