my friend just suffocated a mouse POLL

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: HamburgerBoy
Originally posted by: ajf3
A guy I shared an apt with for awhile in college had a 4 ft. python... tossed little white mice in the aquarium all the time for it to eat - he bought them at the pet store - called them 'feeder' mice I think. Got to be like they were just a cage of moving snake food.

Those types of mice are meant to be fed to snakes.

:disgust: what? just because its white? Is it's DNA altered so it doenst feel pain? Are the breed to know that they are snake food only and cant wait to be thrown in a cage with a hungry python?? i dont get your logic?

yes fvck the snake! we should kill them all since they eat other animals! from now on i am feeding my snake only green veggies!
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: HamburgerBoy
Originally posted by: ajf3
A guy I shared an apt with for awhile in college had a 4 ft. python... tossed little white mice in the aquarium all the time for it to eat - he bought them at the pet store - called them 'feeder' mice I think. Got to be like they were just a cage of moving snake food.

Those types of mice are meant to be fed to snakes.

:disgust: what? just because its white? Is it's DNA altered so it doenst feel pain? Are the breed to know that they are snake food only and cant wait to be thrown in a cage with a hungry python?? i dont get your logic?

yes fvck the snake! we should kill them all since they eat other animals! from now on i am feeding my snake only green veggies!
vegansnake ftw!

 

meltdown75

Lifer
Nov 17, 2004
37,548
7
81
didn't read the madness which some people would call a thread...

if your friend is over the age of 8, he needs to FOAD.
 

Patt

Diamond Member
Jan 30, 2000
5,288
2
81
He is definitely a sicko ... killing a mouse is one thing, but making it suffer ... a whole other thing. This jerkoff probably played too much of the Strangulation Game ... :|
 
Jun 18, 2000
11,208
774
126
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: KnightBreed
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: KnightBreed
Originally posted by: moshquerade
justifiying a sicko = another sicko
I think we're done here.:roll:
so why did you continue it? :confused:
Because you were trolling?
i know you are, but what am i?
yeh, you just took it to that point of stupidity. :roll:
I took it the point of stupidity? You called me a sicko for calling you on your bullsh*t argument.
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: KnightBreed
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: KnightBreed
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: KnightBreed
Originally posted by: moshquerade
justifiying a sicko = another sicko
I think we're done here.:roll:
so why did you continue it? :confused:
Because you were trolling?
i know you are, but what am i?
yeh, you just took it to that point of stupidity. :roll:
I took it the point of stupidity? You called me a sicko for calling you on your bullsh*t argument.
look around and see who agrees with me and who agrees with you.

you lose. now go out with some dignity if possible.

 
Jun 18, 2000
11,208
774
126
Originally posted by: moshquerade
look around and see who agrees with me and who agrees with you.

you lose. now go out with some dignity if possible.
Did I in any way justify what this person did?

"Everybody agrees with me, therefore I'm right" is not a real argument. Every one of your posts just makes you seem that much more clueless.
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: KnightBreed
Originally posted by: moshquerade
look around and see who agrees with me and who agrees with you.

you lose. now go out with some dignity if possible.
Did I in any way justify what this person did?

"Everybody agrees with me, therefore I'm right" is not a real argument. Every one of your posts just makes you seem that much more clueless.
you aren't worth my time anymore.

continue on digging your hole... without me.

 

UDT89

Diamond Member
Jul 31, 2001
4,529
0
76
tell ur friend to come over my house........i wanna show him my golf swing.

 

yowolabi

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2001
4,183
2
81
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: KnightBreed
Originally posted by: moshquerade
and you have proof to the contrary?

maybe Dahmer's parents didn't think anything of his animal abuse either.

read the signs: http://ezinearticles.com/?Animal-Cruelty:--The-Key-to-Serial-Minds&id=35856
Why would I need proof to the contrary? The other posters in this thread have done all of my research for me. From your link:
* Cruelty to Animals: Most children can be cruel to animals, such as pulling the legs off of spiders, but future serial killers often kill larger animals, like dogs and cats, and frequently for their solitary enjoyment rather than to impress peers.
They provide zero statistics that indicate what percentage of animal torturers become serial killers. They only state that serial killers have "often" tortured animals before moving onto humans.

Did all serial killers torture animals? No.
Does everybody that's ever tortured an animal become a serial killer? No.
All squares are a rectangle, but are all rectangles a square? No!
justifiying a sicko = another sicko


He just pointed out logically why arguments that this kid is related to serial killers are stupid. And then instead of making a logical argument, you made an ad hominem attack, presumably because you didn't have a logical comeback.

Saying there's not a real relationship between cruelty to animals and killing human beings does not equal saying that the torturer's actions were acceptable.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: yowolabi
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: KnightBreed
Originally posted by: moshquerade
and you have proof to the contrary?

maybe Dahmer's parents didn't think anything of his animal abuse either.

read the signs: http://ezinearticles.com/?Animal-Cruelty:--The-Key-to-Serial-Minds&id=35856
Why would I need proof to the contrary? The other posters in this thread have done all of my research for me. From your link:
* Cruelty to Animals: Most children can be cruel to animals, such as pulling the legs off of spiders, but future serial killers often kill larger animals, like dogs and cats, and frequently for their solitary enjoyment rather than to impress peers.
They provide zero statistics that indicate what percentage of animal torturers become serial killers. They only state that serial killers have "often" tortured animals before moving onto humans.

Did all serial killers torture animals? No.
Does everybody that's ever tortured an animal become a serial killer? No.
All squares are a rectangle, but are all rectangles a square? No!
justifiying a sicko = another sicko


He just pointed out logically why arguments that this kid is related to serial killers are stupid. And then instead of making a logical argument, you made an ad hominem attack, presumably because you didn't have a logical comeback.

Saying there's not a real relationship between cruelty to animals and killing human beings does not equal saying that the torturer's actions were acceptable.


shhhh! she is on a roll! no need to point out the truth.

 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: yowolabi
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: KnightBreed
Originally posted by: moshquerade
and you have proof to the contrary?

maybe Dahmer's parents didn't think anything of his animal abuse either.

read the signs: http://ezinearticles.com/?Animal-Cruelty:--The-Key-to-Serial-Minds&id=35856
Why would I need proof to the contrary? The other posters in this thread have done all of my research for me. From your link:
* Cruelty to Animals: Most children can be cruel to animals, such as pulling the legs off of spiders, but future serial killers often kill larger animals, like dogs and cats, and frequently for their solitary enjoyment rather than to impress peers.
They provide zero statistics that indicate what percentage of animal torturers become serial killers. They only state that serial killers have "often" tortured animals before moving onto humans.

Did all serial killers torture animals? No.
Does everybody that's ever tortured an animal become a serial killer? No.
All squares are a rectangle, but are all rectangles a square? No!
justifiying a sicko = another sicko


He just pointed out logically why arguments that this kid is related to serial killers are stupid. And then instead of making a logical argument, you made an ad hominem attack, presumably because you didn't have a logical comeback.

Saying there's not a real relationship between cruelty to animals and killing human beings does not equal saying that the torturer's actions were acceptable.


shhhh! she is on a roll! no need to point out the truth.
nah, i am not going to get into it with him. it would just be repeating logic.

 

Bassyhead

Diamond Member
Nov 19, 2001
4,545
0
0
What state does your friend live in? In many states, like NY, animal cruelty is punishable by jail and fine, no matter what kind of animal it is. Example:

A person who overdrives, overloads, tortures or cruelly beats or unjustifiably injures, maims, mutilates or kills any animal, whether wild or tame, and whether belonging to himself or to another, or deprives any animal of necessary sustenance, food or drink, or neglects or refuses to furnish it such sustenance or drink, or causes, procures or permits any animal to be overdriven, overloaded, tortured, cruelly beaten, or unjustifiably injured, maimed, mutilated or killed, or to be deprived of necessary food or drink, or who wilfully sets on foot, instigates, engages in, or in any way furthers any act of cruelty to any animal, or any act tending to produce such cruelty, is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment for not more than one year, or by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars, or by both.

Edit: Statutes for other states: http://www.animal-law.org/statutes/
 
Jun 18, 2000
11,208
774
126
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: KnightBreed
Originally posted by: moshquerade
look around and see who agrees with me and who agrees with you.

you lose. now go out with some dignity if possible.
Did I in any way justify what this person did?

"Everybody agrees with me, therefore I'm right" is not a real argument. Every one of your posts just makes you seem that much more clueless.
you aren't worth my time anymore.

continue on digging your hole... without me.
Turn tail and run.:roll:
 
Jun 18, 2000
11,208
774
126
Originally posted by: waggy
Originally posted by: yowolabi
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: KnightBreed
Originally posted by: moshquerade
and you have proof to the contrary?

maybe Dahmer's parents didn't think anything of his animal abuse either.

read the signs: http://ezinearticles.com/?Animal-Cruelty:--The-Key-to-Serial-Minds&id=35856
Why would I need proof to the contrary? The other posters in this thread have done all of my research for me. From your link:
* Cruelty to Animals: Most children can be cruel to animals, such as pulling the legs off of spiders, but future serial killers often kill larger animals, like dogs and cats, and frequently for their solitary enjoyment rather than to impress peers.
They provide zero statistics that indicate what percentage of animal torturers become serial killers. They only state that serial killers have "often" tortured animals before moving onto humans.

Did all serial killers torture animals? No.
Does everybody that's ever tortured an animal become a serial killer? No.
All squares are a rectangle, but are all rectangles a square? No!
justifiying a sicko = another sicko
He just pointed out logically why arguments that this kid is related to serial killers are stupid. And then instead of making a logical argument, you made an ad hominem attack, presumably because you didn't have a logical comeback.

Saying there's not a real relationship between cruelty to animals and killing human beings does not equal saying that the torturer's actions were acceptable.


shhhh! she is on a roll! no need to point out the truth.
:D I'll take it in stride. I just assumed she was baiting me.
 

Leper Messiah

Banned
Dec 13, 2004
7,973
8
0
Originally posted by: KnightBreed
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: KnightBreed
Originally posted by: moshquerade
look around and see who agrees with me and who agrees with you.

you lose. now go out with some dignity if possible.
Did I in any way justify what this person did?

"Everybody agrees with me, therefore I'm right" is not a real argument. Every one of your posts just makes you seem that much more clueless.
you aren't worth my time anymore.

continue on digging your hole... without me.
Turn tail and run.:roll:



What are you an idiot? Do you not recongize the fact this is a socially deviant activity and is not to be encouraged?
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: Leper Messiah
Originally posted by: KnightBreed
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: KnightBreed
Originally posted by: moshquerade
look around and see who agrees with me and who agrees with you.

you lose. now go out with some dignity if possible.
Did I in any way justify what this person did?

"Everybody agrees with me, therefore I'm right" is not a real argument. Every one of your posts just makes you seem that much more clueless.
you aren't worth my time anymore.

continue on digging your hole... without me.
Turn tail and run.:roll:



What are you an idiot? Do you not recongize the fact this is a socially deviant activity and is not to be encouraged?


he is not engouraging it. he is providing proof that killing a mouse is not going to lead to the guy being a mass murderer.
 
Jun 18, 2000
11,208
774
126
Originally posted by: Leper Messiah
What are you an idiot? Do you not recongize the fact this is a socially deviant activity and is not to be encouraged?
Be careful, if that knee jerks any harder, you'll kick yourself in the face.:roll:

Listen, I was not under any circumstances condoning what he did. Torturing animals, as appaling as it is, does not mean he's going to murder a bunch of people.
 

Gooberlx2

Lifer
May 4, 2001
15,381
6
91
Animal cruelty is often a predictor of being a sociopath, and pre-cursor to more violent crimes.

"Just a small rodent" or not, being enthralled by the writhing and suffering of any higher order animal (really, I'm not going to include bugs here) is not something normal and balanced people do.

In any case, yes, your friend is a sick f#*k. I hope karma bites him in the a$$.