Capt Caveman
Lifer
- Jan 30, 2005
- 34,543
- 651
- 126
Originally posted by: GrantMeThePower
Here's my question:
What and which health insurance is the best for pets? It feels like a scam when i read the pamphlets...
I use VPI Pet Insurance.
Originally posted by: GrantMeThePower
Here's my question:
What and which health insurance is the best for pets? It feels like a scam when i read the pamphlets...
Originally posted by: Chryso
So how much would you spend to keep a pet in perfect health? $100k?
Would you take out a loan for a million dollars? My guess is you would not, and if that is true then you also have a dollar amount that you are putting on your pet. I just happen to be aware of mine up front.
man: "Would you sleep with someone for $1 mil?"
woman: "I suppose."
man: "How about $100?"
woman: "What kind of woman do you think I am?"
man: "Ma'am, weve already determined that, now we're just arguing price..."
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: Chryso
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: Chryso
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: Chryso
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: Chryso
Our rule is anything that costs more than $500 isn't going to happen for a pet.
50 years from now it will be your kids saying:
"Our rule is anything that costs more than $500 isn't going to happen for Dad"
I have my own money. Any money my pets have they are welcome to use.
BTW, I think this may have a bit to do with how much money you have/make.
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say you probably shouldn't have pets...or kids....and probably even plants.
So because I won't spend my life savings to squeeze a few more months out of an aging dog then I am a bad person? I think perhaps you are just a wee bit insane.
If your life savings equals $1600-$1800 you've got bigger issues to deal with.
Anyway....
When you get a pet you take on the responsibility of caring for that pet. That includes not just food, water and shelter, but anything else they might need. A pet is a member of your family. Would you turn out one of your parents because they are old and spending X number of dollars would only "squeeze a few more months" out of them?
If you have no intention of being FULLY responsible for a pet then you really have no business with one.
So how much would you spend to keep a pet in perfect health? $100k?
Would you take out a loan for a million dollars? My guess is you would not, and if that is true then you also have a dollar amount that you are putting on your pet. I just happen to be aware of mine up front.
Whatever it takes.
Wouldn't need to take out a loan.
Whatever it takes to keep them healthy is what I would spend. Period.
Originally posted by: MrPickins
Oh, as for pets, I own 2 cats, and love them dearly. But, anything over $500 and they have to go. Their lifespans are too short to be cost effective in trying to keep them around.
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: MrPickins
Oh, as for pets, I own 2 cats, and love them dearly. But, anything over $500 and they have to go. Their lifespans are too short to be cost effective in trying to keep them around.
A cat can live for over 20 years. $500/20 years = $25 year
Love must not mean a lot to you.
Originally posted by: shinerburke
If your life savings equals $1600-$1800 you've got bigger issues to deal with.
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: MrPickins
Oh, as for pets, I own 2 cats, and love them dearly. But, anything over $500 and they have to go. Their lifespans are too short to be cost effective in trying to keep them around.
A cat can live for over 20 years. $500/20 years = $25 year
Love must not mean a lot to you.
Originally posted by: MrPickins
Originally posted by: shinerburke
If your life savings equals $1600-$1800 you've got bigger issues to deal with.
While true, using this in an argument makes you look like an asshole.
Originally posted by: OdiN
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: Chryso
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: Chryso
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: Chryso
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: Chryso
Our rule is anything that costs more than $500 isn't going to happen for a pet.
50 years from now it will be your kids saying:
"Our rule is anything that costs more than $500 isn't going to happen for Dad"
I have my own money. Any money my pets have they are welcome to use.
BTW, I think this may have a bit to do with how much money you have/make.
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say you probably shouldn't have pets...or kids....and probably even plants.
So because I won't spend my life savings to squeeze a few more months out of an aging dog then I am a bad person? I think perhaps you are just a wee bit insane.
If your life savings equals $1600-$1800 you've got bigger issues to deal with.
Anyway....
When you get a pet you take on the responsibility of caring for that pet. That includes not just food, water and shelter, but anything else they might need. A pet is a member of your family. Would you turn out one of your parents because they are old and spending X number of dollars would only "squeeze a few more months" out of them?
If you have no intention of being FULLY responsible for a pet then you really have no business with one.
So how much would you spend to keep a pet in perfect health? $100k?
Would you take out a loan for a million dollars? My guess is you would not, and if that is true then you also have a dollar amount that you are putting on your pet. I just happen to be aware of mine up front.
Whatever it takes.
Wouldn't need to take out a loan.
Whatever it takes to keep them healthy is what I would spend. Period.
I've gotta find a vet in your area and get him to send you a bill for $1 Billion.
Depends if I did well at tax time or not.Originally posted by: slayer202
Originally posted by: Chryso
Our rule is anything that costs more than $500 isn't going to happen for a pet.
What's your limit for a child or wife? mother or father?
Originally posted by: Chryso
Our rule is anything that costs more than $500 isn't going to happen for a pet.
Originally posted by: ShakesMcgee
I highly suggest pet insurance if you plan on paying for procedures like these. Our same dog had an emergency spleenectimy a few months before his ACL. All in all we paid over $3500 for both surgeries since we did not have insurance. When you are faced with the decision of paying for surgery to save your pet's life you make it makes the decision much harder. In reality when I had to make these decisions money was not a factor. One downfall with pet insurance is that they don't cover ACL related issues for 1 year after the start of the policy.
If you have any questions let me know and I would be glad to help.
Originally posted by: silverpig
Originally posted by: Chryso
Our rule is anything that costs more than $500 isn't going to happen for a pet.
It's more like, as soon as the cost of euthanasia + adoption fee + shots + neutering/spaying for a new dog becomes less than the cost of surgery...
Originally posted by: thecoolnessrune
Originally posted by: Chryso
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: Chryso
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: Chryso
Our rule is anything that costs more than $500 isn't going to happen for a pet.
50 years from now it will be your kids saying:
"Our rule is anything that costs more than $500 isn't going to happen for Dad"
I have my own money. Any money my pets have they are welcome to use.
BTW, I think this may have a bit to do with how much money you have/make.
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say you probably shouldn't have pets...or kids....and probably even plants.
So because I won't spend my life savings to squeeze a few more months out of an aging dog then I am a bad person? I think perhaps you are just a wee bit insane.
Precisely. This will be debated till dieing days, but for me human /= animal. $500 is a reasonable amount to spend on a close pet. It would have to be a big, friendly, reliable dog for me that I've had for a long time. I won't pay crap for a cat. If my wife wants one I'll let her fund it.
:thumbsup::laugh:Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: MrPickins
Originally posted by: shinerburke
If your life savings equals $1600-$1800 you've got bigger issues to deal with.
While true, using this in an argument makes you look like an asshole.
Look like an asshole? Where have you been? I AM an asshole.
Originally posted by: Linflas
Originally posted by: Chryso
Our rule is anything that costs more than $500 isn't going to happen for a pet.
Our rule is that we take on the responsibility we will spend whatever is necessary on our pet to keep it healthy and cared for.
Originally posted by: Perknose
It's not about how much money you have, it's about how much heart . . . and personal integrity.
People who would turn their backs on their pets lives because of cost would probably cut corners in any number of other situations.
I wouldn't piss on such deadbeat losers if they were on fire.
