system #1: E6300@3.43ghz S3 mobo F6 bios 1.46v actual a) 3.5ghz w/ 1.5v actual
system #2: E6400@3.43ghz DS3 mobo F7 bios 1.46v actual a) 3.5ghz w/ 1.5v actual
b) 3.53ghz 1.53v actual
system #3: E6600@3.26ghz DS3 mobo F7 bios 1.45v actual a) 3.33ghz 1.48v actual
All system running 2 instances of prime95 for at least 1 hour before temp was used
#1------------56c
#1 a)---------62c
#2------------49c
#2 a)---------55c
#2 b)---------58c
#3------------57c
#3 a)---------62c
All systems running 2 instances of F@H for at least 1 hour before temp was used...most actually running for weeks
#1-----------49c
#1 a)--------54c
#2-----------41c
#2 a)--------46c
#2 b)--------49c
#3-----------48c
#3 a)--------53c
Now I understand the E6600 cause of the added cache but I can't imagine since they all use same setups, same HSFs, same cooling I did such a poorer job on the E6300
Perhaps I will need to reseat the E6300 and see if I can get the temps lower....I will also check rub marks to see if IHS may be more concave then the other
system #2: E6400@3.43ghz DS3 mobo F7 bios 1.46v actual a) 3.5ghz w/ 1.5v actual
b) 3.53ghz 1.53v actual
system #3: E6600@3.26ghz DS3 mobo F7 bios 1.45v actual a) 3.33ghz 1.48v actual
All system running 2 instances of prime95 for at least 1 hour before temp was used
#1------------56c
#1 a)---------62c
#2------------49c
#2 a)---------55c
#2 b)---------58c
#3------------57c
#3 a)---------62c
All systems running 2 instances of F@H for at least 1 hour before temp was used...most actually running for weeks
#1-----------49c
#1 a)--------54c
#2-----------41c
#2 a)--------46c
#2 b)--------49c
#3-----------48c
#3 a)--------53c
Now I understand the E6600 cause of the added cache but I can't imagine since they all use same setups, same HSFs, same cooling I did such a poorer job on the E6300
Perhaps I will need to reseat the E6300 and see if I can get the temps lower....I will also check rub marks to see if IHS may be more concave then the other
