Mubarak: Arabs Hate U.S. More Than Ever

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Easy way to tell is if Mel Gibson will ever get another job by Jewish controlled hollywood again dispite his enourmous success.
 

chess9

Elite member
Apr 15, 2000
7,748
0
0
Megaworks:

That's a film that NEEDS to be made. Are you kidding me? Speilberg may be the most liberal Jew in America, since you seem to be counting. :)

As an aging jock I can tell you I was horrified that the Olympics of all places should be the venue for such hatred. If it had been the Jamaican bobsled team I would have felt the same way. Might actually have made a better movie, too.

Anyway, does that proposed film demonstrate Spielberg's pro-Israel agenda, his canny business acumen for making a few extra hundred million, his imaginative genius, or....what?

Sheezh, I almost believe I'm bothering with this drivel.... I may fart.... :)

Come on, man, from your prior posts I wouldn't expect this from you.

-Robert
 

MegaWorks

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2004
3,819
1
0
Originally posted by: chess9
Megaworks:



That's a film that NEEDS to be made. Are you kidding me? Speilberg may be the most liberal Jew in America, since you seem to be counting. :)



As an aging jock I can tell you I was horrified that the Olympics of all places should be the venue for such hatred. If it had been the Jamaican bobsled team I would have felt the same way. Might actually have made a better movie, too.



Anyway, does that proposed film demonstrate Spielberg's pro-Israel agenda, his canny business acumen for making a few extra hundred million, his imaginative genius, or....what?



Sheezh, I almost believe I'm bothering with this drivel.... I may fart.... :)



Come on, man, from your prior posts I wouldn't expect this from you.



-Robert

cmon bro, of course he's trying to give a pro-israeli statment here. Palestinians killing Israeli, if he's so liberal would he make a movie showing Israeli atrocities agains the palestinians I don't think so
 

etech

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
10,597
0
0
Originally posted by: LilBlinbBlahIce
Originally posted by: etech

Originally posted by: LilBlinbBlahIce

Originally posted by: etech



Originally posted by: Infohawk



Let me help you guys: George Bush is more responsible for anti-US sentiment than George Washington or the Tooth Fairy.











Actually I'm a little pissed at the Arabs. They let their societies get to where they ferment fundemtilists that blow up embassies, ships and ram planes into buildings full of innocent people. They let a dictator kill and live of other Arabs and turn a blind eye to his atrocities.







Then they get upset when the bad guys they ignored are finally dealt with. I consider them quite hypocritical.







Actually I'm a little pissed off at the US for supporting regimes like Mubarak and the House of Saud that treat their citizens like scum, while at the same time pretending to "promote democracy". I'm pissed off at the US for not supporting the democratic movement in Iran. I'm pissed off at the US for giving Saddam the WMD he used to kill thousands and then invading Iraq to "disarm" him. I'm pissed off at the US for its support for the Mujahiddin and then leaving them once we no longer need them to end up creating the Taliban. When I say I'm pissed off at the US I mean I am pissed of the successive administrations that have screwed things up and I'm pissed off at us Americans for not demanding change. That said, Bush has done a lot more to screw up things than others in recent memory have, this last Israeli ass kissing being a prime example.





Well at least you didn't turn terrorist and decide to kill innocent people.



Are you also pissed at France and Germany for providing many more weapons, chemicals and a nuclear reactor to Iraq? Are you pissed at them for refusing to accept that Saddam needed to be removed or do you think that he and his sons should have been left in power for generations to come?



Would you have been pissed if the US stayed in Afghanistan and tried nation building instead of leaving Afghanistan to the Afghanis. If not, why your ire about Iraq?



As for Israel, I just don't have the energy tonight to get into that one.



No I didn't turn to terrorism for the simple fact that as much as I disagree with the aformentioned policies, they have not direclty affected my life. I have not lost my home, had my family killed or my country destroyed as a result of the actions of a foreign nation. If I had, who knows, I hope I never have to find out. Yes, I i would be pissed off at France and Germany for giving them more weapons if in fact they did, but if that was the case, where are said weapons? Am I pissed off at them for saying Saddam did not need to be removed? I don't think anyone ever said that, just that invasion was not the right course of action, to which I agree. There are monsters far worse that Saddam and his sons lurking out there, so if altruism is what this is all about, we should have gone after them first. But we know what this war was all about so lets not get into that. As for Afghanistan, no, I don't think we should have stayed ther because we were never "there" to begin with (I'm talking about '89), however I do think we should have taken steps to make sure the country stabalized itself and did not fall into anarchy like it did. We got what we needed, we left them there to rot. And for Israel, whats the point of getting into it? They have us on a leash, been that way since the country was created, will remain that way long after I die. And all it will do is generate more hatred towards us without providing us with ANY benefit. The absurdity of our support for that country is amazing. I'm an American first, so I care about my countries well being first, supporting Isreal is the most pointless thing we've ever done.




I have not lost my home, had my family killed or my country destroyed as a result of the actions of a foreign nation.

What country?

Yes, I i would be pissed off at France and Germany for giving them more weapons if in fact they did,

They did and much much more than the US ever did. Where are they, that is the $64 question isn't it.

Am I pissed off at them for saying Saddam did not need to be removed? I don't think anyone ever said that, just that invasion was not the right course of action, to which I agree.

Are you saying that Saddam did or did not need to be removed? Please factor in all of the social and economic factors of the middle east into your answer. Factor in what his form of government was doing and what sort of example it was setting for other nations. Factor in his support for Palestinian terrorists. Factor in his son who was being groomed to take over from papa Saddam and what his rule would have been like.

There are monsters far worse that Saddam and his sons lurking out there,

Who? bin Laden? possibly, but he is also being dealt with. So who is your next choice?

But we know what this war was all about so lets not get into that.

Of course you know what it was all about, some other conspriacy nuts probably agree with you.

As for Afghanistan, no, I don't think we should have stayed ther because we were never "there" to begin with (I'm talking about '89), however I do think we should have taken steps to make sure the country stabalized itself and did not fall into anarchy like it did.

We shouldn't stay there but we should "nation build" it into a stable country when we were never there to begin with. I just can't handle your logic .

We got what we needed, we left them there to rot.

What in your mind did we get? I thought we helped them when the Soviets invaded their country and then politely got the hell out of their country. Your answer is still without logic.


As for Israel, if you support another holocaust than we should never have supported Israel at all for that is what would have happened if the US had not supported them.
 

chess9

Elite member
Apr 15, 2000
7,748
0
0
Megaworks:

Give him some time, but don't hold your breath. :) If you can figure out how that would translate into a good movie, then YOU write the script. :) The Munich murders is a real life drama just begging for a movie, IMHO. When I saw the blurb my first reaction was: "YES!".

But, on a more somber note, I agree that the Palestinian's side of that story needs a dramatic vehicle.

-Robert
 

MegaWorks

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2004
3,819
1
0
Originally posted by: chess9
Megaworks:



Give him some time, but don't hold your breath. :) If you can figure out how that would translate into a good movie, then YOU write the script. :) The Munich murders is a real life drama just begging for a movie, IMHO. When I saw the blurb my first reaction was: "YES!".



But, on a more somber note, I agree that the Palestinian's side of that story needs a dramatic vehicle.



-Robert

well said! but if anyone tries to make a movie about the oppression of the Palestinians people they will call it "anti-semitic" and "a propaganda againts Israel"
 

Michael

Elite member
Nov 19, 1999
5,435
234
106
MegaWorks - If they told the full story - oppression by their fellow Arabs as they use them as a pawn coupled with a simmering war against Israel, then it might be worth watching.

I have a fair amount of sympathy for their cause (up to and including the knowledge that they're denied voting rights <couples in with the right to return>), but I have no sympathy for their continual decisions to turn to terrorism after they have had multiple opportunities to settle peacefully.

Michael
 

oLLie

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2001
5,203
1
0
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: ThePresence
He blamed the hostility partly on U.S. support for Israel, which assassinated Hamas leader Abdel-Aziz al-Rantissi in a missile strike in the Gaza Strip (news - web sites) Saturday weeks after killing his predecessor, Sheikh Ahmed Yassin.
I see, Mubarak. If Israel kills the people who are killing Israel's people, that causes hate. Israel must sit back and let it's citizens be slaughtered. Aha, I get it now.

And Israel illegally occupying Palestinian terrritory (Gaza Strip) means they should be free from reprisals?

Nice justification of terrorism, there. I'm surprised the Palestinian response to the "wrongs" that have been done to them by Israel has won them the sympathy of anyone besides the typical, college liberal. I hope I haven't mistakenly excluded you from that group.
 

BugsBunny1078

Banned
Jan 11, 2004
910
0
0
Originally posted by: MegaWorks
Originally posted by: BugsBunny1078

Bill O'Reilly - "All terrorists are Muslims"



Bugs shut up or I will send this to the moderator
Excuse me but I was just quoting the oft quoted Mr Bill O'Reilly on something which he had just said on television the instant before I posted that. If you don't like it then blame him, for he is the one who said it.


 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
Originally posted by: MegaWorks
another prove Spielberg new movie

guys please they have a big influence, second I didn't mean the jews. Some jews are againts the creation of Israel I'm pointing at the pro-Israelis, the Zionists in the State and the lobby of course.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/OneDayinSeptember-1102530/

95% fresh, One Day in September (2000)


its an interesting documentary, can be found on netflix. not to say its proof of a jewish lobby. there are plenty of films on middle eastern suffering, most recently films named osama, baran, ararat, khandahar,.


http://www.suntimes.com/ebert/ebert_reviews/2001/03/030902.html

ONE DAY IN SEPTEMBER

***

March 9, 2001

A documentary featuring Ankie Spitzer, widow of Israeli fencing coach Andre Spitzer; terrorist Jamal Al Gashey; Alex Springer, son of Jacov Springer, Israeli weight-lifting coach and Olympic judge; wrestler Gad Zabari, and others.

Sony Pictures Classics presents a documentary directed by Kevin Macdonald. Narrated by Michael Douglas. Running time: 92 minutes. No MPAA rating.


BY ROGER EBERT

In September 1972, Palestinian terrorists invaded the athletes' quarters of the Munich Olympiad and took Israeli athletes hostage. By the following evening, 11 Israelis and five of the eight terrorists were dead.

Kevin Macdonald's documentary "One Day in September" retells these events in the style of a thriller, which is a little unsettling. It's one thing to see a fictional re-creation of facts, as in the re-creation of the Cuban missile crisis in "Thirteen Days," and another to see facts tarted up like fiction. Oh, it's exciting, all right, but do we feel ennobled to be thus entertained?

Macdonald brings remarkable research to the film. He has managed to obtain interviews with most of the key figures who are still alive, including the one surviving terrorist, Jamal Al Gashey, now in hiding "in Africa" (the two other survivors were killed by Israeli assassination squads). He talks to an Israeli athlete who escaped, the son of another and the widow of a third, to Israeli coaches and security experts, to German generals and police officers, to journalists who covered the event. His reporting is extraordinary, as he relentlessly builds up a case against the way the Germans and the International Olympic Committee handled the crisis.

Much is made of "German efficiency," Macdonald observes, but the Germans were so inefficient that they had no trained anti-terrorist squad, no security around the compound, no contingency plans, not even effective communication (a police sniper and a helicopter pilot were shot by German police who had not been told who they were). In a development that would be funny if it were not so sad, the Germans stationed a 747 jet on an airport runway as a getaway plane for the terrorists, and staffed it with cops dressed as the plane's crew; but minutes before the plane was to be used, the cops took a vote, decided they were not competent to handle the assignment and walked off the plane.

In a film filled with startling charges, the most shocking is that the three captured terrorists escaped from custody as part of a secret deal with the German government, which essentially wanted the whole matter to be over with. A German aircraft was hijacked by Palestinians, who demanded that the three prisoners be handed over, which they were, with "indecent haste." The film says the plane suspiciously contained only 12 passengers, none of them women or children; now Jamal Al Gashey confirms it was a setup.

As for the Olympic Committee, at first it intended to continue the games during the hostage crisis, and we see athletes of other nations training and relaxing within sight of the dorms where the Israelis were being held. After the games were suspended, thousands watched the standoff as if it were a show, while the Germans continued to bungle (officers crept onto the roof of the building, but the scene was broadcast live on TV, and the terrorists of course were watching the news).

The death of the innocent athletes was an avoidable tragedy, we conclude. If the Israeli secret service had been able to stage a raid, as it had wanted, it's likely many lives would have been saved. The final bloodbath resulted more from German bumbling than from anything else.

Still, one wonders why newsreel shots of Hitler and reminders of the Nazi past are necessary in a film that has almost no time at all to explain who the Palestinians were or why they made such a desperate raid. The raid had nothing to do with the Nazi past, and the current Germans seemed like comic-opera buffoons from a Groucho Marx comedy. If the purpose of a documentary is to inform, it could be argued that audiences already know a great deal about Hitler but are not likely to learn much from a couple of perfunctory shots of Palestinian refugee camps.

"One Day in September" grips the attention and is exciting and involving. I recommend it on that basis--and also because of the new information it contains. I was disturbed, however, by Macdonald's pumped-up style, and by a tasteless conclusion in which images of action, bloodshed and corpses are cut together into a montage and backed with rock music. What was he thinking of?

Footnote: When "One Day in September" won the Academy Award in 2000, its producer, Arthur Cohn, held up the Oscar and boasted, "and I won this without showing it in a single theater!" The documentary community is still angry about that remark. Cohn exhibits his Oscar entries at screenings peopled largely by those on his invitation list and to as few other people as possible. Under the academy bylaws, only those who have seen all five nominated docs can vote, and by limiting those who have seen his, Cohn shrinks the voting pool and improves his odds. Documentary groups and many individual filmmakers have protested this Oscar to the academy.


 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
Originally posted by: BugsBunny1078
Originally posted by: MegaWorks

Originally posted by: BugsBunny1078



Bill O'Reilly - "All terrorists are Muslims"







Bugs shut up or I will send this to the moderator

Excuse me but I was just quoting the oft quoted Mr Bill O'Reilly on something which he had just said on television the instant before I posted that. If you don't like it then blame him, for he is the one who said it.

You know those militant Irish muslims... :roll:
 

vansouza

Member
Sep 18, 2002
52
0
0
If the Arab world hates us because of Iraq was it love that caused them to fly into the WWCenter on 9-11?
 

MrPALCO

Banned
Nov 14, 1999
2,064
0
0


Some see the Arab world as a half a step up from a common prison yard.



The United States of America remains high above the fray but well able to turn the whole Middle East into a smoldering cinder, at a moments notice.



It is because of our great magnanimity that this has not happened. We have the power to grab all their oil. That alone must make them ?teeth gnashing? crazy!



Like any common thug, these Arabs will never taste real freedom but will remain behind bars.
 

MegaWorks

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2004
3,819
1
0
Originally posted by: MrPALCO
Some see the Arab world as a half a step up from a common prison yard.



The United States of America remains high above the fray but well able to turn the whole Middle East into a smoldering cinder, at a moments notice.



It is because of our great magnanimity that this has not happened. We have the power to grab all their oil.  That alone must make them ?teeth gnashing? crazy!



Like any common thug, these Arabs will never taste real freedom but will remain behind bars.

the problem is that your so call "freedom" is basically "you have to accept our ideas, goals, plans etc or you will get shot!". I don't realy see any signe of freedom in that
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Originally posted by: MrPALCO
Some see the Arab world as a half a step up from a common prison yard.
</p>


The United States of America remains high above the fray but well able to turn the whole Middle East into a smoldering cinder, at a moments notice.
</p>


It is because of our great magnanimity that this has not happened. We have the power to grab all their oil. That alone must make them ?teeth gnashing? crazy!
</p>


Like any common thug, these Arabs will never taste real freedom but will remain behind bars.</p>

Turning the whole Middle East into a smoldering cinder and grabbing all their oil sounds similar to something certain European countries are used to doing.