- Apr 27, 2012
- 10,086
- 58
- 86
The MTA has a new policy where ads can be barred if people react violently to them such as the case with the Civilized Man
Simply banning an ad that may “provoke violence” is little more than a call for anyone objecting to a particular message to threaten just that in the hope — and now the expectation — that the MTA will take the easy way out and veto the ad.
This is just wrong, it means that an ad that might offend some people could be barred and this is appeasement and pandering
This rule needs to be overturned and any ads should be allowed
Do you believe that this rule needs to be overturned and this is wrong?
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/10/mtas-new-ad-policy-encourages-more-vandalism-and-violence.html
Locked - OP apparently doesn't want this conversation to continue, AND there was no conversation, though I prefer sorbet or gelato to sherbet as well. -Admin DrPizza
Simply banning an ad that may “provoke violence” is little more than a call for anyone objecting to a particular message to threaten just that in the hope — and now the expectation — that the MTA will take the easy way out and veto the ad.
This is just wrong, it means that an ad that might offend some people could be barred and this is appeasement and pandering
This rule needs to be overturned and any ads should be allowed
Do you believe that this rule needs to be overturned and this is wrong?
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/10/mtas-new-ad-policy-encourages-more-vandalism-and-violence.html
Locked - OP apparently doesn't want this conversation to continue, AND there was no conversation, though I prefer sorbet or gelato to sherbet as well. -Admin DrPizza
Last edited by a moderator: