MSI GTX 680 TWIN FROZR - First look and hands on testing

TheGoat Eater

Golden Member
Mar 20, 2005
1,044
0
0
thegoateater.com
MSI GTX 680 Twin Frozr​
First look and hands on testing​


I was given a look at the new GTX 680 variant from MSI the GTX 680 Twin Frozr. This is a model that incorporates the Twin Frozr III cooling design. This design has twin 8cm PWM fans, large 8mm heat pipes, a one piece heat sink for memory and power components of the card, and a large copper base that is nickel plated. The interesting thing about the one piece heat sink is that it also functions to prevent the card from flexing when installed in a system. The “Propeller Blade” fans of the cooler are also a unique design that can produce 20% more airflow. The GTX 680 itself has all of the standard features of the model such as GPU Boost and Adaptive V-Sync. This Twin Frozr card features an Overclocked Core Base Clock of 1058MHz and Core Boost Clock of 1124 (over the standard 1006/1056) while the memory is clocked at 1502MHz.

The box design

img0010px.jpg



The card


img0029wfn.jpg



Testing the GTX 680 Twin Frozr​
Larger images for ease of seeing text​


The Card idles at 22c in my 18c room that I have been testing in. I then used MSI Kombustor to give it high load and stress it at its stock settings. I gave it 10 minutes and then looked at it (see picture below) I was happy to see that the temperature was not budging over 60c as the fan on auto was regulating that with little effort.

stockatautofanwithpostf.jpg



Now I am an overclocker and this card is perfect for overclocking with its great cooler design. I want to show what the card is capable of with this write up. I am sure that many of those who get this card will be trying to get more performance from it. I went about immediately; let’s face it this card is begging to be overclocked even more. I went about finding a good setting for the card, though this proves to be somewhat confusing with the new tech in the GTX 680. Adjusting to the use of offsets when working with the 680 is a new experience for me. I went about finding higher speeds that I would use by using a few different programs. By using Afterburner and is logging I was able to see the actual speed that the card was running. I did this by loading it with Kombustor Burn-in on DX11 using "Xtreme burn-in" with postFX and 8xMSAA in the settings. I found a very stable speed I wanted to use which was 1150MHz that would boost to 1215, with it pushing to 1228 at times from the auto clocking feature. I used the overlay feature of Afterburner on every benchmark I did to watch the GPU clock speed. I also used GPU-Z to look at what the actual MHz were with the offsets so I could gauge were I was. I also used the GPU-Z rendering test in some cases to get the actual speed captured in the screen-shots. I found the new feature that auto clocks the gpu up and down a bit of a challenge, as for those who want full power all the time are left wanting. I wish it was an option that the user had control over as there are times that you just want as much power as you can get, in games and benchmarks.


<<< System Summary >>>

> Mainboard : ASRock Z68 Extreme3 Gen3

> Chipset : Intel Z68

> Processor : Intel Core i7 2600K @ 5048-5096MHz

> Physical Memory : 4 x 4096 G.Skill 2133@ 2200~ 9-11-10-27

> Video Card : MSI GTX 680 Twin Frozr w/ Beta Driver 301.24

> Power Supply: Corsair

> Hard Disk : Corsair Force 3 SSD 120GB

> Operating System : Windows 7 Professional N Professional 6.01.7601 Service Pack 1 (64-bit)




The stability testing for 1150/2300/1806 @ 26 minutes with auto fan setting never letting the card go over 66c

yep25.jpg


Benchmarks with these settings:

Vantage
vantagekx.jpg


'06 @ Performance

3dmark0635873.jpg


'11 @ Performance

97738602.jpg


Heaven on Xtreme DX11

uniginedx11.jpg


Aquamark

samesettingsaquamark.jpg


Pushing the Limits of the card​

Pushing the limits I went as high as I could and found 1249core base with a boost clock of 1314 would run an actual 1300 when loaded in boost mode. For my favorite benchmark I spent time trying to get as much performance as I could on air and found a good speed to run at- 1300 actual core and 1860 on the memory.

The best result of my Aquamark tuning:

360845.jpg


Thoughts on testing and card performance​

Overall I am thrilled with the GTX 680's power and the performance of the Twin Frozr III cooler was great. I definitely like the fact that the card is so powerful yet the power draw is low for such a powerful card. Thinking back to the past top GTX cards power needs compared to this makes me happy I was able to pull these benches off with a Corsair HX650W. Yes I am definitely happy that I had no issues running a powerful system with the GTX 680 on only a 650W PSU with no issues. This overall is a great card and very powerful while staying cool with automatic fan control that quiet, I think that is a killer combination.

-Ryan

*I would like to thank MSI for allowing me to test this card*
 

SHAQ

Senior member
Aug 5, 2002
738
0
76
What were the temps at 1300 core? If you turn the fan speed all the way what are the temps at 1300 and how loud is it? Does it even allow manual fan speed adjustment?
 

TheGoat Eater

Golden Member
Mar 20, 2005
1,044
0
0
thegoateater.com
The Aquamark is a short and sweet benchmark and you can see on the Afterburner graph that it didn't get that hot at all for the short bench. My place is still a bit chilly coming into spring. If you look at the last picture and the graph, I made the numbers pop up on it that are vertically aligned for that Aquamark run. The fan is decently loud at full speed though its not as bad as some cards I have used. Afterburner allows for setting a fan speed, auto, and a user defined automatic setting.
 

daveybrat

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Jan 31, 2000
5,795
1,008
126
Very sexy heatsink on that. Great performance and cooling, nice review!
 

Lyfer

Diamond Member
May 28, 2003
5,842
2
81
Will this card be at the $500 price level? Or will it run $100 extra for the HSF premium?
 

IlllI

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2002
4,927
11
81
i guess $40 more isnt too bad. but any more and might be better off buying a 499 one and slapping an accelero on it.
 

Lyfer

Diamond Member
May 28, 2003
5,842
2
81
i guess $40 more isnt too bad. but any more and might be better off buying a 499 one and slapping an accelero on it.

Plus its factory overclocked, I think THIS IS THE CARD to get now.
 

tviceman

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2008
6,734
514
126
www.facebook.com

Ouch. I am disappointed in that price, especially since it's on a reference PCB. Usually the heatsink and fan premium for twin frozr II products is only $10-15, with the tricked out high factory OC versions commanding the $30-40 premium. Gigabyte has a triple-fan gtx680 coming; I will be curious to see how it's cooling performance measures up.
 

chimaxi83

Diamond Member
May 18, 2003
5,457
63
101
This card is still no different than any other reference card at the PCB level. Oh yea, solid caps. Meh :/
 

BallaTheFeared

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 2010
8,115
0
71
Yeah but it's totally worth $40 more because the reference cooler is loud and doesn't cool well, oh wait.

I guess if it was in stock while the $500 ones weren't I'd buy it, but yeah... Nvidia really stuck it to them aftermarket coolers.
 

gramboh

Platinum Member
May 3, 2003
2,207
0
0
Thanks for the review.

I'm willing to pay the premium, very happy with my MSI 560Ti OC Twin Frozr II, stays cool and quiet even at load and doesn't clog with dust (easy to clean). That is easily worth $40-45 to me (~8-9% price premium) on a top end card for me. Just gotta wait for it to be in stock at two places here in Canada to price match.
 

razorhawx

Junior Member
Sep 6, 2012
5
0
0
Hey I m from india, i have a question....can my corsair tx 750 v2 handle this beast(gtx680 twin frozr3)
my specs:
mobo:asus m5a99x evo
cpu:fx 8150
chassis: haf 922
gpu:6870
i am planning to buy one this weekend if not next, so any suggestions are welcome, also can my psu handle if I buy the lightning edition with twin frozr 4?
thanks in advance guys!!!
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
Hey I m from india, i have a question....can my corsair tx 750 v2 handle this beast(gtx680 twin frozr3)
my specs:
mobo:asus m5a99x evo
cpu:fx 8150
chassis: haf 922
gpu:6870
i am planning to buy one this weekend if not next, so any suggestions are welcome, also can my psu handle if I buy the lightning edition with twin frozr 4?
thanks in advance guys!!!

- Your PSU is fine.
- Your CPU is too slow to take full advantage of the MSI Lightning 680 card
- Get an MSI Power Edition 670 if you want to go NV route and save yourself some $.
 

Shmee

Memory & Storage, Graphics Cards Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 13, 2008
8,048
2,991
146
were you able to over volt at all? your review didnt make that clear, and I was wondering if the voltage control on it is any better than on a stock 680. Last I heard, voltage control was generally locked out.
 

TheGoat Eater

Golden Member
Mar 20, 2005
1,044
0
0
thegoateater.com
yes, you can overvolt the core as with most 680s, the 680 Lightning though has the ability of overvolting GPU core/ mem / aux. The 6xx series was/is difficult to deal with from the Nvidia designs. The GPU core voltage offset is capped via afterburner by MSI at +100mV I believe. This is for the public version, as others are not publicly available (read: NDA)
 

chimaxi83

Diamond Member
May 18, 2003
5,457
63
101
yes, you can overvolt the core as with most 680s, the 680 Lightning though has the ability of overvolting GPU core/ mem / aux. The 6xx series was/is difficult to deal with from the Nvidia designs. The GPU core voltage offset is capped via afterburner by MSI at +100mV I believe. This is for the public version, as others are not publicly available (read: NDA)

I think you have that backwards. Most 680's offer zero voltage control. That +100 in Afterburner does nothing to increase maximum voltage. Some people have been flashing modified BIOS files to their cards, with some of them having success unlocking some kind of control, or at least increasing the maximum that the card will use.
 

TheGoat Eater

Golden Member
Mar 20, 2005
1,044
0
0
thegoateater.com
I think many don't realize that when they are talking about voltage on the 6xx series it is on a sliding scale. This is due to the Dynamic Overclocking feature that will overclock and underclock as it sees fit. I have hated this as it is terrible for consistency in my hobby of overclocking and extreme overclocking, as it is literally decided by the card. While the card goes up or down with dynamic overclocking the voltage does to. This is a feature that I do like as a consumer as it will be good for my bills over the long run. As that is on the sliding scale the mV offset is there to help with the upper ranges. The card by no means whatsoever is set at a voltage unless it was hard-modded or someone is getting a BIOS from R&D from companies. What they are really doing when they are doing when looking to flash another BIOS is that they are hoping for a higher base voltage - think a reference card's stock voltage and GTX 680 Lightning's voltage - still on a slider but elevated over the reference to ensure higher clocks out of the box. So this higher flashed voltage PLUS an GPU mV offset bumped to max will be a definite help with overclocking that card. Though I will say that with the different 680, 670, 660 card builds you better be sure it will be compatible. I don't encourage most to do this at all, but to each their own.

So in summary - you are partially right, their is no Public way to set a constant voltage increase. Though you do increase the voltage in these cards via an offset due to the new 6xx series dynamic overclocking feature
 

chimaxi83

Diamond Member
May 18, 2003
5,457
63
101
The offset setting still doesn't let you go above 1.175V (old version of Afterburner), which in reality was really 1.215V measured with a multimeter. The new versions of Afterburner accurately report that voltage now. Anyway, I hard modded my old DC II 680 for my voltage fix :D