• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

MP3 Encoder

Another vote for EAC + LAME.

Personally, I use Ogg Vorbis rather than MP3, so I use Vorbis Tools along with EAC 🙂


Confused
 
Originally posted by: jliechty
I use EAC + LAME for ripping from a CD, and the RazorLame frontend if I need to encode recorded WAV files.

Why bother with another program when EAC can do everything itself! 🙂


Just my £0.02


Confused
 
Originally posted by: Confused
Originally posted by: jliechty
I use EAC + LAME for ripping from a CD, and the RazorLame frontend if I need to encode recorded WAV files.
Why bother with another program when EAC can do everything itself! 🙂

Just my £0.02

Confused
Hmm, I thought EAC was primarily for ripping CDs and encoding them. I use RazorLame when I have a file recorded in SoundForge that I need to convert to MP3 format (I think Lame produces better output and has more options than SF's built-in MP3 encoder).
 
Originally posted by: neil
EAC with Lame 3.90.3 --alt-preset extreme

Why do you choose 'preset extreme' over 'standard'? The increase in sound quality is marginal at best but the bitrate is ~25% (?) higher.

Most of the known problem cases for 'standard' are due to limitations of the mp3 format itself (and to a lesser degree the psychoacoustic model that LAME uses), you aren't likely to see much improvement even if you switched to 'insane'.

Besides, the main reason for the existence of 'extreme' is only to discourage people from trying to improve 'standard' by experimenting with additional command-line options (and screwing up in the process).
 
Quote

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: neil
EAC with Lame 3.90.3 --alt-preset extreme
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Why do you choose 'preset extreme' over 'standard'? The increase in sound quality is marginal at best but the bitrate is ~25% (?) higher.

Most of the known problem cases for 'standard' are due to limitations of the mp3 format itself (and to a lesser degree the psychoacoustic model that LAME uses), you aren't likely to see much improvement even if you switched to 'insane'.

Besides, the main reason for the existence of 'extreme' is only to discourage people from trying to improve 'standard' by experimenting with additional command-line options (and screwing up in the process).

when i was using --alt-preset extreme it just gave me a warm fuzzy feeling over --aps.

Now, for the last ~1.5years i have been using mpc for all my encoding adventures, and i couldnt be happier. (well, if there was hardware support for musepack that would make me happier......but until then i live.)



-neil
 
Back
Top