• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Moveon.org does it again.

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: blackangst1

Man you absolutely suck at comprehension. Is english your second language?

It IS exactly what I said it is: lies, deceit, and misrepresentation of our military.

Was it American troops they pictured not once, but TWICE? And once photoshopped? NO.
*That would be a lie. TWICE. Knowingly.
Was it a representation of our military? No. It was another country's PORTRAYED as ours. Not once, but twice, and once photoshopped.
*That is called deceit. TWICE. Knowingly.
See my Question above.
*That is called misrepresentation.

quit apologizing. it REALLY, and I mean REALLY makes you look like an ass.

Uh oh, someone's getting grumpy now! As has been asked at least twice in this thread by me, and more by other people, what did moveon.org stand to gain by putting this picture there instead of another picture with actual US troops? What was their motivation to lie? I can't think of one. Because there is exactly zero motive, it is far more likely to believe that it was a mistake. That's of course if you are a reasonable person who isn't looking to make stupid threads on ATPN.

As for misrepresentation, how exactly did it misrepresent our troops? The dictionary definition of misrepresentation is "an untrue representation, usually an unfavorable one". What unfavorable thing is being presented here? That our soldiers wear pants? That they eat? Again, what is the motive here? Any person with a brain would immediately see that there isn't one.

So while I know you're mad that you got called out for making an idiotic thread on here, it's not going to change the fact that it's still an idiotic thread. Just admit it. It will feel good... you'll feel free. Liberated. You don't need to cling to this with your kung-fu grip, because it's not worth it.

What was their motivation? Who the hell knows. But why couldnt they post a REAL pic? Hmmm? The better question is WHY. WHY TWICE!

Im not mad. Im frustrated by your apparent blindness and now lack of knowledge of the military you served in. Pretty pathetic. It's like arguing with a 6 year old-logic doesnt work.

Would a "real" pic have made their point any less valid? What if they had posted the photo-op pic of Bush feeding the troops a fake turkey? Would that have made their point stronger?

The point is that our troops are in a war zone for Thanksgiving while you are posting on a message board about how bad a group of people fighting to get them home is for using a photo of other soldiers in the same exact situation that our troops are in?

I think that you need to take a longer look into the glare off of you monitor so you can see who the real desperate partisan hack really is.
 
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: blackangst1

youre so full of shit Lemon.

Here?s the script: ?Some folks won?t be home this holiday season. 150,000 American men and women are stuck in Iraq. Their president misled America to send them in and has no plan to get them out. Democrats in Congress are leading the way home. Where are the Republicans? Tell your representative, ?Support our troops. Bring them home.??

See the bolded part? It's flat out bullshit. The Democrats havent, and arent, doing SQUAT to get the troops home. Sure a few fringe Dems have tried introducing legislation, but the majority have no intention nor the desire to end this war. Need proof? Start pouring through voting records.

Nice try though.

See? There you go. Now we're talking about the content of the ad instead of a stupid picture. Now you can try to make a rational argument as to why moveon is being dishonest or whatever without having to say "HURR HURR WRONG PANTS".

This is much better.

It's just lies wrapped in lies. *shrug*

Why not expose every layer?

As far as your comment about being Navy...I concede. You rightfully have no idea what our Army wears. I rushed to conclusion, based on most who say "I was in the military" were Army or Marines. My apologies 🙂 And TY for serving.

 
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: blackangst1

youre so full of shit Lemon.

Here?s the script: ?Some folks won?t be home this holiday season. 150,000 American men and women are stuck in Iraq. Their president misled America to send them in and has no plan to get them out. Democrats in Congress are leading the way home. Where are the Republicans? Tell your representative, ?Support our troops. Bring them home.??

See the bolded part? It's flat out bullshit. The Democrats havent, and arent, doing SQUAT to get the troops home. Sure a few fringe Dems have tried introducing legislation, but the majority have no intention nor the desire to end this war. Need proof? Start pouring through voting records.

Nice try though.

See? There you go. Now we're talking about the content of the ad instead of a stupid picture. Now you can try to make a rational argument as to why moveon is being dishonest or whatever without having to say "HURR HURR WRONG PANTS".

This is much better.

It's just lies wrapped in lies. *shrug*

Why not expose every layer?

As far as your comment about being Navy...I concede. You rightfully have no idea what our Army wears. I rushed to conclusion, based on most who say "I was in the military" were Army or Marines. My apologies 🙂 And TY for serving.

Because some things are probably mistakes, and some things aren't. You're right that the Democrats haven't done much to bring the troops home... so why not beat them up on things that are meaningful instead of focusing on a picture? It's the same thing as people making fun of Nancy Pelosi's dress instead of talking about what she's doing. It clouds legitimate issues with layers of crap, and I hate it.

EDIT: Oh, thanks for being big enough to apologize by the way, a lot of people on here, sometimes myself included, wouldn't do that.
 
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: blackangst1

youre so full of shit Lemon.

Here?s the script: ?Some folks won?t be home this holiday season. 150,000 American men and women are stuck in Iraq. Their president misled America to send them in and has no plan to get them out. Democrats in Congress are leading the way home. Where are the Republicans? Tell your representative, ?Support our troops. Bring them home.??

See the bolded part? It's flat out bullshit. The Democrats havent, and arent, doing SQUAT to get the troops home. Sure a few fringe Dems have tried introducing legislation, but the majority have no intention nor the desire to end this war. Need proof? Start pouring through voting records.

Nice try though.

See? There you go. Now we're talking about the content of the ad instead of a stupid picture. Now you can try to make a rational argument as to why moveon is being dishonest or whatever without having to say "HURR HURR WRONG PANTS".

This is much better.

It's just lies wrapped in lies. *shrug*

Why not expose every layer?

As far as your comment about being Navy...I concede. You rightfully have no idea what our Army wears. I rushed to conclusion, based on most who say "I was in the military" were Army or Marines. My apologies 🙂 And TY for serving.

Because some things are probably mistakes, and some things aren't. You're right that the Democrats haven't done much to bring the troops home... so why not beat them up on things that are meaningful instead of focusing on a picture? It's the same thing as people making fun of Nancy Pelosi's dress instead of talking about what she's doing. It clouds legitimate issues with layers of crap, and I hate it.

EDIT: Oh, thanks for being big enough to apologize by the way, a lot of people on here, sometimes myself included, wouldn't do that.

Im not picking on the Democrats, only on moveon.org. And it wasnt a mistake. If it were, it wouldnt have been repeated. It was a deliberate deception.

As far as apologizing, it really isnt a big deal to me. I have no problem admitting when Im wrong when I am, or when I speak out turn, when I do. Anyway.
 
Originally posted by: blackangst1

Im not picking on the Democrats, only on moveon.org. And it wasnt a mistake. If it were, it wouldnt have been repeated. It was a deliberate deception.

As far as apologizing, it really isnt a big deal to me. I have no problem admitting when Im wrong when I am, or when I speak out turn, when I do. Anyway.

Still going to have to disagree. There's no motive. If you can find something they would have gained from doing this, let me know and I'll reconsider. Until that time there is simply no reason to believe it was deliberate.
 
I'm picturing these 2 graphics guys at moveon, just got done a bowlful
"Dude, look at my photoshop of these brits, I gave him PANTS!"
"LOL DUDE"
"Let's do it in the next ad and see how long it takes the tighty righties to freak"
"DUDE!!"
"DUDE!!"
high fives and big laffs

 
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Well, I for one, am not suprised at the - ahem - ad, nor the reaction to it.

To me, it's a pretty good representation of not only the Democrats, but those who claim to be them. Naive and stupid.

/cue "But Bush! But Bush! But Bush!"

Yeah, because THIS thread is just overflowing with intelligence and clear thinking from you :roll:

This is the kind of dumb non-issue that only appeals to folks who can't actually make a real argument. Like those pictures of John Kerry awkwardly throwing a football, it might make a good punchline, but only a moron would try to use it as a stand-in for a real argument.

eh?

I can't think of anything less important than whether or not MoveOn.org used a correct picture of our troops or not in their ad. You obviously think it's important enough to mention, and you apparently are highly bothered by it. This leads me to believe one of two things about you. Either that you are dumb enough that you think this is ACTUALLY an important issue, or you are just a partisan tool trying to make political hay out of something you know doesn't matter.

its very important you tool. they say to bring home our troops but done even know what a American troop uniform looks like. oh and not once but twice. to me this this screams that moveon.org cares more about slinging mud at the republicans than the content or accuracy of their message or images.

for the record before you start calling me a neocon, bushie or some other stupid label. i am a registered independent. I hate both parties and a stunt like this is exactly why.

Well last time I checked, you can REGISTER as anything you like, doesn't make it so. Now I'm not sure why you're so defensive, since I hardly ever use "stupid labels" to describe anyone, and I don't think I've ever called you anything. But since you brought it up, for someone who's "independent", you seem to come to the defense of Republican issues almost exclusively, claiming independence as political cover. Here's a hint, being "independent" means being independent, that's how political leanings work. If you quack like a duck and walk like a duck, don't get all uppity when people call you a duck. Of course that has nothing to do with the point I was trying to make, but since I wasn't talking to you and you still felt compelled to act like a big jackass...well...

And of course that's what this "screams" to you about MoveOn.org...it's not like you were waiting for this to think that. That was my entire point, that this is just a good excuse for what some people were thinking anyways. I'm not sure why being able to identify the correct kinds of uniforms our troops wear is important to holding a political opinion on Iraq, but if it IS a requirement, I think most Americans on both sides need to sit down and shut up. But honestly, I can't quite get my head around the uniform issue...other than the fact that it's a good "OMG" fake judgement moment and a good way to bash a group you don't like without actually having to make an argument. Unless you can explain to me why being able to correctly identify US troop informs is required to hold an opinion on Iraq. And if so, what other military knowledge is required? Should people be able to identify the differences between a Bradley and a tank? How about identifying which fighter aircraft the Navy operates and which ones the Air Force owns? (OMG, MoveOn.org said F-15's land on aircraft carriers, they are so stupid!?!?!? lolololo!!!!!!111).

Honestly, it's a stupid mistake that they should have caught, but it has fuck-all to do with their point, and you know it.
 
Originally posted by: blackangst1
...
Im not picking on the Democrats, only on moveon.org. And it wasnt a mistake. If it were, it wouldnt have been repeated. It was a deliberate deception.
...

That's silly, why in the world would MoveOn.org INTENTIONALLY use a picture of the wrong troops? There is no motive, they don't gain anything by having done so.
 
Originally posted by: Rainsford
That's silly, why in the world would MoveOn.org INTENTIONALLY use a picture of the wrong troops? There is no motive, they don't gain anything by having done so.

Maybe they saved a few bucks on the photo...
 
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: blackangst1
...
Im not picking on the Democrats, only on moveon.org. And it wasnt a mistake. If it were, it wouldnt have been repeated. It was a deliberate deception.
...

That's silly, why in the world would MoveOn.org INTENTIONALLY use a picture of the wrong troops? There is no motive, they don't gain anything by having done so.

Lack of intelligence? There really is no other answer.

Unless you have one? Why would they? and better yet, why WOULDNT they use a REAL pic of American troops? And why would they photoshop one?
 
The big question is: if the Bush Administration took a photo of people in ... Jordan and put it on an advertisement saying "12% gain in morale in Iraq" would you be upset? Even if the statistics were true?
 
OK, Blackangst1- MoveOn, or whoever made the ad, goofed again. Making more out of it than that is really silly...

Photoshopped? OK- they took it from pics on hand, one that fit into the thanksgiving scenario- troops in the chowline, rather than home with their families... More to it than that? only in the minds of the truly paranoid... or somebody ready to whine about anything moveon does...

I'd have preferred the one of Bush serving plastic turkey- it'd really fit a whole lot better into the truth of what he's been serving everybody all along...
 
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: blackangst1
...
Im not picking on the Democrats, only on moveon.org. And it wasnt a mistake. If it were, it wouldnt have been repeated. It was a deliberate deception.
...

That's silly, why in the world would MoveOn.org INTENTIONALLY use a picture of the wrong troops? There is no motive, they don't gain anything by having done so.

Lack of intelligence? There really is no other answer.

Unless you have one? Why would they? and better yet, why WOULDNT they use a REAL pic of American troops? And why would they photoshop one?

Whoa, there skipper. Making a dumb mistake isn't a "motive"...it's a reason. I'm inclined to agree that it was probably somebody being stupid, but you said it was a "deliberate deception" and not a mistake, something completely different. If they were INTENTIONALLY using the wrong photo, why would they do that? Lack of intelligence may be the real reason, but it kind of precludes doing it intentionally, don't you think?
 
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Whoa, there skipper. Making a dumb mistake isn't a "motive"...it's a reason. I'm inclined to agree that it was probably somebody being stupid, but you said it was a "deliberate deception" and not a mistake, something completely different. If they were INTENTIONALLY using the wrong photo, why would they do that? Lack of intelligence may be the real reason, but it kind of precludes doing it intentionally, don't you think?

Perhaps if they hadn't done the same "stupid" thing last year, one could excuse it. Perhaps.
 
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Whoa, there skipper. Making a dumb mistake isn't a "motive"...it's a reason. I'm inclined to agree that it was probably somebody being stupid, but you said it was a "deliberate deception" and not a mistake, something completely different. If they were INTENTIONALLY using the wrong photo, why would they do that? Lack of intelligence may be the real reason, but it kind of precludes doing it intentionally, don't you think?

Perhaps if they hadn't done the same "stupid" thing last year, one could excuse it. Perhaps.

So are you trying to say it was intentional? If so, why? If not are you trying to say that showing troops with different colored pants is inexcusable? If so, why?
 
Originally posted by: eskimospy
So are you trying to say it was intentional? If so, why? If not are you trying to say that showing troops with different colored pants is inexcusable? If so, why?

I don't know if it was intentional, but the fact that it happened 2 years in a row certainly lends credence to the idea.
 
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: eskimospy
So are you trying to say it was intentional? If so, why? If not are you trying to say that showing troops with different colored pants is inexcusable? If so, why?

I don't know if it was intentional, but the fact that it happened 2 years in a row certainly lends credence to the idea.

Same question to you then, what did it accomplish for Moveon.org? What was their motive for doing so? Is moveon just doing it out of sheer villainy and hatred of The Troops, hoping to shatter their morale with poor fashion depiction?
 
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Same question to you then, what did it accomplish for Moveon.org? What was their motive for doing so? Is moveon just doing it out of sheer villainy and hatred of The Troops, hoping to shatter their morale with poor fashion depiction?

How could you expect me to ascribe MoveOn's motive? I don't have a clue why they chose to do this 2 years in a row. I'd certainly like to believe they didn't know any better, but that might require...the willing suspension of disbelief.
 
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Same question to you then, what did it accomplish for Moveon.org? What was their motive for doing so? Is moveon just doing it out of sheer villainy and hatred of The Troops, hoping to shatter their morale with poor fashion depiction?

How could you expect me to ascribe MoveOn's motive? I don't have a clue why they chose to do this 2 years in a row. I'd certainly like to believe they didn't know any better, but that might require...the willing suspension of disbelief.

Then what are you whining about? Did they break a law or are they gaining something immorally? What is yoiur objection?

Either they did it accidetnally or they did it on purpose. If they did it on purpose what did they gain? The only thing I can see they could gain would be publicity for the fact we have a lot of troops stuck in Iraq, many serving their 3rd or 4th tour of duty. Does that somehow strike a nerve in you? :laugh:
 
I'm not sure of the reason behind that picture but whatever it is the message is the same and that's what's important. Well, unless you want to steer or deter the message.
 
Back
Top