Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: tweaker2
well, let's see here....seeing as if hillary was the first one, YES, the FIRST ONE to start slinging mud between the two, and seeing as if she kept it up throughout the remainder of the primaries, thus forcing obama to respond in kind, and seeing as if she cast the spell of denial, spitefullness, pettiness and divisiveness over her supporters, i would think her supporters should be taking it all out on her and not obama, as obama waged a smart defensive battle of counterpunching hillary's and mccain's cheap shots almost to the very end of the process.
why should they focus their ire at obama when it was hillary's failure to represent the party and her supporters with the diginity and respect some of them are now demanding from the rest of the party?
the whole timbre of the dem primary can be laid at hillary's feet. she kept changing her style of attacks, progressively getting meaner and dirtier the more she fell behind obama.
all obama was doing was staying with his program and taking side trips to the gutter to duke it out with hillary and mccain as that was her and mccain's choice of playing field.
yet, somehow it's all obama's fault. he ran a smart campaing and hillary didn't.
so if there's any one person that the hillary supporters are supposed to mad at, it's hillary herself.
*edit* - well, hillary and bill.
Real quick though, Hillary was not the first one to start the attacks. Obama and Edwards lit her up early on. This isn't a bad thing, it's politics.
fair enough. i stand corrected. thanks.