Oyeve
Lifer
- Oct 18, 1999
 
- 22,071
 
- 885
 
- 126
 
Originally posted by: Imp
Many of those top cars look like what rich kids get from their daddies or step daddies...
So the cops figure they can affors to pay the fine.
Originally posted by: Imp
Many of those top cars look like what rich kids get from their daddies or step daddies...
Originally posted by: Oyeve
My GF. I swear, she gets at least 50 tickets a year. Always has to go to mandatory classes. Most are parking violations.
Originally posted by: TallBill
Wonder if the Crown Victoria was part of the survey since it's not in production anymore. I've literally been waved at by cops running radar on the side of the road![]()
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: TallBill
Wonder if the Crown Victoria was part of the survey since it's not in production anymore. I've literally been waved at by cops running radar on the side of the road![]()
lol, you were driving a retired unmarked cruiser?![]()
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: Nyati13
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
The Mazda6 is in strange company at the bottom, there.
I'm surprised at the Subaru Outback making the top 10, the WRX/STi I could see easily, but the station wagon?
Outback can run![]()
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Why don't some of you think this is a good measure? Obviously a model of car that does more miles (collectively) will get more tickets. This is normalised by dividing out the number of miles driven, leaving a value for the number of tickets given that doesn't depend on the number of cars on the road, nor the number of miles driven. This is essentially how likely you are to be pulled over if you're driving one of those cars.
This is not difficult logic, did you guys even go to high school?
Originally posted by: Oyeve
My GF. I swear, she gets at least 50 tickets a year. Always has to go to mandatory classes. Most are parking violations.
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Why don't some of you think this is a good measure? Obviously a model of car that does more miles (collectively) will get more tickets. This is normalised by dividing out the number of miles driven, leaving a value for the number of tickets given that doesn't depend on the number of cars on the road, nor the number of miles driven. This is essentially how likely you are to be pulled over if you're driving one of those cars.
This is not difficult logic, did you guys even go to high school?
Originally posted by: Mr Pickles
Violations per 100,000 miles driven, expressed as percentage of average
I'm not a math wizard so I don't know if my logic is right but maybe hummers just aren't driven as many 100k miles as other cars. Does that make sense?
Originally posted by: TallBill
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: TallBill
Wonder if the Crown Victoria was part of the survey since it's not in production anymore. I've literally been waved at by cops running radar on the side of the road![]()
lol, you were driving a retired unmarked cruiser?![]()
No, it's just a black Crown Vic with a 1.5 foot antennae on the back. Looks like an unmarked tho![]()
Originally posted by: keird
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: Nyati13
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
The Mazda6 is in strange company at the bottom, there.
I'm surprised at the Subaru Outback making the top 10, the WRX/STi I could see easily, but the station wagon?
Outback can run![]()
Sure I could have tried to run, but my Mom was in the passenger seat. I knew what I was being pulled over for when I saw the cop look at me. $50 ticket.
<---- expired inspection sticker. He got nervous when he gave it to me too. He began citing my extensive history with an expired sticker in 2006 and told me to "take care of my business". I wanted to shove him in a desert, away from his family and make him eat MREs and hot water for a year.
Originally posted by: Strk
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Why don't some of you think this is a good measure? Obviously a model of car that does more miles (collectively) will get more tickets. This is normalised by dividing out the number of miles driven, leaving a value for the number of tickets given that doesn't depend on the number of cars on the road, nor the number of miles driven. This is essentially how likely you are to be pulled over if you're driving one of those cars.
This is not difficult logic, did you guys even go to high school?
Not necessarily
A model with more miles collectively won't be as affected by a few bad drivers. A MB CLS63 AMG is extremely rare. You only need one or two bad drivers to throw off the results. The driver also matters a lot. You also have higher volume, but lower mileage cars; that is, they may sell more, but have a lower annual mileage. I'd say look at the Park Avenue. It probably has one of the highest median ages on that list (I.e. likely owned by retirees who don't travel much).
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: AstroManLuca
So basically, cops don't want to give tickets to old people, soccer moms, or rednecks?Sharing the bottom of the list? Buicks, minivans and pickups.
EDIT: Also this makes me happy that I got a Honda Fit instead of a Scion xD. Virtually the same car, but one has a reputation and the other doesn't.
I think the measure is weird... per 1k mile driven. There are tons of buicks, minivans and pickups that rack up a lot of mileage.
Originally posted by: DainBramaged
Looks like I'm safe.![]()
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
The Mazda6 is in strange company at the bottom, there.
Originally posted by: txrandom
They need to divide those numbers by the population of each car. You can already tell it's skewed at the bottom because a Jaguar XJ Sedan is the lowest.
Or maybe I'm wrong if they did it like Argo said. But it's still going to be skewed if you have a low population.
*Violations per 100,000 miles driven, expressed as percentage of average.
