This is kind of what YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook, are already doing, sort of, except that they are just banning content altogether.
Yeah, it's kind of complex, but also prone to groupthink. Only Mark knows who I actually work for, but let's just say I had interesting info ahead of time on this human malware situation as it evolved. Obviously I couldn't just blow my sources and lose clearance, so I kept trying to find publicly posted content to try to educate people on the situation. It's outside of my specialties, but a rapid study of the particulars yielded vast insights relatively quickly.
What I discovered was that the overwhelming amount of info on Google searches, news items, subreddits, etc were horribly blasé and clear regurgitations of the 'official' story from China at any point in time even after the evidence was mounting that it was incorrect.
Not only that, but a lot of links would just disappear entirely that passed key datapoints along in an attempt to wash away some of the nonsense that was holding back proper responses.
I notice this same kind of groupthink abuse with regards to anyone who even dares to go outside of the dusty old academia-approved stories of the development of past human civilizations, when it's clear to any logical thinker that a lot of the story we built from many 19th to early 20th century religiously backed digs and expeditions is either horrendously incomplete or just outright wrong. The entire area of study is rife with what I like to call 'last inhabitant assignment bias', attributing installations and sites to populations whom lacked the technology and resources to create them in the first place. So, anyone who dares to analyze beyond the creaky old textbooks is demonized and demonitized as if they were cranks yelling about lizard people.
Back to the context of Userbenchmark, I do think there's a growing consensus that they've really screwed this up, and I think the more people get that info out the better. Tech channels such as HUB, GN, LTT, J2C, etc all do a pretty solid to outstanding job of fairly analyzing things. The community at large tends to usually lock into groupthink however, leading to some just bizarre behavior.
Maybe some people just don't want subtlety and complexity, or understand tiers of pro/cons. They want simple AMD good, Intel bad, or Intel good, AMD bad. It's mostly the former at the moment, which leads to some strange self-sabotage for a number of people. Logic is so much more powerful when applied in a granular, uninhibited manner.