• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

More 9/11 bodies "identified"

G

glugglug

Diamond Member
More propaganda B.S. from our government. Supposedly the bodies of a flight attendant and a passenger from one of the planes that hit the towers were identified. So people who obviously would have died near the ignition point of the fireball that was allegedly above 2700F in order to melt the steel (even though jet fuel doesn't get above 1800F), had remains left intact enough to be identified.

Sorry, not buying it.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/11/02/wtc.remains.reut/
 
Uhhh...remains. Meaning portions of bodies. It makes sense if they cut to pieces and some pieces were ejected out the other side of the building and fell to the ground.
 
Originally posted by: glugglug
More propaganda B.S. from our government. Supposedly the bodies of a flight attendant and a passenger from one of the planes that hit the towers were identified. So people who obviously would have died near the ignition point of the fireball that was allegedly above 2700F in order to melt the steel (even though jet fuel doesn't get above 1800F), had remains left intact enough to be identified.

Sorry, not buying it.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/11/02/wtc.remains.reut/
Click to expand...

Dude. Come on.

It's perfectly plausible they will find 1" pieces.

DNA.

Forensic science.

Is any of this getting through? Do I need to draw a picture perhaps?
 
Originally posted by: glugglug
More propaganda B.S. from our government. Supposedly the bodies of a flight attendant and a passenger from one of the planes that hit the towers were identified. So people who obviously would have died near the ignition point of the fireball that was allegedly above 2700F in order to melt the steel (even though jet fuel doesn't get above 1800F), had remains left intact enough to be identified.

Sorry, not buying it.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/11/02/wtc.remains.reut/
Click to expand...

Sorry you don't know New York.

It is very much like Disney World in Florida. There is more underground than above.

When the first plane hit, the nose of the plane went through and parts sprayed out on the other side. They picked up the metal parts but the small body parts washed down the man hole covers with drain holes on top. There are trillions of these manhole covers that they are not all touched in many years if ever at all.

Oh by the way. The front of the plane was in front of your 'Fireball".
 
They lied so many times that I wouldn't believe them if they said the sky was blue. Regardless of anything else.

Their credibility = 0
 
I started reading this thread and I thought it was finally something that we would all agree on (the OP being crazy), then of course Aelius jumps in here with his ranting.
 
Originally posted by: JD50
I started reading this thread and I thought it was finally something that we would all agree on (the OP being crazy), then of course Aelius jumps in here with his ranting.
Click to expand...

So it doesn't bother you that these people lie so much?

Well it does bother me. Official findings are about as conclusive as the "mushroom cloud" comment.

I simply refuse to take whatever the government says for granted. They lost any credibility.

Now if there is a real, honest to God, investigation (of all things related to 9/11) with no party hacks, no overbearing from any party and they say this is the case then I will 100% agree with them.

Ever going to happen? Well I'm just a Canadian. I can't ask your rep to do for you what every American has a right to ask for... or not ask for I guess.

All I'm saying is that I refuse to take whatever they say for granted anymore. Period.
 
Originally posted by: Aelius
Originally posted by: JD50
I started reading this thread and I thought it was finally something that we would all agree on (the OP being crazy), then of course Aelius jumps in here with his ranting.
Click to expand...

So it doesn't bother you that these people lie so much?

Well it does bother me. Official findings are about as conclusive as the "mushroom cloud" comment.

I simply refuse to take whatever the government says for granted. They lost any credibility.

Now if there is a real, honest to God, investigation (of all things related to 9/11) with no party hacks, no overbearing from any party and they say this is the case then I will 100% agree with them.

Ever going to happen? Well I'm just a Canadian. I can't ask your rep to do for you what every American has a right to ask for... or not ask for I guess.

All I'm saying is that I refuse to take whatever they say for granted anymore. Period.
Click to expand...

No, you said that you will not believe them even if they say the sky is blue, meaning you wouldn't believe a thing they say, no matter what. You are just as radical as the people you blindly criticize.

 
Originally posted by: JD50
Originally posted by: Aelius
Originally posted by: JD50
I started reading this thread and I thought it was finally something that we would all agree on (the OP being crazy), then of course Aelius jumps in here with his ranting.
Click to expand...

So it doesn't bother you that these people lie so much?

Well it does bother me. Official findings are about as conclusive as the "mushroom cloud" comment.

I simply refuse to take whatever the government says for granted. They lost any credibility.

Now if there is a real, honest to God, investigation (of all things related to 9/11) with no party hacks, no overbearing from any party and they say this is the case then I will 100% agree with them.

Ever going to happen? Well I'm just a Canadian. I can't ask your rep to do for you what every American has a right to ask for... or not ask for I guess.

All I'm saying is that I refuse to take whatever they say for granted anymore. Period.
Click to expand...

No, you said that you will not believe them even if they say the sky is blue, meaning you wouldn't believe a thing they say, no matter what. You are just as radical as the people you blindly criticize.
Click to expand...

Way to misslead people. True indi investigation = trusthworthy government = nope
 
We need a fully independent investigation into whether the sky is blue. The Blue Sky thought police are taking over the world.
 
Originally posted by: Gibsons
We need a fully independent investigation into whether the sky is blue. The Blue Sky thought police are taking over the world.
Click to expand...

Nice fallacy.

The color of the sky is arguable depending on how one looks at the issue. In a single dimensional view sure it's blue. However it could be green or even black.

Which is why I used that as an example. Not surprised it went right over the head of some people as they knee jerked a response.
 
:laugh:
Originally posted by: Aelius
Originally posted by: Gibsons
We need a fully independent investigation into whether the sky is blue. The Blue Sky thought police are taking over the world.
Click to expand...

Nice fallacy.

The color of the sky is arguable depending on how one looks at the issue. In a single dimensional view sure it's blue. However it could be green or even black.

Which is why I used that as an example. Not surprised it went right over the head of some people as they knee jerked a response.
Click to expand...

Green huh? Well maybe over Gary Indiana.......
 
Originally posted by: Aelius
Originally posted by: Gibsons
We need a fully independent investigation into whether the sky is blue. The Blue Sky thought police are taking over the world.
Click to expand...

Nice fallacy.

The color of the sky is arguable depending on how one looks at the issue. In a single dimensional view sure it's blue. However it could be green or even black.

Which is why I used that as an example. Not surprised it went right over the head of some people as they knee jerked a response.
Click to expand...

Just making about about stupid and irrational points of view, using your analogy. Nothing went over my head, I understand hyperbole quite well.
 
Originally posted by: Gibsons
Originally posted by: Aelius
Originally posted by: Gibsons
We need a fully independent investigation into whether the sky is blue. The Blue Sky thought police are taking over the world.
Click to expand...

Nice fallacy.

The color of the sky is arguable depending on how one looks at the issue. In a single dimensional view sure it's blue. However it could be green or even black.

Which is why I used that as an example. Not surprised it went right over the head of some people as they knee jerked a response.
Click to expand...

Just making about about stupid and irrational points of view, using your analogy. Nothing went over my head, I understand hyperbole quite well.
Click to expand...

I was making a point and you missed it. Twice now. I'm not shocked.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top