edit: I don't get it why Christians tend to accept not knowing the answers to quesitons about their god. How can you possibly say "I don't know" and not want to find out? (based on discussions with my religious friends)
edit2: and another thing... why don't christians understand that you don't need a god to be "moral"? Are all you christians bad people inside who are only "good" because you fear god is gonna send you to hell? Admittedly, I wouldn't consider myself "moral", since my actions are determined by what I expect will be best for me personally. It just happens that if you treat others well, you tend to be treated well, and if you abuse others, you won't be treated well either.
edit3: and before you start spouting stuff about how evolution is a load of bunk and creationism is such a perfect explanation, read this. EVERY creationist I've argued with has hit exactly the points listed in that article and no others. Can you really not come up with any more attacks which are not covered by that ONE article?
I think he is really that ignorant.
Originally posted by: petrek
3)I agree wholeheartedly with your last statement. God tells the Christian to be kind to those that hate you, because in so doing you will pour hot coals on their head. Also you could look up Job 4:8 and Galatians 6:7
In other words study what the various evolutionists have to say on the various subjects, look at how their views have changed over time, and pay close attention to the presumptions and assumptions they are concluding when they speak.
Which is the same reason you post here, right?
What is free will anyway? Why is an adult who was abused as a child so much more likely to abuse children themselves, as opposed to someone raised in a completely loving and supportive enviroment? Your Bible thump didn't seem to take into account all the elements that go into molding a person's self, that create the platform and resources of experience from which we make supposedly free decisions.
Haha. Ever heard of Charles Darwin?
do you know what evolution is?Originally posted by: petrek
Maybe then you can explain the step when one kind of animal changes into another kind of animal, seeing as there is no proof of such an event ever occuring.You might say I have "faith" in evolution, but I personally can see how evolution would occur. All the steps in evolution make sense.
2)A born again Christian can't be sent to Hell.
Originally posted by: JC
2)A born again Christian can't be sent to Hell.
A 'Get Out of Going to Hell' card?![]()
Charles Darwin did not prove that one kind of animal could create another kind of animal. Charles Darwin recognized the existence of micro evolution, which was admittedly, to anyone with eyes, fairly obvious.
First point - great rationale for loving those who hate you. Altruistism really pays out for a Christian, doesn't it?
Second point - I would ask you to say the same thing for Christians, for Jews, Muslims, etc. No religion is perfect. To say that Christianity has all the answers, is "the one true religion", is extraordinarily ignorant.
That can't be qualified solely as micro evolution.... if this process can change the anatomy of a creature, surely it can change bilogy, etc
It's not all that hard to live up to, if you take Jesus's approach "forgive them, for they know not what they do". It's far different than forgiving them in this life so they may face retribution in the next.Originally posted by: petrek
I just said it cause it's in the Bible and for that matter it's true, but also very hard to live up to. The initial desire is to respond in kind, but the reality is that you will do more good with kindness than with hate.
You've taken that statement out of context. I was suggesting to the poster to look at those rebuts in light of what other evolutionists have said and in light of the scientific facts and make conclusions based on that and not on the fact that the people he/she has previously debated with on the subject are greatly ignorant of the evidence that exists.
And now to respond to your statement, I would just like to say that if God does exist he either has or has not tried to make contact with man. If he has not made contact with man than all is lost and there really is no point in trying to understand him or how he thinks because it's obvious from his/her lack of contact that he/she does not want to be disturbed or understood.
If on the other hand God has made contact with man it greatly narrows the possibilities. And ultimately the most logical way for God to speak to man is through words being as that is how man communicates (although God as far as I believe already knew that because he created man). And the best way to ensure that those precious words are not lost is to write them down in a book. Again, the possibilities of which religious book could be from God narrow. A bit of sourcing and the logical answer is clear, either the Bible is the word of God, or God does not exist. I will state that the Word of God has all the answers, and to believe that a book written by an all knowing God to a creature created by Him for the purpose of developing a relationship with Him, and living a life pleasing to Him does not have all the answers necessary for its purpose is extraordinarily ignorant.
Originally posted by: fluxquantum
here we go again.![]()
Being mocked certainly fuels righteous pride. Believing yourself to have some conveniently godlike capacity to objectively discern what is or is not valid "evidence" doesn't strike me as being very humble either.
You tell me, they make the choice in a vaccum? One has only to know oneself to see that the absence of love and compassion in a person's upbringing will usually be reflected in their treatment of others.
Anyway, it doesn't work. Maybe there is no free will, or maybe some people just come into being inherently superior to others. Who knows....it's anything but clear cut what exactly makes up the self.
My logical response is to ask why such an all-knowing god would create such an esoteric, geographically and socially isolated theology
It's not all that hard to live up to, if you take Jesus's approach "forgive them, for they know not what they do". It's far different than forgiving them in this life so they may face retribution in the next.
Originally posted by: petrek
My logical response is to ask why such an all-knowing god would create such an esoteric, geographically and socially isolated theology
My logical response to you is, it is not so.
It's not all that hard to live up to, if you take Jesus's approach "forgive them, for they know not what they do". It's far different than forgiving them in this life so they may face retribution in the next.
I'm not sure I follow the second part of your statement, but as to your first let me just say that I think the last time that thought went through my head was a few months ago, which is why I said it's hard to live up to. In and of itself it's not hard, but when your busy working you get that one track mind thing going and you don't always think before you act, and thusly, unfortunately, you usually react in kind. And of course it's not only Christians that try to respond to anger with kindness, athiests do it to, the only difference is that the athiests aren't required of God to do it as disciples, being of course, that they are not disciples of Christ, nor for the most part are they trying to be.
Originally posted by: petrek
Ever hear of Chef Boy Ardee?
I thought Boy Ardee was one word.