Which is why you are here, and not the Defensive Coordinator for an NFL team.Well, I just don't see how you defend against their offense.
Which is why you are here, and not the Defensive Coordinator for an NFL team.Well, I just don't see how you defend against their offense.
Originally posted by: Carbo
Which is why you are here, and not the Defensive Coordinator for an NFL team.Well, I just don't see how you defend against their offense.
Wow, they should have hired you in Minnesota, that's all it takes to stop Philly! :roll:Originally posted by: Deeko
The key to stopping them is your front 7. Contain westbrook and the TE's. Don't give McNabb all day to throw. You don't have to sack him, just hurry him.
How is this effective? Well, double up on T.O. with your top CB and a safety. Pinkston is a small enough threat that he can be single covered. Use the other safety can be used to your defense's strengths, either back in zone, up in coverage, blitzing, whatever. You don't need an all-star secondary. Just a solid front seven....I think a defense like Carolina's, or hell even Dallas', will be capable of containing their offense.
Ah, Sea Isle, fond memories of Corona and sleeping bags on the beach at night... do they still let people on the beach at night? I know OC patrols for people which sucks.Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
We haven't heard from Deeko, he said only worry about Philly if they smash Minny... :crickets:
You haven't heard from Deeko because he's been in Sea Isle for the past few days, staying at a house with about 15 Eagles fans.
(I'd like to point out that these are intelligent Eagles fans for the most part, that I'm actually able to talk to about football, they aren't the type of brainless dolt that spouts nothing but TO IS MY GOD OMG EAGLES ARE #1 NO MATTER WHAT)
My thoughts on the game.
I didn't really see anything I didn't expect from the Eagles offense. The Vikings have an ok secondary, but the key to stopping the Eagles is the front 7, where the Vikings are horrible. No surprise to me that the Eagles scored as much as they did in this one.
However, I was impressed by Philly's red zone defense. For the most part they allowed Minnesota to march down the field, but then stopped them for 3 or less. The line put good pressure on Culpepper and the secondary locked down the receivers well.
Yes, this was a big win that certainly Eagles fans should be ecstatic about. However, I wouldn't be sizing up my fingers for rings just yet. This game was hardly a blowout...the last touchdown was clearly not even a reception, and the Vikings blew a lot of big chances with the offense sputtering in the red zone and stupid penalties. The game could have very easily gone the other way. Plus...as I've been saying, and will continue to say until I'm proved otherwise....the AFC is so dominant this year, it doesn't even matter who goes to the big game from the NFC, I can't see any of them beating the Colts or the Patriots.
Originally posted by: Deeko
Well, in case you didn't notice, the only thing decent on Minnesota's defense is their seconday. They don't have good linebackers or d-linemen. Think a little harder moron.
After 2 games he has 25% of his season high TD total of 16. That's not a decline if you ask me.TO is declining. He is not the player he was a few years ago
Did you see the game?However, [McNabb] is NOT the kind of guy that can run a pass only offense. That requires a QB with quicker thinking and the ability to throw accurate, short passes
Like Antoine Winfield?You don't even need a complete all-star secondary...a solid #1 CB and a competant safety to double T.O., and the other WR's can be held in single man-to-man.
I'd have to agree with you on this. Being a season ticket holder last year, a lot of us are admittedly out of our minds some of the time.(I'd like to point out that these are intelligent Eagles fans for the most part, that I'm actually able to talk to about football, they aren't the type of brainless dolt that spouts nothing but TO IS MY GOD OMG EAGLES ARE #1 NO MATTER WHAT)
The way Dallas "contained" the Vikings week 1? Carolina trashed us last year, and I would be very unhappy playing them this year, if not for the Steven Davis injury.I think a defense like Carolina's, or hell even Dallas', will be capable of containing their offense.
Originally posted by: Deeko
lordtyranus, I said they could contain the Eagles. Its a different kind of offense. Different defenses are good at stopping different offenses.
Kev,
that's a terrible picture, but fine, call it, its still not a touchdown by your loverboy. Did the Vikings win that fumble? Yep. Constant holding?? Yea, the ones that were called all the time. What's your point??
You aren't listening to me. The Eagles played well, but they did not convincingly dominate anyone. Like I said, don't start sizing up your fingers yet.
Originally posted by: Deeko
lordtyranus, I said they could contain the Eagles. Its a different kind of offense. Different defenses are good at stopping different offenses.
Kev,
that's a terrible picture, but fine, call it, its still not a touchdown by your loverboy. Did the Vikings win that fumble? Yep. Constant holding?? Yea, the ones that were called all the time. What's your point??
You aren't listening to me. The Eagles played well, but they did not convincingly dominate anyone. Like I said, don't start sizing up your fingers yet.
But they didn't.Daunte gets 3 more inches before that fumble. +7 vikings. Tice challenges the touchdown, it gets called back, and the Eagles have to punt. -7 Eagles. Vikings win.
Yeah, I meant the division 3 times, not NFC. I doubt Washington will do anything to Philly after the NYG beat them, and Philly stomped NY.Originally posted by: Deeko
None of us tried to sleep out there...but we were definitely out there(wasted) at like 3 or 4am. I'm sure it helps that being off-season, we were almost the only people on the island.
Well, I'm the exception then. How many of those Dallas fans have disappeared after the 3 5-11 seasons? I haven't. My brother was that kind of a fan...used to like Philly teams, but then also liked the Bulls and the 49ers. Nowadays....he's dropped the former-winners. Not me, regardless of where I'm from, I'm as loyal a fan as they come.
Moss didn't play that great a game, no. However, TO didn't really either, and he was playing against a worse secondary(its the strength of Minnesota's defense, which is sad, because its only mediocore). I still stand by my statement that Moss is a better receiver, and I won't waver from that. Yes, the Eagles secondary did play well, however, I wasn't a big fan of Minnesota's playcalling. The Eagles secondary was playing soft, giving them big cushions, and rather than exploit that with short passes(which was successful when they did it), they still kept trying to go deep.
Ummm....sounds like you're copping out on the TD reception arguement. Watch the replay. There is no way in hell that was a TD. The ref screwed up, Tice screwed up. End of story.
You can't in sound mind call that a dominant victory for the Eagles. You just can't. Change the outcome of maybe 3 plays, and you've got a victory for the Vikings. I'm not saying the Eagles don't deserve the win, they played well and they earned it. However, that game could have VERY easily gone the other way, and you can't deny it unless you are an absolute moron.
As for your little translation....no, you're wrong again. First off....Philly hasn't won the NFC in over 20 years, have you forgotten that? And you throw out "always"....umm....I'd like you to take a trip to Texas Stadium and take a look at the trophy case, see those 5 pretty things that are absent at the Linc? I still don't think the Eagles will win the conferance. Sure they have a chance, but in my mind the Vikings are still a better team, and the Seahawks are as well. Hell, the way Washington's D has been playing, if they don't turn the ball over 7 times, I could see them beating the Eagles, and if they stop with all the stupid errors, I could see Dallas doing it to. Week 10 my friend.
Originally posted by: Deeko
*sigh*
Daunte gets 3 more inches before that fumble. +7 vikings. Tice challenges the touchdown, it gets called back, and the Eagles have to punt. -7 Eagles. Vikings win.
I'm not saying the Eagles didn't deserve to win, they played a solid game and they won. However, you just can't call this a dominant victory. you can't. Be intelligent.....Dallas held Jeff Garcia to a 0.0 QB rating, and beat the team that scored 20 points against the vaunted Ravens defense, and I'm very unsatisfied with the game. Why? They could have very easily lost it. Is it THAT hard to admit that as an Eagles fan?
Originally posted by: Deeko
sp33demon, yea the eagles d-line played a great game, but you can't call a game a dominant victory if 2 plays resulting differently could have caused a different victor. You just can't.
TheVrolok....you aren't even worth my time. At least sp33demon and kev are intelligent, if (in my opinion) irrational. You are just ridiculous.