BoberFett
Lifer
Hey, if I insulted your boyfriend just bury your head deeper into the pillow next time so you won't be so butt hurt.
Nice veiled homosexual slur.
Hey, if I insulted your boyfriend just bury your head deeper into the pillow next time so you won't be so butt hurt.
296 posts...I guess they will let anybody join these forums......Hey, if I insulted your boyfriend just bury your head deeper into the pillow next time so you won't be so butt hurt.
After all that, you'd still have to look up to see me swim by you nutt hugging bristle worm.
Hey, if I insulted your boyfriend just bury your head deeper into the pillow next time so you won't be so butt hurt.
After all that, you'd still have to look up to see me swim by you nutt hugging bristle worm.
Listen to Nancy Grace. She knows what she is talking about.
http://www.eurweb.com/2014/11/nancy-grace-not-buying-darren-wilsons-story-it-doesnt-add-up-watch/
Listen to Nancy Grace. She knows what she is talking about.
Sometimes reality doesn't fit the narrative that you want to tell. So, you add an "embellishment" here, an "embellishment" there and the resulting fiction fits better into the narrative that you are trying to tell. You get a better story to tell when people ask you how you entered your line of work.
Nancy Grace has been telling a story for years about the murder of her fiancee, Keith Griffin, when she was 19 and how her outrage at the criminal justice system drove her to become a prosecutor and then a missing-white-woman reporter. Nancy Grace's fiancee, Keith Griffin, was murdered when she was 19. That part of the story is true, but that is just about the only part of the story that is true.
Propaganda
Most Americans don't get it either.I need someone to help me figure out how I feel about this situation.
1. I don't understand how a cop could think the best way to handle the situation was to shoot an unarmed person. He has a taser, baton, maybe less than lethal rounds for a shotgun, a radio to call for backup...all kinds of options besides firing multiple volleys at an unarmed person. Maybe the first shots when he was in his car and had no time to think but when he chased after Brown, knowing that Brown was dangerous, why not call for backup and follow him until he had help?
According to his testimony, Officer Wilson did call for back up. Brown turning around and charging back at him was not expected.
2. How can Brown's family and the media portray him as a "gentle giant"? I watched him not being so gentle right before he was shot. Exactly how can you be gentle but rob and bully people?
Easy, that's the narrative they want to put forward. There are many who still believe the "Hands up, don't shoot" narrative even though the evidence and other witness testimony disproves it.
3. How does rioting, stealing, arson, interrupting transit, shutting down malls do anything to even begin to fix anything? If the argument is a white cop shooting a black guy, why were so many snot nosed white kids out there causing mayhem?
It doesn't fix anything, this was an excuse for the anarchist crowd and thieves to loot and burn
4. Why is the federal government poking into this?
Al Sharpton and other activist leaders are demanding it
Why did Brown's parents go to the UN?
In hopes of gaining more support for their cause, even though it's based on lies
I just don't get it.
I need someone to help me figure out how I feel about this situation.
1. I don't understand how a cop could think the best way to handle the situation was to shoot an unarmed person. He has a taser, baton, maybe less than lethal rounds for a shotgun, a radio to call for backup...all kinds of options besides firing multiple volleys at an unarmed person. Maybe the first shots when he was in his car and had no time to think but when he chased after Brown, knowing that Brown was dangerous, why not call for backup and follow him until he had help?
Again, if Wilson's story is accurate, and Brown did indeed attempt to wrestle his weapon away from him (and no, I'm not saying it IS 100% accurate, no one knows that for absolute certain, but the weight of evidence is clearly in his favor), and then charge Wilson once out of the car, despite the weapon being raised, in Wilson's mind represented a clear and deadly immediate threat.
Hey, if I insulted your boyfriend just bury your head deeper into the pillow next time so you won't be so butt hurt.
After all that, you'd still have to look up to see me swim by you nutt hugging bristle worm.
I need someone to help me figure out how I feel about this situation.
1. I don't understand how a cop could think the best way to handle the situation was to shoot an unarmed person. He has a taser, baton, maybe less than lethal rounds for a shotgun, a radio to call for backup...all kinds of options besides firing multiple volleys at an unarmed person. Maybe the first shots when he was in his car and had no time to think but when he chased after Brown, knowing that Brown was dangerous, why not call for backup and follow him until he had help?
2. How can Brown's family and the media portray him as a "gentle giant"? I watched him not being so gentle right before he was shot. Exactly how can you be gentle but rob and bully people?
3. How does rioting, stealing, arson, interrupting transit, shutting down malls do anything to even begin to fix anything? If the argument is a white cop shooting a black guy, why were so many snot nosed white kids out there causing mayhem?
4. Why is the federal government poking into this? Why did Brown's parents go to the UN?
I just don't get it.
I've been stopped by the police as matching a robbery suspect.
I complied with their demands, and they let me go.
-John
First things first;
Backup was called for, but during the struggle inside the car and radio had been jostled onto the wrong channel. Other cars had been and were en route to the scene anyway, but the actual distress call and not been transmitted due to the scuffle at the car.
Secondly, and this is one that needs to be addressed, once you physically attack an officer (punching Wilson in the face, several other attempts at striking him), and grab for his weapon, you have escalated the situation to a lethal level.
Again, if Wilson's story is accurate, and Brown did indeed attempt to wrestle his weapon away from him (and no, I'm not saying it IS 100% accurate, no one knows that for absolute certain, but the weight of evidence is clearly in his favor), and then charge Wilson once out of the car, despite the weapon being raised, in Wilson's mind represented a clear and deadly immediate threat.
I need someone to help me figure out how I feel about this situation.
1. I don't understand how a cop could think the best way to handle the situation was to shoot an unarmed person. He has a taser, baton, maybe less than lethal rounds for a shotgun, a radio to call for backup...all kinds of options besides firing multiple volleys at an unarmed person. Maybe the first shots when he was in his car and had no time to think but when he chased after Brown, knowing that Brown was dangerous, why not call for backup and follow him until he had help?
2. How can Brown's family and the media portray him as a "gentle giant"? I watched him not being so gentle right before he was shot. Exactly how can you be gentle but rob and bully people?
3. How does rioting, stealing, arson, interrupting transit, shutting down malls do anything to even begin to fix anything? If the argument is a white cop shooting a black guy, why were so many snot nosed white kids out there causing mayhem?
4. Why is the federal government poking into this? Why did Brown's parents go to the UN?
I just don't get it.
I'm not saying Wilson should have been indicted. I'm asking why he would opt to shoot an unarmed person rather than follow him until backup arrived.
I carry a gun every day. I have a Glock 19 and 30 rounds of +P 9mm hollow points on me as I type this. If I survived an initial struggle over my gun, I would not chase the guy down and execute him. I totally understand the shots from the cruiser. I don't understand hunting someone down and executing them.
I'm not saying Wilson should have been indicted. I'm asking why he would opt to shoot an unarmed person rather than follow him until backup arrived.
I carry a gun every day. I have a Glock 19 and 30 rounds of +P 9mm hollow points on me as I type this. If I survived an initial struggle over my gun, I would not chase the guy down and execute him. I totally understand the shots from the cruiser. I don't understand hunting someone down and executing them.
I'm not saying Wilson should have been indicted. I'm asking why he would opt to shoot an unarmed person rather than follow him until backup arrived.
I carry a gun every day. I have a Glock 19 and 30 rounds of +P 9mm hollow points on me as I type this. If I survived an initial struggle over my gun, I would not chase the guy down and execute him. I totally understand the shots from the cruiser. I don't understand hunting someone down and executing them.
He didn't hunt him down and execute him. Wilson shot Brown from inside his cruiser and then exited it to likely render aid, as he was trained to do. It sounds silly to render aid to a person you just shot, but that is what they have to do. Brown then, upon Wilson exiting his cruiser, advanced towards Wilson causing more shots to be fired.
Sure, he could have just stayed in his cruiser and let Brown bleed to death on the street. But, apparently, Wilson isn't a bad person.