• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Missouri Police Officer guns down unarmed 18 year old

Page 175 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
So MOM was a talking head on CNN about 1/2 hour ago and said the reason for the delay was so that the defense team could be notified. If he was indicted, that would give him ample time to come in and be arraigned, and have a bond hearing before being wisked off to a safe place. So maybe there is an indictment given the time involved so far.

CNN also seemed to think it was relevant to point out that Darren Wilson got married a month ago to another Furguson police officer. So now the angry mob will be out to find out who she is in order to harass, threaten, etc or find him.
 
Are the names of the grand jury public? I hope they do the right thing, for their own sake.

FYI that isn't a threat. I am just wondering if names are public.
 
Last edited:
DCal430 said:
Are the names of the grand jury public? I hope they do the right thing, for their own sake.

FYI that isn't a threat. I am just wondering if names are public.
Click to expand...

You were active in the thread when it was mentioned several times that the members of a GJ are anonymous and legally have to remain that way. A member of a GJ can not out themselves as such without facing charges for doing so.

"I hope they do the right thing, for their own sake."

Sure... Not a threat but one that implies if they aren't protected by anonymity that they would be under threat of harm if they didn't indict Wilson.

Stay classy!
 
DCal430 said:
Are the names of the grand jury public? I hope they do the right thing, for their own sake.

FYI that isn't a threat. I am just wondering if names are public.
Click to expand...


No. The are kept private and by law they are supposed to not go public that they were on the grand jury.

- Merg
 
DCal430 said:
Are the names of the grand jury public? I hope they do the right thing, for their own sake.

FYI that isn't a threat. I am just wondering if names are public.
Click to expand...

You are such a piece of human filth.

The different side of the same scum coin that Spidey is on.

You're both cowards and losers of the lowest order.
 
DCal430 said:
Are the names of the grand jury public? I hope they do the right thing, for their own sake.

FYI that isn't a threat. I am just wondering if names are public.
Click to expand...
So they can be put down like rabid dogs if they don't indict?

I think probably they do indict.
 
This prosecutor has done so many things to doom this hearing to fail...

Leaks

Not turning the proceeding to a special prosecutor then not doing his job and prosecute it. He just does an evidence dump to a bunch of civilians who wind up trying the case, which is not supposed to happen.

Not waiting until morning to announce decision. Endangering protestors and police.


He didn't want to soil his hands with the case and then proceeded to not do his job.
 
HomerJS said:
This prosecutor has done so many things to doom this hearing to fail...

Leaks

Not turning the proceeding to a special prosecutor then not doing his job and prosecute it. He just does an evidence dump to a bunch of civilians who wind up trying the case, which is not supposed to happen.

Not waiting until morning to announce decision. Endangering protestors and police.


He didn't want to soil his hands with the case and then proceeded to not do his job.
Click to expand...

I agree, he needs to be disbarred. Can we write to the Missouri State Bar and demand he be investigated and disbarred.
 
HomerJS said:
This prosecutor has done so many things to doom this hearing to fail...

Leaks

Not turning the proceeding to a special prosecutor then not doing his job and prosecute it. He just does an evidence dump to a bunch of civilians who wind up trying the case, which is not supposed to happen.

Not waiting until morning to announce decision. Endangering protestors and police.


He didn't want to soil his hands with the case and then proceeded to not do his job.
Click to expand...

Wow... So much fail with you.

He did his job... to the letter. They didn't need a special prosecutor as even the DOJ didn't find civil rights violations.

"He just does an evidence dump to a bunch of civilians who wind up trying the case, which is not supposed to happen"

That is what a fucking Grand Jury is... civilians and you and everyone should be grateful that grand juries are. HE released all the evidence so there would be no question from anyone that the grand jury saw everything. He wasn't tried by the grand jury - that isn't their responsibility and you know it. Stop fucking trolling.
 
WackyDan said:
Wow... So much fail with you.

He did his job... to the letter. They didn't need a special prosecutor as even the DOJ didn't find civil rights violations.

"He just does an evidence dump to a bunch of civilians who wind up trying the case, which is not supposed to happen"

[That is what a fucking Grand Jury is... civilians and you and everyone should be grateful that grand juries are. HE released all the evidence so there would be no question from anyone that the grand jury saw everything. He wasn't tried by the grand jury - that isn't their responsibility and you know it. Stop fucking trolling.
Click to expand...

Hate to break it to you genius but GJs are probable cause hearings not the actual trial.

For example if the GJ goes into judging the credibility of one witness vs another that is what a trial is for.

Also prosecutors are supposed to prosecute the case. That is not what was done.
 
HomerJS said:
Hate to break it to you genius but GJs are probable cause hearings not the actual trial.

For example if the GJ goes into judging the credibility of one witness vs another that is what a trial is for.

Also prosecutors are supposed to prosecute the case. That is not what was done.
Click to expand...

This GJ did not try the case as I already said... Maybe you should go back and read your initial comment again and read where I quoted you... You are the one who insistes the GJ tried him. That simply is not possible and you know it.

Genius.
 
DCal430 said:
I am devastated, it has been leaked, no indictment. Corruption and evil won.
Click to expand...

That is the difference right there. While I have leaned towards the innocence of Officer Wilson, I would accept a GJ indictment of him as truth.

You and those that are hell bent on finding an innocent man guilty of anything will never accept the GJ decision if he isn't indicted.

Speaks volumes about you and yours.
 
liberal grievance mongering media ready to go into full mongering mode..they want lots of street combat with the cops and looting video.
 
I spoke to my wife about this. She said she would vote to indict NOT because of the officer's guilt or evidence but because she would fear retribution.
 
bshole said:
I spoke to my wife about this. She said she would vote to indict NOT because of the officer's guilt or evidence but because she would fear retribution.
Click to expand...

What? You have a wife? From your comments in this thread and this forum, anyone would think you are pre-teen. Remember how society must make Darren Wilson pay, regardless if he did anything wrong or not from your own words?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top