Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: Tommunist
would it not make more sense to base affirmative action on social status? it seems that affirmative action is working on the assumption that most minorities need help b/c they are at a disadvantage socially. it seems fair to say that some non-minorities have this same disadvantage (and that some minorities do not have the disadvantage) so why not actually target people that need help?
By social status you mean income?
That would be fine. Far better than whiners complaining about slavery in the 1800s.
Perhaps these people should stop speaking in ebonics, ala
?That niga' be a Mack Daddy,? Tyrome exclaimed. ?Yeah, but all the hood rats be sweatin' and playa' hatin' his abilities,? said Buck-wheat. ?Let's jump in the six fo,' mob back to tha' tilt, git mystical wit' some clova' sacs and holla at some chicken heads.?
Text
i wouldn't go as far as to call anyone a "whiner" about slavery but i think basing this sort of thing on economic background is more true to the goal of affirmative action. people should be viewed on a case by case basis on the traits that actually matter. just b/c someone is <insert minority here> does not automatically mean they are at a disadvantage.
