Cool comments about his book bruh.
Now on to what I actually said... he makes some great points in his debates I've watched, really hammers feminists and left of common sense liberals. The over reactive left doesn't know how to handle him, he doesn't fit into their compartmentalized partisan stereotypes. He's well spoken and a good debater. The fact that the left practically riots when he is going to visit their safe space campus is very telling. Anything that threatens their totalitarian bubble is attacked viciously.
This is a perfect example of being blinded by bluster, assholery and cults of personality over logic and reason.
The fact that he can and will provide no transcripts of these arguments that destroy his opposition is very telling indeed and indicative of people who are snowed by personality in the spoken word, yet realize an argument loses its luster when transcribed and devoid of the personality behind it.
Welcome to the YouTube generation who are snowed by logical fallacies, snake oil salesmen and flat earthers. People like Cernovich, Milo, Jones and Molineux are perfect examples of cults of personality whose arguments are utterly devoid of logic and filled with the most basic of logical fallacies. Yet their personality alone convinces people they are winning the argument. Molineux has even gone as far as to sue anyone who transcribes his arguments or even posts videos using his content to tear apart his logical fallacies. Yeah, a so called anti-government anarcho-capitalist uses big daddy government when it suits him.
This is why I never watch a YouTube video and always demand a transcript. If the argument loses in the written format it loses over all.