Microsoft Windows X I mean 10

Mar 11, 2004
23,444
5,852
146
So Microsoft is skipping 9 to go straight to 10 (not sure why they're not going to 11 though). Oh no! Rabble rabble version numbers rabble rabble!

They'll have to pull a Firefox and get aggressive in going up version numbers too if they want to catch Apple. Windows 10 Liger. Windows 10 LOLcat. Then they'd need to jump to geography. Windows 10 San Diego (codename Whale's Vagina). Windows 10 Seattle (Seahawks > 49ers). Or maybe Windows 10 SuperSonics (codename Fuck the Thunder).

Shame they're going with 10. Don't they realize X is far more extreme! Probably worried people will get confused. So is it the 10box One?
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
70,574
13,804
126
www.anyf.ca
Huh? Isin't the next one going to be called 9?

What I don't get is how they are so inconsistent in their naming schemes.

ex:
(not counting the server versions and may have skipped some near the start)
Windows 1.x: use version number
Windows Bob: use a name
Windows 3.x: back to using version number
Windows 95: Using year now
Windows 98: Gaining some consistency here, using the year again
Windows 2000/ME: Now we're talking (I'll consider "ME" as using the year, since it was the Millennium)
Windows XP: Huh? Going back to using a name I guess
Windows Vista: Ok guess they'll do way with years and version numbers
Windows 7: Huh? 7 what? What's this number for? Was there even a 6, a 5 ..a 1? Why 7?
Windows 8: Still kind of confused
Windows 9: Ok I guess this is simple enough, but why didn't you start at 1! I'm confused.
 

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,518
223
106
Huh? Isin't the next one going to be called 9?

What I don't get is how they are so inconsistent in their naming schemes.

ex:
(not counting the server versions and may have skipped some near the start)
Windows 1.x: use version number
Windows Bob: use a name
Windows 3.x: back to using version number
Windows 95: Using year now
Windows 98: Gaining some consistency here, using the year again
Windows 2000/ME: Now we're talking (I'll consider "ME" as using the year, since it was the Millennium)
Windows XP: Huh? Going back to using a name I guess
Windows Vista: Ok guess they'll do way with years and version numbers
Windows 7: Huh? 7 what? What's this number for? Was there even a 6, a 5 ..a 1? Why 7?
Windows 8: Still kind of confused
Windows 9: Ok I guess this is simple enough, but why didn't you start at 1! I'm confused.

Actually yes, but there hasn't been a 7 or 8 yet. :p
http://www.jrsoftware.org/ishelp/index.php?topic=winvernotes
[
5.0.2195 Windows 2000
5.1.2600 Windows XP
or Windows XP 64-Bit Edition Version 2002 (Itanium)
5.2.3790 Windows Server 2003
or Windows XP x64 Edition (AMD64/EM64T)
or Windows XP 64-Bit Edition Version 2003 (Itanium)
6.0.6000 Windows Vista
6.0.6001 Windows Vista with Service Pack 1
or Windows Server 2008
6.1.7600 Windows 7
or Windows Server 2008 R2
6.1.7601 Windows 7 with Service Pack 1
or Windows Server 2008 R2 with Service Pack 1
6.2.9200 Windows 8
or Windows Server 2012
6.3.9200 Windows 8.1
or Windows Server 2012 R2
6.3.9600 Windows 8.1 with Update 1
 

futurefields

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2012
6,470
32
91
gonna be twice the price as previous versions of windows watch

calling it now

what did windows 8 sell for? windows 10 gonna be atleast $50 more
 

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,518
223
106
gonna be twice the price as previous versions of windows watch

calling it now

what did windows 8 sell for? windows 10 gonna be atleast $50 more

I think I paid $15 for one of my licenses and $40 for the other.
 

momeNt

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2011
9,290
352
126
This looks awesome. Windows as usual, every other one is absolutely amazing.
 

futurefields

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2012
6,470
32
91
1zbea87.jpg


not sure i would trust this guy to make ANY decisions...
 

Imp

Lifer
Feb 8, 2000
18,828
184
106
My work just about finished rolling to Windows 7 from XP this past summer.

Now we're starting Windows 8 rollout -- why the eff didn't they just skip it?
 

Crono

Lifer
Aug 8, 2001
23,720
1,502
136
Looking forward to it.

I never had a big problem with 8, and 8.1 has been smooth sailing. It's only the settings being split between Modern and Desktop that has been a real nuisance, and a few compatibility issues very early on.

I think the biggest problem most people had with 8 is being unable to adjust to Metro/Modern, even though the way I think of it is as a full screen start menu. Keeping the background the same as your desktop helps with that, and all the tiles are adjustable. The massive tree of menus in older versions of Windows was worse, in my opinion, and you could always access the full list from the start screen, anyway.

Charms are easy access for things like search, too, but again not a lot of people seem to use them effectively - Microsoft was at fault there for not making them obvious or putting in the tutorial at launch. It helps that I've been using 8 since Developer Preview, though, and pretty much in every form factor (tablet, desktop, WP 8 phone).

Windows 10 is a step forward in "fixing" 8.1 because at least it gives options to the user. That's the one thing Microsoft really should have considered; no one likes to forced to use a new interface, not when upgrading to a new version. The classic desktop should have been there in Windows 8 with the old start menu, and Microsoft should have made the OS detect if you were on a desktop and ask if you wanted to use the old or new UI elements on first run. That would have been acceptable to most people.
 
Last edited:

HeXen

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2009
7,837
38
91
I just use windows to boot directly to Steam in big screen mode. OSX for everything else.

ain't nobody got time for that.

If you don't have time for any kind of hobby then you might want to consider using an eraser on your tight schedule once in a while. All work and no play is usually just wasting your life.