rh71
No Lifer
- Aug 28, 2001
- 52,844
- 1,049
- 126
True statement.Originally posted by: LuNoTiCK
I'm sure these pirates will be able to download versions with it slipstreamed. Microsoft can't stop them so easily.
True statement.Originally posted by: LuNoTiCK
I'm sure these pirates will be able to download versions with it slipstreamed. Microsoft can't stop them so easily.
Originally posted by: Modeps
Big deal, let them pirates suffer.
Originally posted by: NuclearFusi0n
Ah, I love when these threads come up and I don't have to give a damn. =)
www.gentoo.org
Originally posted by: Xiety
Originally posted by: oniq
Originally posted by: Xiety
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: Xiety
I :heart: Windows XP Pro ... most stable OS in my book. My desktop has been up for 25 days but my laptop is still going strong for more than 2 months![]()
heh, you'd love BSD or Linux then...
no thanks... I prefer an OS with user-friendly interface. Windows XP Pro > BSD or Linux. For me at least. And yes, I tried them both.
I guess.. if you like being baby-talked through life XP is the way to go. But once you are mature enough to figure out how to use a command line you may want to switch.
ROFL. You are dumb.
"Let's switch to Linux cause typing into the command line instead of a single click makes me mature and cool." :roll:
Originally posted by: dwell
Well, look at it this way. Someone who is pissed at MS for doing this creates a virus that targets a pre-SP2 exploit, rendering it un-patchable on these pirate systems. The virus does a massive DDOS attack on, say, microsoft.com. Suddenly you have hundreds of thousands of un-patchable computers banging the hell out of ms.com, or anyone and everyone the author wants to hose.Originally posted by: Klixxer
A keygen randomly creates numbers, it won't do anything except for those who have bought licenses for pirated versions with their computers, and those would be the targeted group.
And yes dwell, screw them, they do deserve it, if you want a free OS, do what i do, use a free OS.
Not patching the pirates makes sense from an ethical standpoint, but not from a practical one.
Originally posted by: Xiety
Originally posted by: oniq
Originally posted by: Xiety
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: Xiety
I :heart: Windows XP Pro ... most stable OS in my book. My desktop has been up for 25 days but my laptop is still going strong for more than 2 months![]()
heh, you'd love BSD or Linux then...
no thanks... I prefer an OS with user-friendly interface. Windows XP Pro > BSD or Linux. For me at least. And yes, I tried them both.
I guess.. if you like being baby-talked through life XP is the way to go. But once you are mature enough to figure out how to use a command line you may want to switch.
ROFL. You are dumb.
"Let's switch to Linux cause typing into the command line instead of a single click makes me mature and cool." :roll:
Originally posted by: Xiety
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: Xiety
I :heart: Windows XP Pro ... most stable OS in my book. My desktop has been up for 25 days but my laptop is still going strong for more than 2 months![]()
heh, you'd love BSD or Linux then...
no thanks... I prefer an OS with user-friendly interface. Windows XP Pro > BSD or Linux. For me at least. And yes, I tried them both.
Originally posted by: Klixxer
Originally posted by: Xiety
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: Xiety
I :heart: Windows XP Pro ... most stable OS in my book. My desktop has been up for 25 days but my laptop is still going strong for more than 2 months![]()
heh, you'd love BSD or Linux then...
no thanks... I prefer an OS with user-friendly interface. Windows XP Pro > BSD or Linux. For me at least. And yes, I tried them both.
You have? ok, now if you tried one of the distros that is marked "user friendly" you would have noticed that it is very user friendly.
Which distro did you try, which WM did it come with?
Well, it looks like those who used the XP CD key changer that supposedly generates random valid keys (no, I don't know this from personal experience) should be ok, unless MS changes things before the launch, or unless the keygen wasn't really a keygen and just recycled a list of keys (which I don't think so, given how long my friend said it took to find a key... unless it was a conspiracy, just spoofing with a delay loop or something).Microsoft has worked out the 20 most pirated product IDs and SP2 will not install and run on any copy of XP bearing one of those numbers.
"The situation at the moment is that we will block those," he said.
Originally posted by: Xiety
I :heart: Windows XP Pro ... most stable OS in my book. My desktop has been up for 25 days but my laptop is still going strong for more than 2 months![]()
Originally posted by: Modeps
Big deal, let them pirates suffer.
The article says right now that additional (20) keys are blacklisted, but that details may change before release.Originally posted by: Mik3y
well, how do they decide wut is pirated? the cd keys that are barred on the black list? or wut?
quote of the thread.heh, you'd love BSD or Linux then
Originally posted by: DaiShan
Originally posted by: TheToOTaLL
LOL!
Microsoft = teh funnay once again!
What do they consider a "pirated" version??? The media source that most "bootleggers" use is a Open/Select License copy, combined with a Volume License Key. Unless they are planning to cut out their biggest financial contributors - big businesses who only use the volume license copies - then there's not jack shyat they can do.
Eh you seem to be a little misinformed about how microsoft does their licensing. They do NOT have a single corporate license key. Each corporation gets its own key that they can use to install on all of the computers they have, microsoft makes them pay for a license for each computer in their organization CAPABLE of running windows xp. The bootleggers aren't generally using keys from legitimate corporations, its not like microsoft can't block their keys without reprocussion, its easy.
Originally posted by: dwell
Well, look at it this way. Someone who is pissed at MS for doing this creates a virus that targets a pre-SP2 exploit, rendering it un-patchable on these pirate systems. The virus does a massive DDOS attack on, say, microsoft.com. Suddenly you have hundreds of thousands of un-patchable computers banging the hell out of ms.com, or anyone and everyone the author wants to hose.Originally posted by: Klixxer
A keygen randomly creates numbers, it won't do anything except for those who have bought licenses for pirated versions with their computers, and those would be the targeted group.
And yes dwell, screw them, they do deserve it, if you want a free OS, do what i do, use a free OS.
Not patching the pirates makes sense from an ethical standpoint, but not from a practical one.
Originally posted by: NuclearFusi0n
Ah, I love when these threads come up and I don't have to give a damn. =)
www.gentoo.org
