irishScott
Lifer
sure why not allow unloaded derringers to be worn by students as well.
I once brought in a flint-lock musket replica for a 4th grade History project. *shrug*
sure why not allow unloaded derringers to be worn by students as well.
Nope, the kirpans you linked to would still be banned. You seem to have missed the part of having to meet certain criteria. If you had looked, the criteria are:
Starting Monday, January 31, 2011, baptized students of the Sikh faith will be allowed to wear the kirpan at school with the following conditions:
1. Any kirpan worn at school should be sewn inside a sheath in such a way that the blade cannot be removed from the sheath.
2. The blade of the kirpan is restricted in length to no more than two and one-fourth inches. This would take the object outside the scope of the Revised School Codes definition of a knife constituting a dangerous weapon.
3. The blade of the kirpan must be dull.
4. The kirpan should not be worn on the outside of the clothing and should not be visible in any way.
5. It will not be the practice of staff members to conduct random searches for the possession of kirpans. However, students who violate any of the above will be subject to discipline including a prohibition on wearing the kirpan to school in the future.
From: http://www.pccs.k12.mi.us/node/703
Andrew Mikel II admits it was a stupid thing to do. In December, bored and craving attention, the 14-year-old used a plastic tube to blow small plastic pellets at fellow students in Spotsylvania High School. In one lunch period, he scored three hits.
"What happened to Andrew Mikel is an example of how oppressive zero-tolerance policies have become," said John W. Whitehead, president of the institute. "School officials have developed a very dangerous mind-set that allows virtually no freedom for students, while at the same time criminalizing childish behavior."
What's with the trend of NOT READING that's running rampant in this thread?
Like the schools have tons of money to now check every kirpan that comes into the buildings every single day? How about kids go to fucking school to get an education and leave all the extra shit at home? And this is coming from a Hindu whose best friend is a sardar (who also says the same thing)
Like the schools have tons of money to now check every kirpan that comes into the buildings every single day? How about kids go to fucking school to get an education and leave all the extra shit at home? And this is coming from a Hindu whose best friend is a sardar (who also says the same thing)
😕
That's not what I'm talking about. If you can't address my point directly, don't bother.
Again, with regards to reading the thread... THERE WILL NOT BE SEARCHES.
And the school also doesn't have the money to search all the guns that are being concealed on students every day, what's your point?
Ahhh you quoted the other poster who had posted the rules so I was addressing the rules. Perhaps you explain your point concisely.
So why'd they waste so much money on committees and meetings to come up with rules that really can't be enforced? The existing rules say no weapons (and they define what a weapon is). Should have stuck with that and used the money wasted on new books instead.
Do the people who sit on school boards and work in the school admin get paid on a per issue basis? I'm gonna go out on a limb and say no, they are all salaried. No money was wasted clarifying the rules.So why'd they waste so much money on committees and meetings to come up with rules
They CAN be enforced. YOU WOULD KNOW THIS IF YOU READ THE THREAD!!!that really can't be enforced?
But back to the same point... they don't seach the kids for weapons as is... get it?The existing rules say no weapons (and they define what a weapon is). Should have stuck with that and used the money wasted on new books instead.
According to the rules, the "no weapons" rule still applies, a two and a half inch dull blade attatched permanently to it's sheath is not a weapon any more than a house key is a weapon.
But don't read, whatever you do, DO NOT READ! You'll lose all that outrage very quickly and then what would you do?
Now, the rules are being enforced as much as all other rules of "no weapons" are being enforced are they not?
You wouldn't happen to be of Pakistani heritage, would you?
Do the people who sit on school boards and work in the school admin get paid on a per issue basis? I'm gonna go out on a limb and say no, they are all salaried. No money was wasted clarifying the rules.
They CAN be enforced. YOU WOULD KNOW THIS IF YOU READ THE THREAD!!!
But back to the same point... they don't seach the kids for weapons as is... get it?
Holy shit dude
With respect to criteria #3 on the list, the blade made be dull, but it still has one hell of a pointy end.
They are salaried, that is correct. And for most of them, they work 40 hour weeks. It doesn't mean that it isn't a waste of money (You do realize that time == money, right?) . Let's say this "committee" spent 40 work hours total in coming up with this "resolution." And lets say that there are 10 members on this "committee." So now we're talking 400 hours of time that was spent on coming up with this. Time that could have been spent elsewhere.
Perhaps the folks misunderstood me, I don't give a shit about the new "policy" honestly, just about the time/money wasted on coming up with something that really has no business with the school system.
That's funny considering if you had read my posts, you woulda seen I said I was hindu. And, of course, you missed my point entirely. I'm outraged at the amount of money that was wasted (you know the "officials" that got together to come up with these rules didn't do so on their own time) on coming up with this completely useless rule. Why was it even considered. You go to school to get a fucking education, period. Guns, knives, bayonets, halberds, etc should have no place in a school period. I came up with that idea within 10 seconds.
![]()
I'm sure I could hurt someone with that.
They are salaried, that is correct. And for most of them, they work 40 hour weeks. It doesn't mean that it isn't a waste of money (You do realize that time == money, right?) . Let's say this "committee" spent 40 work hours total in coming up with this "resolution." And lets say that there are 10 members on this "committee." So now we're talking 400 hours of time that was spent on coming up with this. Time that could have been spent elsewhere.
Perhaps the folks misunderstood me, I don't give a shit about the new "policy" honestly, just about the time/money wasted on coming up with something that really has no business with the school system.