Michael Jackson is innocent

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Kev

Lifer
Dec 17, 2001
16,367
4
81
Originally posted by: gigapet
the whole premise of this case is absolutely silly. If michael wanted to touch little boys he could set up a giant boy touching facility in someplace like thailand and just boy touch all day long and not have to worry about any of this non sense.


edit:

think about it...he is very wealthy and very well traveled. He has been to almost every country in the world. He could easily get away with boy touching in developing countries. Why would he run the risk of boy touching in this country especially after the first accusation 10 years ago. He can just hop in a jet and visit a little boy brothel in some country in asia that makes my shoes when ever he had the urge. It just does not make sense for him to do this and although he is wierd looking i do not think he is mentally retarded. He could get away with kid touching if that was in fact his thing.

you've really thought this boy-touching thing through, haven't you? :shocked:
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: DrPizza
Another thing...

MJ had adult porn, not child porn.

I don't know. Do pedophiles who are interested in little boys get off by looking at porn of adult women? It doesn't make sense to me.

As I said above, child molesters very frequently use adult pornography to groom children for molestation.
 

OulOat

Diamond Member
Aug 8, 2002
5,769
0
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: DonVito
If you're curious, you can read about it in this thread.

So what were the full extent of his crimes?

Here's an excerpt from a document I wrote in connection with the case that lays it out. This stuff is all a matter of public record, since he was convicted, and it was all aired at trial. I have excised the names of the innocent:

a. The accused began a sexual relationship with his daughter, Briquel E, in approximately 1995, when she was 4 years old. Briquel recalls the accused vaginally penetrating her with his penis at that time, and remembers bleeding from the trauma of intercourse. She states that the accused had oral, anal, and vaginal sex with her several times per week between 1995 and the summer of 2001, during which time he was enlisted in the United States Army and stationed at Fort Riley, Kansas. Most of the sexual acts occurred in Kansas, but at least one rape of Briquel occurred in Utah. The accused also molested Briquel by fondling her breasts, legs, buttocks, and private parts with his hands, by placing his mouth on her breasts, and by taking showers and baths with her. In one instance, the accused also encouraged her to have sexual intercourse with her older brother, Jason, then return and tell the accused about the sexual act. The accused showed Briquel pornographic pictures and videos on numerous occasions.

b. During the summer of 1997, the accused picked up Ashley E, his daughter from a prior marriage, from her mother?s home in Utah. Ashley, then 9 years old, was to spend several weeks with the accused and his family in Kansas. During the cross-country drive back to Kansas, and after arriving there, the accused repeatedly molested Ashley, by removing her clothes while she was sleeping and placing his finger in her vagina while masturbating himself to ejaculation, by fondling her thigh and vagina with his hands, by forcing her to fondle his penis, and by rubbing his penis on her leg and buttocks. In approximately August 1997, the accused raped Ashley in Kansas.

c. In 1999, the accused played a ?strip blackjack? card game with his daughter Briquel and a neighbor girl, Brittany G. During the game, he placed Briquel and Brittany Gon his lap and put his hand down the underpants of Brittany Gand fondled her genitals. He was subsequently charged for this conduct and tried by court-martial. He encouraged his daughter Briquel to testify falsely on his behalf at the trial, and deny the molestation had taken place. She did so, and he was acquitted.

d. The accused left active duty with the Army in June 2001, and entered the Air Force on 29 August 2001. He was assigned to the 62d Transportation Squadron, McChord AFB. He moved to Washington in September 2001, but his family remained behind while the accused awaited placement in base housing. During the fall of 2001, the accused spoke to Briquel on the telephone, and asked her to masturbate while the two spoke. When he returned to Kansas for the Christmas holiday, he engaged in more sexual acts with Briquel, including inserting a dildo into her vagina, and taking nude Polaroid photographs of her. He subsequently burned the photographs in a barbeque grill.

e. On 4 Feb 02, the accused, after a proper rights advisement, confessed to his commander, Maj Arthur B, that he had molested his daughter, Briquel, but declined to provide any additional details. On 7 Feb 02, Maj B ordered the accused to refrain from contacting his wife, Angela, or any of their children. On 21 Feb 02, the accused violated this order by calling Angela E on the telephone.

f. In addition to the foregoing, charged offenses, the accused committed additional acts that may not be charged at trial, by operation of the applicable statutes of limitations, or because they occurred during his break in military service. We anticipate offering these for consideration by the finder of fact in reaching an appropriate sentence. Specifically, the accused digitally penetrated Briquel on a number of occasions at ages 2-7, and, when she was approximately 3, placed her nude atop her infant brother in an effort to initiate intercourse. Additionally, during his break in service, the accused showed the then 9-year-old Briquel bestiality pornography depicting sex between women and dogs, then attempted to mate her with a German shepard the family was dogsitting.

6 YEARS!!! :Q

How was he finally caught? I don't get why he finally confessed to his commander?
 

digitalsm

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2003
5,253
0
0
Originally posted by: gigapet
the whole premise of this case is absolutely silly. If michael wanted to touch little boys he could set up a giant boy touching facility in someplace like thailand and just boy touch all day long and not have to worry about any of this non sense.


edit:

think about it...he is very wealthy and very well traveled. He has been to almost every country in the world. He could easily get away with boy touching in developing countries. Why would he run the risk of boy touching in this country especially after the first accusation 10 years ago. He can just hop in a jet and visit a little boy brothel in some country in asia that makes my shoes when ever he had the urge. It just does not make sense for him to do this and although he is wierd looking i do not think he is mentally retarded. He could get away with kid touching if that was in fact his thing.

You do know there are international laws dealing with this under which he would be prosecuted by the US if caught doing that in another country.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: OulOat

6 YEARS!!! :Q

How was he finally caught? I don't get why he finally confessed to his commander?

He is a Mormon (in fact his parents were prominent members of the LDS Church in Utah - my understanding is that he was the President of the LDS Church of Utah), and he confessed to his LDS Bishop. To his credit, the Bishop apparently warned him that he might be obligated by state law to turn him in, and told him the only chance for his soul was to confess to someone in a position of authority. I believe he's since been excommunicated from the Mormon church.

He made only a very generic confession to his commander, but he told his daughter it would be OK to tell her mom the truth, and after that we got what felt like a neverending flow of ghastly information, bit by bit, as she offered up new tidbits. There are at least 100 facets of that case that make me want to cry, and made me want to kill him, and it was uncanny the way we'd hear about some dreadful new detail on Friday afternoons, week after week.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: digitalsm

You do know there are international laws dealing with this under which he would be prosecuted by the US if caught doing that in another country.

Actually, probably not. The US only has jurisdiction over offenses committed on US soil, so unless he happened to do this on an American military installation, the grounds of an embassy, or something similar, we'd be without jurisdiction. The only exception I can think of that's applicable to civilians is the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act of 2000 (actually I was involved in facilitating the first-ever case brought under this law), which wouldn't apply to Michael.
 

aidanjm

Lifer
Aug 9, 2004
12,411
2
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: DrPizza
Another thing...

MJ had adult porn, not child porn.

I don't know. Do pedophiles who are interested in little boys get off by looking at porn of adult women? It doesn't make sense to me.

As I said above, child molesters very frequently use adult pornography to groom children for molestation.

grooming would be a tactic used by hardcore, serial child molesters, I would have thought. Jackson certainly doesn't fit into that category. what is the likelihood that somone with no or minor experience in abusing children would engage in sophisticated grooming strategies?
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: aidanjm

grooming would be a tactic used by hardcore, serial child molesters, I would have thought. Jackson certainly doesn't fit into that category. what is the likelihood that somone with no or minor experience in abusing children would engage in sophisticated grooming strategies?

Not at all. It's not really a sophisticated tactic, if you think about it - it's just a way to introduce the topic of sex, and get the child sexually stimulated in a nonthreatening way.

I don't see MJ's actions as those of a garden-variety child molester, but more akin to the kinds of sexual activities children have with one another. If you haven't read it, I strongly recommend you look at the 1993 complaint against him for an illustration. As far as I can see, whether he's guilty or not, MJ is an emotionally stunted weirdo who doesn't appear to have matured past age 12 or so. In that context, I could see his use of pornography as something similar to what kids do prior to engaging in experimental sexual activity.

Again, I don't have a strong sense for whether he's guilty, but I lean toward believing he probably is.
 

aidanjm

Lifer
Aug 9, 2004
12,411
2
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: OulOat

6 YEARS!!! :Q

How was he finally caught? I don't get why he finally confessed to his commander?

He is a Mormon (in fact his parents were prominent members of the LDS Church in Utah - my understanding is that he was the President of the LDS Church of Utah), and he confessed to his LDS Bishop. To his credit, the Bishop apparently warned him that he might be obligated by state law to turn him in, and told him the only chance for his soul was to confess to someone in a position of authority. I believe he's since been excommunicated from the Mormon church.

He made only a very generic confession to his commander, but he told his daughter it would be OK to tell her mom the truth, and after that we got what felt like a neverending flow of ghastly information, bit by bit, as she offered up new tidbits. There are at least 100 facets of that case that make me want to cry, and made me want to kill him, and it was uncanny the way we'd hear about some dreadful new detail on Friday afternoons, week after week.

I suspect that for every case abuse that is prosecuted, there are 5 or 10 or more similar cases that go unreported. The details listed in the clipping you posted are very similar to the abuse experienced by an aquaintance of mine. She was raped by her father from around age 3 thru to age 16 (when she left home). Most of the abuse took place in the Philippines. The father was a school principle at a christian missionary school in that country. It appears that he was abusing numbers of children in the school, in addition to his daughter and possibly his son. Also, apparently, there were all sorts of depraved, sick abuse acts committed with animals and children. Stuff you wouldn't believe. This man returned to Australia, and is still in a position where he has some access to children on a daily basis. He has never been charged by the police. After his children left puberty, he separated from his wife, and re-marred to a lady with a couple of pre-pubesent kids. The behavior of these children supposedly underwent a dramatic change after the guy moved into the household. Supposedly community services has conducted an investigation re: these children, and concluded that no abuse is currently taking place. So who knows. Altho the guy has never been charged with molesting children, he has been arrested for some odd sexual crimes, for example he was apprehended by police masturbating on a busy highway (fixing the engine of his car while almost completely naked). The most sickening thing about this tale is the response of the mother when this girl (or young woman, now) began to speak about the abuse - the mother basically sided with the father, and it was the daughter essentially forced to leave home, not the father. The other sickening thing was the response of the christian community church (which the family was a part of), the members of the church basically rejected and excluded this young woman when she spoke about the abuse.


 

Doboji

Diamond Member
May 18, 2001
7,912
0
76
Originally posted by: DougK62
Originally posted by: Doboji
Remember in middle school when you were the little geek... different than everyone else. People picked on you non-stop, bullies beat up on you, you got picked last for sports teams. Yeah don't bs me... this is ATOT... 90% of you know exactly what I'm talking about.

LOL. This isn't the internet of 10, or even 5, years ago. Most people on ATOT were just your average kids growing up. The lame cliche that everyone on the internet must be a pasty geek is SOOOO tired and played out. It's a thinly veiled insult - and a poor one at that.

Maybe you weren't the pasty geek in middle school.... I WAS so if anyone was being insulted by my post it's me. The cruelty of children was astounding.... maybe you grew up somewhere pristine and clear of that cruelty.... I didnt. And the attitude towards MJ reeks of that same insidious joy at the weirdness of someone different that I experienced as a total geek in middle school.

-Max

 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: Doboji

Maybe you weren't the pasty geek in middle school.... I WAS so if anyone was being insulted by my post it's me. The cruelty of children was astounding.... maybe you grew up somewhere pristine and clear of that cruelty.... I didnt. And the attitude towards MJ reeks of that same insidious joy at the weirdness of someone different that I experienced as a total geek in middle school.

-Max

There is a MAJOR difference, however. Most of us, in junior high, are pretty clueless about who we are and how we define ourselves. We are bound by our genes and our hormones, and sometimes the outcome isn't pretty. Michael Jackson, however, is a man in his forties. He has (or at least has had) all the money on earth, boundless fame, and incredible talent. He's been one of the most famous people on the planet for 30 years.

In spite of the tremendous gifts he's been given, MJ has chosen to make himself a freak. He has, through dozens of plastic surgeries, morphed from a handsome young black man into a strange-looking white woman, then into an outright monster, without enough cartilage to support a proper nose (yet he lies and says he hasn't had these operations). He speaks publically in a weird, high-pitched voice (apparently his friends and family know his real voice is much deeper). He walks around in what can charitably be referred to as costumes, even when he's in court, faced with spending the rest of his life in prison.

He has three young children, who he's given bizarre names and who he forces to walk around veiled.

He has spent much of his adult life living in a Peter Pan-themed amusement park, surrouded by hundreds of other people's children. Well into middle age, he still shares his bed with young boys. Even after he's sued for molestation, and paid $15,000,000 to settle the suit, he continues to sleep with young boys.

In short, he is one strange ranger. He has elected to make himself a freak in the eyes of the public. None of this means he deserves to be presumed guilty, but he's earned the skepticism and the strange looks. To compare him to an awkward 13-year-old denies him the responsibility that comes with being an adult.
 

Tab

Lifer
Sep 15, 2002
12,145
0
76
1)People have always been curious about Micheal Jackson. True, just because you're very different than other people doesn't mean you're a child molester. The fact is you have to admit the guy is plain fvcking werid.

2) There is plenty of evidence to suggest Micheal was abused as a child. He was exposed to sex at a early age and was with his brothers when they brough there "groupies" over to the house.

3)His father was an extremely violent man and Micheal was afraid to death of him. Micheal hated the fact that his nose looked very simaler to his fathers and this is the reason he had facial surgery.

4)The previous 1993 case with the 15 Million Dollar settlement. I am no expert on lawyers, but wouldn't it be much cheaper than 15 for some laywers?

5)Micheal sleeps with the kids, not only that. The kids see him naked. The kids that stayed at the Ranch where able to idenifity him by his "BarberPole". Micheal Jackson for whatever ever reason, bleeches his own skin. This gives his penis a "BarberPole" look when it is erect. Jackson himself does a very poor job at defending his reasons when sleeping with boys. Why the hell do these kids know what Micheal Jackson's Johnson looks like?

6)The rumors of him giving alcholol to a underage child with medical problems and calling it "Jesus Juice". Micheal is NOT a doctor.

7)Some of the porn that was found was infact playboy and penthouse. Kids report having access to this. Why the hell do kids have access to this?

8)Hung on of his kids off a balcony in Germany. What the f*** is wrong with him?

In my personal opinion. Micheal may not have abused this particular kid, but it would not surprise me if he has abused someone else.
 

shilala

Lifer
Oct 5, 2004
11,437
1
76
I don't think Michael is the picture of the child molester we think of when we hear the term. I think he's flat out goofy. I get the sense that he thinks he's the same age as these kids and gets the same thrill of sexual exploration that kids get at a young age.
I don't think his aim was ever to have sex with these kids, and I think he truly thinks what he's done is okay because he thinks he's a little kid.
I absolutely believe he feels up little kids.
 

Linux23

Lifer
Apr 9, 2000
11,374
741
126
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: OulOat

6 YEARS!!! :Q

How was he finally caught? I don't get why he finally confessed to his commander?

He is a Mormon (in fact his parents were prominent members of the LDS Church in Utah - my understanding is that he was the President of the LDS Church of Utah), and he confessed to his LDS Bishop. To his credit, the Bishop apparently warned him that he might be obligated by state law to turn him in, and told him the only chance for his soul was to confess to someone in a position of authority. I believe he's since been excommunicated from the Mormon church.

He made only a very generic confession to his commander, but he told his daughter it would be OK to tell her mom the truth, and after that we got what felt like a neverending flow of ghastly information, bit by bit, as she offered up new tidbits. There are at least 100 facets of that case that make me want to cry, and made me want to kill him, and it was uncanny the way we'd hear about some dreadful new detail on Friday afternoons, week after week.

I suspect that for every case abuse that is prosecuted, there are 5 or 10 or more similar cases that go unreported. The details listed in the clipping you posted are very similar to the abuse experienced by an aquaintance of mine. She was raped by her father from around age 3 thru to age 16 (when she left home). Most of the abuse took place in the Philippines. The father was a school principle at a christian missionary school in that country. It appears that he was abusing numbers of children in the school, in addition to his daughter and possibly his son. Also, apparently, there were all sorts of depraved, sick abuse acts committed with animals and children. Stuff you wouldn't believe. This man returned to Australia, and is still in a position where he has some access to children on a daily basis. He has never been charged by the police. After his children left puberty, he separated from his wife, and re-marred to a lady with a couple of pre-pubesent kids. The behavior of these children supposedly underwent a dramatic change after the guy moved into the household. Supposedly community services has conducted an investigation re: these children, and concluded that no abuse is currently taking place. So who knows. Altho the guy has never been charged with molesting children, he has been arrested for some odd sexual crimes, for example he was apprehended by police masturbating on a busy highway (fixing the engine of his car while almost completely naked). The most sickening thing about this tale is the response of the mother when this girl (or young woman, now) began to speak about the abuse - the mother basically sided with the father, and it was the daughter essentially forced to leave home, not the father. The other sickening thing was the response of the christian community church (which the family was a part of), the members of the church basically rejected and excluded this young woman when she spoke about the abuse.

Wow. Just wow.
 

Tab

Lifer
Sep 15, 2002
12,145
0
76
Originally posted by: shilala
I don't think Michael is the picture of the child molester we think of when we hear the term. I think he's flat out goofy. I get the sense that he thinks he's the same age as these kids and gets the same thrill of sexual exploration that kids get at a young age.
I don't think his aim was ever to have sex with these kids, and I think he truly thinks what he's done is okay because he thinks he's a little kid.
I absolutely believe he feels up little kids.

Personally, I think he's a closet homosexsual.

He was abused as a child and there's evidence to suggest that it may have been sexsual.

He was thrown into a world of fame and admitting he was gay would have destroyed his career. Not to mention his father would have more than likely killed him.


Just my 2 Cents... Take it with a grain of salt...

 

Tsunami982

Senior member
Apr 22, 2003
936
0
0
i suspect he is guilty.... was too many people saying that he molested him. and what the hell was jackson thinking when he went on tv and said it was ok for grown men to sleep with little boys in the same bed (men not being their father)?
 

ribbon13

Diamond Member
Feb 1, 2005
9,343
0
0
Wasn't the Jackson family Jehovah's Witness when they were kids? I could of swore I heard that before.
 

hemiram

Senior member
Mar 16, 2005
629
0
0
The whole family are still JW's, as far as I know.

As far as thinking he's guilty or not, this case sounds a lot like what happened to a friend of mine who was molested by his cousin, an Orthodox, not Catholic, priest about 30 years ago.

This was a second cousin, who had only met my friend's parents when they were in the 20's and before my friend was born. Well, he gets transferred to the local area, and starts coming over, more and more often. My friend was about 12 at this time, and was kind of miserable, to be honest. There were 4 older kids, and he got picked on by them, along with a younger sister who tormented him too. There was a last, seventh kid, a boy who was about 3, too young to be of interest.

At first, he took all the younger kids out, including the girl, but he soon zeroed in on, let's call him "George", and started taking him to dinner, movies, etc. This was around 1970 and the molesting thing was off the charts, it just was unthinkable. One day, he asked if he could take George with him to New York, to visit relatives and "let him have some fun". His parents agreed, and off they went. Later on, George would tell that that was the first time "Things got weird". The first night, the cousin bought some porn, and they looked at it together. Nothing happened other than that, but apparently it felt odd to my friend. The next night, he bought a bottle of vodka, and a bottle of scotch, and some 7UP and Coke too. He gave my friend enough to get him drunk, and still, nothing really happened, except the cousin told him several times "what a great looking kid he was", and that he wished he looked like him. Just kind of odd, but my friend was drunk for the first time, and was too loaded to really care. The next night, they stayed for dinner at a relative's house and got back so late they both just plopped into bed and fell asleep.

Then the last night they were there, it finally happend. They had gone out to dinner with another relative and his wife, and got back to the hotel early. They both drank and my friend passed out and when he woke up, he was getting "a hand job". He jumped up and yelled at him, and the cousin cried and said he was sorry, etc, but he was lonely...

After they came home, he didn't want to do anything with the cousin, but was almost forced to by his parents, as they thought the cousin was a "good person to have him hang around with". His father had given the cousin a SOLID GOLD cross that his father, a priest had received 30 years earlier just before the trip to NY. That thing had to weigh 3 or 4 pounds, easy. So he kept quiet, and went with him to dinner again, etc. He never made any kind of move, and neither one mentioned what happened at all.

A few months later, the cousin wanted to take him to Fla, for some sort of "youth conference" and he didn't want to go. He somehow convinced his older brother, who would have probably kicked the crap out of the cousin if he tried to pull anything like he did in NY to go instead. The cousin wasn't happy about it, but what could he say? It went ok, and the brother "Gary" just said the cousin was "boring", and that was about it.

My friend got his driver's liscense at 16, and his parents bought the cousin's car for him, and instnstly, the cousin wants to go to Chicago to get his new car from another relative who was a dealer. My friend was kind of forced to go, and that night, the cousin finally made his move, after convincing George to try a Quallude (a kind of sleeping pill) after having a couple of shots of booze before that. He fell asleep, and when he work up, the cousin was doing him orally. He slugged him in the face, and got into his car and drove back home, never saying a thing about it.

After that night. He refused to go anywhere with him, but still said nothing, and really became miserable until he joined the Air Force at 18 and went to Korea. We all wondered what he was so miserable about, and why he started drinking a lot.

Nobody knew what happened, and he told no one. A few years ago, the cousin was arrested for doing pretty much the same thing with a 14 year old kid, also a relative. When he was on trial, the victims showed up, one after another. My friend still said nothing to anyone here. His mother thought the charges were bogus, and after the cousin was found guilty, she was having dinner with George and his wife and baby, and he finally blurts out, "He did it to me too, I went up there and testified against him!" All hell broke loose soon after, someone, another relative, saw George testifying, and the word spread to all the family members that he had testifed and half thought it was a good thing, and half said, some of them to his face, that he was a liar.

The cousin is in jail now, he's got a 15-30 year sentence for the last kid, and they are putting him on trial for another molestation, this one of a kid that attended his church.
The kid tried to kill himself when word got out, and it's going to be ugly at this trial.

So I still don't know if MJ is guilty, but it (the story) sounds right, and wouldn't shock me if he goes away...for a long time. I don't think he will be able to take prison, even if in isolation. We should know fairly soon....
 

aidanjm

Lifer
Aug 9, 2004
12,411
2
0
Originally posted by: Tabb
Originally posted by: shilala
I don't think Michael is the picture of the child molester we think of when we hear the term. I think he's flat out goofy. I get the sense that he thinks he's the same age as these kids and gets the same thrill of sexual exploration that kids get at a young age.
I don't think his aim was ever to have sex with these kids, and I think he truly thinks what he's done is okay because he thinks he's a little kid.
I absolutely believe he feels up little kids.

Personally, I think he's a closet homosexsual.

He was abused as a child and there's evidence to suggest that it may have been sexsual.

He was thrown into a world of fame and admitting he was gay would have destroyed his career. Not to mention his father would have more than likely killed him.


Just my 2 Cents... Take it with a grain of salt...

If he was "gay" he would be having sex with men, not boys. It's hardly unusual for a celebrity to be secretly gay. See George Michael, Elton John, Boy George, Liberace, Freddie Mercury, blah blah. All of these gay men were fvcking other men before they came out of the closet, they weren't feeling up teen boys.
 

aidanjm

Lifer
Aug 9, 2004
12,411
2
0
Originally posted by: hemiram
When he was on trial, the victims showed up, one after another.

yeah, but where are all the previous victims of MJ? There are only 2 cases.