• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Miami police shoot unarmed man

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Whelp, I've got some good news and some bad news.
Good news: the cop was convicted! Yay!
Bad news: of a misdemeanor.

But wait there's more good news/bad news.
Good news: some good cops criticized the way the department was handling the investigation! Yay they exist!
Bad news: not anymore. They don't exist anymore. The good cops were fired and demoted.

But wait. God damn it there's more.
Good news: the jury foreman apologized!
Bad news: to the cop for not being able to get him off while he shook the cop's hand.

FUCK
 
Whelp, I've got some good news and some bad news.
Good news: the cop was convicted! Yay!
Bad news: of a misdemeanor.

But wait there's more good news/bad news.
Good news: some good cops criticized the way the department was handling the investigation! Yay they exist!
Bad news: not anymore. They don't exist anymore. The good cops were fired and demoted.

But wait. God damn it there's more.
Good news: the jury foreman apologized!
Bad news: to the cop for not being able to get him off while he shook the cop's hand.

FUCK

Pretty much what is expected. The main problem we have with the police is that they are not held accountable for their actions, so they don't act like they are accountable for their actions.
"To Protect and Serve" has become "To Enforce and Control".
 
Pretty much what is expected. The main problem we have with the police is that they are not held accountable for their actions, so they don't act like they are accountable for their actions.
"To Protect and Serve" has become "To Enforce and Control".
Should be "I think everybodies out there to kill me, so I escalate first"
 
Pretty much what is expected. The main problem we have with the police is that they are not held accountable for their actions, so they don't act like they are accountable for their actions.
"To Protect and Serve" has become "To Enforce and Control".


quit resisting! (as you are face down with a knee in the back of your neck)

so sad but true
 
Whelp, I've got some good news and some bad news.
Good news: the cop was convicted! Yay!
Bad news: of a misdemeanor.

But wait there's more good news/bad news.
Good news: some good cops criticized the way the department was handling the investigation! Yay they exist!
Bad news: not anymore. They don't exist anymore. The good cops were fired and demoted.

But wait. God damn it there's more.
Good news: the jury foreman apologized!
Bad news: to the cop for not being able to get him off while he shook the cop's hand.

FUCK
Wtf... incredible. Who are these people who basically give cops a free pass on attempted murder?
 
Wtf... incredible. Who are these people who basically give cops a free pass on attempted murder?

I think the average American can't bring themselves to think a cop might do something evil.

I remember reading something about a theory that people need to view their cops as good or else they can't view their society (and therefore themselves) as good.
 
I think the average American can't bring themselves to think a cop might do something evil.

I remember reading something about a theory that people need to view their cops as good or else they can't view their society (and therefore themselves) as good.

I think that is changing. Even most of the staunchest 'blue lives matter' people from two years ago are changing their minds. Almost every one of them have now decided that these sort of things are happening way too often and we might need to do something about it.

I still hear the 'few bad apples' argument, but it is easy enough to remind them that the saying actually goes 'a few bad apples spoil the bunch.' That sure most officers are not going around shooting innocent people, but the few that do give them all a black eye, and that it would not hurt the majority of the good ones to hold the bad ones responsible. They tend to agree with me after that.
 
I think that is changing. Even most of the staunchest 'blue lives matter' people from two years ago are changing their minds. Almost every one of them have now decided that these sort of things are happening way too often and we might need to do something about it.

I still hear the 'few bad apples' argument, but it is easy enough to remind them that the saying actually goes 'a few bad apples spoil the bunch.' That sure most officers are not going around shooting innocent people, but the few that do give them all a black eye, and that it would not hurt the majority of the good ones to hold the bad ones responsible. They tend to agree with me after that.
Someone needs to run TV PSAs that says hey cops screw up too and need to go to jail. There was a study by some UofC economists who found that 10-15% of all tricks prostitutes were turning were for cops who were more or less extorting them. It's not in anyway a noble profession. I liken them more to roadkill removal or orderlies at mental institutions: a necessary and unpleasant service that most be provided rather than a position to be exalted in society.
 
I think that is changing. Even most of the staunchest 'blue lives matter' people from two years ago are changing their minds. Almost every one of them have now decided that these sort of things are happening way too often and we might need to do something about it.

I still hear the 'few bad apples' argument, but it is easy enough to remind them that the saying actually goes 'a few bad apples spoil the bunch.' That sure most officers are not going around shooting innocent people, but the few that do give them all a black eye, and that it would not hurt the majority of the good ones to hold the bad ones responsible. They tend to agree with me after that.

I disagree because every single time every juror agrees that the cop should walk. THEY are the ones who can "do something about it." They refuse.
 
I disagree because every single time every juror agrees that the cop should walk. THEY are the ones who can "do something about it." They refuse.

I think that has more to do with the problems with Voir Dire than the general population. Our jury system is currently broken and needs to be fixed. I think a fix to that is something that could come from all this as well.
 
I think that has more to do with the problems with Voir Dire than the general population. Our jury system is currently broken and needs to be fixed. I think a fix to that is something that could come from all this as well.

At this point I'm starting to give up on ever actually prosecuting these guys, but I'd be OK with getting them permanently out of law enforcement. I like the idea of requiring personal, individual insurance. If they become uninsurable due to bad behavior/lawsuits, then they can't be LEO. If enough guys lose their careers, there could be a change in mentality due to the fact that there are now consequences for actions.
 
Whelp, I've got some good news and some bad news.
Good news: the cop was convicted! Yay!
Bad news: of a misdemeanor.

But wait there's more good news/bad news.
Good news: some good cops criticized the way the department was handling the investigation! Yay they exist!
Bad news: not anymore. They don't exist anymore. The good cops were fired and demoted.

But wait. God damn it there's more.
Good news: the jury foreman apologized!
Bad news: to the cop for not being able to get him off while he shook the cop's hand.

FUCK
Absolutely FUCKING nauseating. 😡😡😡
 
Back
Top