- Dec 7, 2006
- 50
- 0
- 0
I need some clarification on DDR2 desktop memory that I'm having trouble selecting for use on a 965 motherboard. I may or may not overclock, but it won't be too aggressive.
1) SS / DS: I believe refers to single sided / dual sided memory. This has nothing to do with dual channel. It only has to do with if individual ram chips are on one or both sides of a ram board/stick. Does this matter to the average end consumer? There's no physical problem with mounting two DS chips next to each other, is there?
2a) Running Dual Channel: To run in dual channel mode you need two ram sticks, preferably identical, and a motherboard that is dual channel supported. Anything else? Does SS / DS play a factor? Will any identical DDR2 work (baring specific motherboard issues with specific ram)?
2b) Dual Channel Operation: Is dual channel a clear improvement over single? I know the basic theory that it reduces the bottle neck of data going from the ram to the cpu. You basically have the ram of each chip, moving faster because of the other, right? In other words, 2 x 1GB single channel chips = 2GB of ram, but would 2 x 1GB dual channel = 2GB of faster ram, or just 1GB of faster ram (in principle like RAID 0)? Basically, I'm wondering if there are any trade offs to why you wouldn't use dual channel, but answering that last question would help me determine for myself the amount of ram to get.
1) SS / DS: I believe refers to single sided / dual sided memory. This has nothing to do with dual channel. It only has to do with if individual ram chips are on one or both sides of a ram board/stick. Does this matter to the average end consumer? There's no physical problem with mounting two DS chips next to each other, is there?
2a) Running Dual Channel: To run in dual channel mode you need two ram sticks, preferably identical, and a motherboard that is dual channel supported. Anything else? Does SS / DS play a factor? Will any identical DDR2 work (baring specific motherboard issues with specific ram)?
2b) Dual Channel Operation: Is dual channel a clear improvement over single? I know the basic theory that it reduces the bottle neck of data going from the ram to the cpu. You basically have the ram of each chip, moving faster because of the other, right? In other words, 2 x 1GB single channel chips = 2GB of ram, but would 2 x 1GB dual channel = 2GB of faster ram, or just 1GB of faster ram (in principle like RAID 0)? Basically, I'm wondering if there are any trade offs to why you wouldn't use dual channel, but answering that last question would help me determine for myself the amount of ram to get.